RabaukenBobby

RabaukenBobby — CS2 Stats

AM76561199035731827[U:1:1075466099]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,576Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,538Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,279Top 50% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75407 of 247965 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,571 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,279 -1,021 21 Jul – 30 Sept · 20 days played
20,00021,642peak 21,64221 Jul30 Sept
21,987Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,571Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,571
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,363 below peak (21,642)
  • +169 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,721 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches42——
Win rate45%——
K/D0.94——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate53.2%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy7.3%12.7%13.0%5.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.051.06meets
Match win rate49.6%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRabaukenBobbyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,571 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,279 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,571csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −9.8pp headshot accuracy · −130ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time597ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 19 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · mirage, 1 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 40% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3012–1840%-0.01
anubisC198–1142%0.03
cacheC146–843%0.01
nukeC104–640%-0.01
ancientA106–460%0.04
dust2S76–186%0.00
debris—42–250%0.10
mirage—32–167%0.02
office—10–10%0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
eldorado—11–0100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,523Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,786Matches
49.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
53.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
7.3%Shot accuracy
15,736MVPs
5,292Hours (in match)
4,927Bombs planted
983Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,360
AWP10,151
SSG 081,879
FAMAS1,845
MAC-101,673
MP91,532

Lifetime map wins

14,260inferno
4,475dust2
2,999nuke
1,338train
1,047cbble
1,036vertigo
317office
279lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

220Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4250%0.9915.1
Anubis2854%1.4320.0
Ancient2245%1.1918.7
Inferno2255%1.0416.9
Dust22055%1.0215.4
Nuke1464%1.2320.8
Cache450%0.9114.5
Overpass250%1.0414.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
592msReaction time
62.3%T opening success
39.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
17.9%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
3.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9264 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.0477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–130.0515%30 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0630%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0113%30 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0114%30 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0421%29 Sept →
anubis13–90.0221%29 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.049%29 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0313%29 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0612%29 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0423%29 Sept →
cache13–40.0230%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0126%29 Sept →
inferno8–130.0829%29 Sept →
anubis13–80.0114%28 Sept →
debris2–9-0.1524%28 Sept →
inferno6–90.0017%28 Sept →
mirage11–130.0233%23 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0427%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0036%19 Sept →
cache8–130.0033%19 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.2217%19 Sept →
ancient13–70.0822%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0414%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.1032%18 Sept →
anubis13–90.1026%18 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0423%18 Sept →
ancient13–20.1022%18 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0235%18 Sept →
anubis4–130.0337%16 Sept →
inferno16–130.0122%9 Sept →
inferno9–10.0313%9 Sept →
inferno13–60.0733%9 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.2511%9 Sept →
inferno9–3-0.1039%8 Sept →
inferno9–40.1427%8 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.2429%8 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0414%5 Sept →
anubis13–110.0114%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.0514%4 Sept →
cache13–30.1229%4 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0120%2 Sept →
ancient15–150.0416%2 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0021%2 Sept →
cache13–110.0221%2 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0326%31 Aug →
anubis14–160.0916%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0620%31 Aug →
cache10–130.0616%30 Aug →
anubis11–130.0222%27 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0526%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.055%24 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0326%24 Aug →
anubis4–130.0625%24 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0633%19 Aug →
anubis13–30.2714%19 Aug →
inferno16–140.0124%19 Aug →
ancient13–20.0514%19 Aug →
cache16–140.0229%17 Aug →
cache11–130.0134%17 Aug →
anubis13–160.0121%17 Aug →
office3–130.0327%10 Aug →
debris8–80.1523%10 Aug →
vertigo5–9-0.0138%10 Aug →
ancient8–130.0211%6 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0419%6 Aug →
inferno13–40.1422%6 Aug →
inferno8–130.0220%2 Aug →
nuke10–130.0427%2 Aug →
anubis8–130.0123%2 Aug →
ancient13–110.0815%2 Aug →
anubis9–130.0626%2 Aug →
anubis13–110.0124%1 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0142%1 Aug →
anubis9–130.0017%1 Aug →
inferno13–40.0612%1 Aug →
inferno7–90.1320%29 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0113%27 Jul →
inferno6–130.029%27 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0025%27 Jul →
debris9–40.2513%27 Jul →
inferno9–60.1315%27 Jul →
eldorado9–30.1412%27 Jul →
debris9–10.169%27 Jul →
cache13–110.0118%27 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0418%22 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0511%22 Jul →
inferno7–130.0212%22 Jul →
nuke13–90.0517%22 Jul →
dust213–70.0428%22 Jul →
cache12–120.0018%22 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0112%22 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0413%22 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0433%22 Jul →
inferno15–150.0223%22 Jul →
anubis8–130.0118%21 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0318%21 Jul →
anubis13–60.0415%21 Jul →
dust213–90.0242%21 Jul →
nuke10–130.0118%21 Jul →
ancient16–130.0720%21 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.