Wa'Qeed

Wa'Qeed — CS2 Stats

FI76561199029693053[U:1:1069427325]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,154Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,989Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,394 -1,362 14 Dec – 13 Jan · 10 days played
13,14014,965peak 14,96514 Dec13 Jan
14,965Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2025-08-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate39.3%41.8%42.7%3.5% short
Shot accuracy17.9%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.830.980.990.17 short
Match win rate67.3%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWa'QeedFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim38
Positioning33
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD34–56–10Last 10034%Win rateLLWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim3.8
Utility4.6
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels1.1

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.8
Positioning3.3
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time614ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–1 · vertigo, 30 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 21 Jan →
477msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 12 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 47% over 15dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD216–1529%-0.03
ancientC219–1243%-0.03
infernoC176–1135%-0.05
vertigoB157–847%-0.02
nukeD82–625%-0.05
anubisD72–529%-0.01
dust2D51–420%-0.06
cache—20–20%-0.05
train—21–150%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.10
agency—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,884Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
5,317Matches
67.3%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 3 players
39.3%Headshot %
17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
7,737MVPs
1,021Hours (in match)
3,706Bombs planted
442Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,447
AWP6,961
SSG 082,012
P901,415
FAMAS1,328

Lifetime map wins

10,002vertigo
3,200inferno
864dust2
572nuke
320train
211lake
201office
114italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
618msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
3.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.553° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2147% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7136 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.049%3 Nov →
vertigo9–13-0.0316%7 Oct →
vertigo13–7-0.035%7 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0720%6 Oct →
vertigo9–130.008%15 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0325%12 May →
ancient12–16-0.059%10 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0315%10 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0516%1 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0313%28 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0317%28 Jan →
nuke13–8-0.0116%25 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.1011%24 Jan →
inferno13–6-0.0610%24 Jan →
vertigo13–110.0014%22 Jan →
anubis6–13-0.016%21 Jan →
inferno13–5-0.0132%21 Jan →
mirage12–120.0014%19 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0415%18 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0824%13 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0931%13 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.025%12 Jan →
dust22–13-0.090%12 Jan →
ancient13–3-0.023%11 Jan →
nuke15–15-0.027%11 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0414%11 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0714%8 Jan →
ancient7–1-0.028%8 Jan →
mirage2–13-0.046%8 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0311%7 Jan →
vertigo12–120.0119%7 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.047%6 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0314%6 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0513%6 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0814%5 Jan →
ancient13–20.0216%5 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.058%5 Jan →
ancient13–70.0813%2 Jan →
vertigo10–13-0.049%2 Jan →
ancient0–13-0.1113%2 Jan →
anubis12–12-0.0213%2 Jan →
ancient13–6-0.0028%28 Dec →
mirage13–60.0111%28 Dec →
nuke8–8-0.0314%17 Dec →
train13–160.0016%16 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.0113%16 Dec →
mirage13–90.0021%16 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0816%15 Dec →
inferno15–15-0.0513%15 Dec →
nuke2–13-0.116%15 Dec →
inferno2–13-0.0724%15 Dec →
inferno13–6-0.009%14 Dec →
nuke15–15-0.0313%14 Dec →
mirage3–13-0.0922%14 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0315%14 Dec →
ancient1–13-0.0513%14 Dec →
mirage16–13-0.0120%14 Dec →
ancient4–13-0.0216%14 Dec →
overpass2–13-0.1012%11 Dec →
ancient13–70.068%11 Dec →
inferno6–13-0.0516%11 Dec →
inferno15–15-0.054%10 Dec →
mirage13–11-0.0211%10 Dec →
agency8–13-0.065%7 Dec →
mirage8–13-0.127%5 Dec →
dust25–13-0.0717%30 Nov →
mirage13–70.058%30 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0819%30 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0511%30 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0518%23 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.1118%20 Nov →
train13–11-0.0410%20 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.038%20 Nov →
anubis13–40.069%17 Nov →
vertigo13–5-0.085%8 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.056%8 Nov →
mirage12–12-0.035%3 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0516%3 Nov →
vertigo13–10.0911%30 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0611%30 Oct →
anubis13–110.019%19 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0417%19 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0419%15 Oct →
vertigo5–13-0.0617%12 Oct →
vertigo4–13-0.0616%29 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0413%29 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.037%26 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.069%26 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.018%22 Sept →
mirage8–130.0415%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0316%19 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0212%8 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0617%19 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0714%19 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0922%15 Aug →
vertigo13–40.0222%15 Aug →
vertigo6–20.0316%15 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.095%14 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.1020%14 Aug →
ancient5–130.0014%10 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.