♿whocares♿

♿whocares♿ — CS2 Stats

PS76561199023532567[U:1:1063266839]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

839Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,767Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,608Purple band · top ~22% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 839 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,608 -2,435 24 Jul – 30 Oct · 33 days played
15,10420,365peak 20,36524 Jul30 Oct
20,365Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,757 below peak (20,365)
  • -37 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,904 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,392 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate38.8%41.3%41.8%3.0% short
Shot accuracy10.1%12.7%12.2%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.160.950.98above
Match win rate45.4%42.6%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♿whocares♿FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER16,608 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning57
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time516ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 29 Sept →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 8 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 7 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC229–1341%-0.01
cacheC198–1142%0.01
dust2B189–950%-0.01
infernoA148–657%0.01
ancientA116–555%-0.01
nukeS118–373%0.01
anubisD51–420%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,205Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
2,297Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
38.8%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
4,345MVPs
939Hours (in match)
2,629Bombs planted
683Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,585nuke
1,864inferno
1,726dust2
1,583vertigo
1,305train
80cbble
35bank
35safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
0%Win rate
0.60Avg K/D
—ADR
25%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
510msReaction time
59.2%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
14.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4298 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.9868% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.025%19 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0310%19 Oct →
mirage13–90.079%13 Oct →
mirage3–130.0017%13 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0015%11 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0318%11 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0323%7 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.025%7 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0522%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.0512%7 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0321%5 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0410%5 Oct →
cache11–130.0315%5 Oct →
nuke13–90.0819%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0620%4 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.009%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0220%3 Oct →
cache13–90.0617%3 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0222%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.018%3 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0120%3 Oct →
dust216–140.0427%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0015%1 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1213%1 Oct →
inferno13–60.0521%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0213%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0324%30 Sept →
inferno16–120.0716%30 Sept →
inferno13–90.005%29 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0113%29 Sept →
anubis13–40.0912%29 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0417%29 Sept →
nuke13–10.063%26 Sept →
dust213–10.0629%26 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.039%26 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.047%25 Sept →
dust213–0-0.0413%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0124%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0220%25 Sept →
inferno6–130.0115%25 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0714%25 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.029%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0110%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.0318%23 Sept →
cache3–00.050%23 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0112%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0516%22 Sept →
dust213–70.019%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0618%17 Sept →
dust27–13-0.009%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0619%17 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0116%17 Sept →
inferno16–140.0415%16 Sept →
ancient13–110.0128%16 Sept →
ancient7–130.0110%16 Sept →
nuke13–30.0127%12 Sept →
dust213–60.0114%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0813%12 Sept →
cache13–50.0134%8 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0417%8 Sept →
mirage3–130.0229%8 Sept →
mirage14–160.004%7 Sept →
cache11–130.0422%7 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0412%7 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0516%7 Sept →
dust213–80.0112%5 Sept →
mirage13–30.0626%5 Sept →
mirage13–90.0114%5 Sept →
nuke13–80.0018%5 Sept →
dust29–130.0319%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.037%5 Sept →
cache11–130.0311%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.007%3 Sept →
dust21–130.0516%3 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0810%3 Sept →
dust211–13-0.088%3 Sept →
ancient15–150.0219%3 Sept →
inferno13–80.0215%31 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.029%31 Aug →
cache8–13-0.029%31 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0118%31 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0414%31 Aug →
mirage8–120.0326%30 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0016%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0728%29 Aug →
cache6–130.0211%29 Aug →
inferno5–130.0222%29 Aug →
cache13–11-0.048%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0112%29 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0418%18 Aug →
cache11–130.0114%18 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0318%10 Aug →
inferno13–20.0115%8 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0316%8 Aug →
cache14–160.0314%8 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0210%26 Jul →
anubis11–130.0028%26 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0627%25 Jul →
cache8–13-0.034%25 Jul →
cache16–140.0719%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.