mOmO

mOmO — CS2 Stats

HU76561199042051418[U:1:1081785690]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

960Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,527Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,699Top 5% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3871 of 261666 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,699 +5,014 1 Sept – 13 Nov · 20 days played
22,68528,056peak 28,0561 Sept13 Nov
28,056Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 357 below peak (28,056)
  • +1,391 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,301 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,948), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate55.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy6.2%12.7%13.0%6.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.051.060.18 short
Match win rate45.5%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmOmOFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER27,699 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning56
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +9.5pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 13 Nov →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 13 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · anubis, 30 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 3 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 77% over 13nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1810–856%0.00
mirageC188–1044%-0.01
dust2B168–850%-0.00
ancientB158–753%-0.01
anubisC135–838%-0.01
cacheS1310–377%-0.02
nukeD62–433%-0.02
office—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,727Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,123Matches
45.5%Match win rate
55.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
6.2%Shot accuracy
5,275MVPs
1,026Hours (in match)
2,177Bombs planted
993Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,898inferno
4,166dust2
996nuke
471vertigo
336office
248train
26cbble
18italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
57%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
—ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1471%1.1016.7
Ancient1392%1.3017.1
Anubis956%0.9314.8
Mirage560%0.8713.6
Overpass540%0.7712.2
Nuke10%0.417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
546msReaction time
57.7%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.38HE damage / grenade
9.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.1230%13 Nov →
ancient13–4-0.0120%13 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0520%13 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0529%13 Nov →
inferno13–40.0141%13 Nov →
dust213–30.0333%13 Nov →
nuke2–130.0328%13 Nov →
nuke13–80.0024%11 Nov →
anubis13–20.1230%11 Nov →
ancient13–40.0231%11 Nov →
inferno16–12-0.0119%11 Nov →
dust213–110.0016%11 Nov →
mirage13–100.0219%11 Nov →
anubis2–130.0129%11 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0315%10 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.0812%10 Nov →
cache5–13-0.059%10 Nov →
anubis8–1-0.0527%10 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0719%10 Nov →
dust213–60.0627%10 Nov →
dust26–13-0.085%10 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0323%9 Nov →
mirage13–80.0819%7 Nov →
cache13–100.0316%7 Nov →
ancient13–40.1019%6 Nov →
dust213–110.0117%6 Nov →
dust24–130.0736%6 Nov →
cache11–130.0024%6 Nov →
ancient8–130.0121%6 Nov →
ancient13–80.0212%5 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0614%5 Nov →
inferno15–150.0217%5 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0736%5 Nov →
mirage13–110.0627%3 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0124%3 Nov →
inferno13–1-0.0025%3 Nov →
office10–130.0521%3 Nov →
ancient11–130.0013%2 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0519%2 Nov →
dust213–160.0231%2 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0622%2 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0416%2 Nov →
nuke9–130.0127%2 Nov →
anubis2–130.0732%30 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0326%30 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0319%30 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0232%30 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0513%30 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0521%30 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0312%30 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0711%30 Oct →
mirage6–130.0025%30 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0632%30 Oct →
anubis13–40.049%30 Oct →
inferno9–130.0019%30 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0214%30 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.066%30 Oct →
mirage4–1-0.035%30 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0116%30 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0322%30 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0313%29 Oct →
mirage0–130.000%29 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0140%29 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0031%29 Oct →
anubis10–130.0315%29 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0223%29 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0229%28 Oct →
inferno13–80.0629%28 Oct →
dust213–110.0020%28 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0126%26 Oct →
anubis15–150.0120%26 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0415%26 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0322%26 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0419%26 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0321%26 Oct →
inferno7–130.0027%26 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0217%25 Oct →
inferno13–90.0725%25 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0117%25 Oct →
inferno13–100.0217%25 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0313%25 Oct →
cache13–80.0217%25 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0314%25 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0419%25 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0116%25 Oct →
inferno5–11-0.0811%25 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0718%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0117%21 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.094%21 Oct →
ancient13–40.0020%21 Oct →
cache13–90.0015%21 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0311%21 Oct →
cache13–30.0320%21 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0111%20 Oct →
mirage4–130.0314%20 Oct →
dust215–150.0218%19 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0020%19 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0217%19 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0421%19 Oct →
mirage5–130.0215%19 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.