Sjarlez

Sjarlez — CS2 Stats

76561197985564826[U:1:25299098]Steam profile ↗

2,124Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,425Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17358 of 48069 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,793 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,425Peak Premier on CSDB
1,793Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,793
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 208 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,425
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,575 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSjarlezFACEITLevel 9 · 1,793 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,425 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,793csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning54
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45505Last 10045%Win rateLLWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression6.7
Utility6.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time527ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–11
132Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7cacheWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB26131350%0.02
nukeB26121446%0.03
infernoB22101245%-0.00
dust2C73443%-0.00
cacheD71614%-0.00
anubisA74357%-0.01
mirage31233%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.01
overpass1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,298Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
78.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno20847%1.1115.3
Nuke17858%1.2916.7
Ancient14041%1.0814.7
Overpass8457%1.2015.7
Anubis5238%1.1215.9
Vertigo3749%0.9213.8
Dust23639%0.8112.3
Train2556%1.5215.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
526msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.48HE damage / grenade
15.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6508% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0428%28 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0019%23 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0218%23 Aug
cache10–13-0.0331%23 Aug
ancient13–70.1019%23 Aug
ancient13–20.0924%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0122%18 Aug
anubis13–90.0616%18 Aug
nuke13–80.0523%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.058%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0121%17 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0413%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.0119%17 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0417%17 Aug
ancient15–150.0517%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0611%12 Aug
ancient8–130.0716%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0212%6 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0519%6 Aug
vertigo13–80.0121%6 Aug
ancient4–13-0.028%5 Aug
nuke7–130.0110%5 Aug
ancient13–110.1418%5 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0111%5 Aug
inferno9–60.1219%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.029%4 Aug
cache11–130.0313%4 Aug
ancient7–130.0720%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0317%3 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0222%2 Aug
dust213–5-0.0515%2 Aug
nuke9–130.0720%29 Jul
inferno15–150.0419%28 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0320%28 Jul
nuke16–140.0216%28 Jul
nuke13–70.059%28 Jul
inferno10–130.027%28 Jul
inferno13–70.0325%27 Jul
nuke10–130.0412%27 Jul
anubis13–30.0712%27 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0112%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0135%22 Jul
nuke6–130.0118%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0922%22 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%22 Jul
cache5–13-0.0210%22 Jul
nuke13–60.0123%21 Jul
dust213–30.0820%21 Jul
inferno9–130.0112%21 Jul
cache1–13-0.0227%21 Jul
cache13–60.0323%21 Jul
nuke13–100.0441%21 Jul
inferno13–90.0121%21 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0319%21 Jul
ancient10–13-0.136%19 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0120%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0411%19 Jul
ancient13–90.0517%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0814%18 Jul
nuke13–110.0116%16 Jul
nuke13–90.0933%16 Jul
ancient3–13-0.003%16 Jul
ancient10–130.0014%16 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0317%16 Jul
inferno13–60.0830%16 Jul
nuke7–130.0511%15 Jul
cache5–130.0214%15 Jul
dust28–130.0013%15 Jul
inferno13–70.0323%15 Jul
inferno10–130.0711%15 Jul
nuke13–20.0216%15 Jul
ancient13–100.0716%15 Jul
nuke6–130.0328%12 Jul
ancient7–130.0115%12 Jul
ancient13–110.0614%12 Jul
nuke13–90.0022%12 Jul
dust213–30.0124%12 Jul
nuke15–150.0627%12 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0112%11 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0518%10 Jul
nuke9–130.0124%10 Jul
nuke10–130.0225%5 Jul
overpass7–130.0319%5 Jul
ancient13–50.0318%5 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0714%5 Jul
nuke13–20.0619%5 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0219%5 Jul
nuke13–110.0131%2 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0016%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0119%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0312%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0424%2 Jul
inferno13–80.0615%2 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0335%1 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1217%1 Jul
ancient11–130.0716%30 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0726%30 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0016%26 Jun
nuke5–130.0718%26 Jun
nuke13–80.1118%26 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →