denten

denten — CS2 Stats

MN76561199014228410[U:1:1053962682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

969Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,564Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 2 · 748 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 748 → 748
+52Tracked matches · now 969
+3.8ppWin rate · 42.9% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 748 +0 14 Sept – 24 Sept · 3 observations
748748peak 74814 Sept24 Sept
748Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2025-09-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 748
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches61——
Win rate41%——
K/D0.48——
Headshot %39%——

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,124), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate39.8%41.3%41.8%2.1% short
Shot accuracy8.5%12.7%12.2%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.710.950.980.27 short
Match win rate41.9%42.6%43.3%1.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 3 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdentenFACEITLevel 2 · 748 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPEAK ELO748csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning45
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateWWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +5.6pp headshot accuracy · +125ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim3.4
Utility1.9
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning4.5
Utility1.9
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time635ms−134ms
first ⅓ avg 769ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 7 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · vertigo, 2 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 7 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 10ancientWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2912–1741%-0.05
mirageC219–1243%-0.05
ancientC197–1237%-0.04
anubisA106–460%-0.01
infernoC94–544%-0.05
nuke—41–325%-0.08
cache—31–233%-0.05
train—21–150%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.10
office—10–10%-0.10
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,145Lifetime kills
0.71K/D
2,181Matches
41.9%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
8.5%Shot accuracy
4,783MVPs
871Hours (in match)
1,514Bombs planted
331Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,211dust2
1,884inferno
1,475vertigo
857nuke
145train
74office
16ar_shoots
14safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

392Matches
48%Win rate
0.75Avg K/D
69.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10350%0.7612.7
Ancient8748%0.8012.9
Dust26949%0.7312.3
Anubis4250%0.7612.9
Inferno3850%0.7712.9
Nuke1850%0.6711.4
Cache1644%0.9012.0
Overpass520%0.6410.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
26.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
65.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
628msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
8.49HE damage / grenade
3.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.469 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8378% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0233%25 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0724%25 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0716%25 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0415%22 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0412%22 Oct →
mirage16–19-0.0615%22 Oct →
anubis13–60.0620%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0119%20 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0415%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.074%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0112%1 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0411%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0425%1 Oct →
dust211–8-0.097%12 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.076%11 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0924%11 Sept →
dust22–13-0.070%11 Sept →
dust213–11-0.096%3 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.1023%18 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.034%17 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0717%17 Aug →
mirage13–60.0316%15 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0413%12 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0918%8 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.067%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0426%7 Aug →
mirage13–10.0724%7 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0520%7 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.054%7 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0116%6 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0118%6 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0416%6 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0623%6 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0813%2 Aug →
vertigo2–13-0.1050%2 Aug →
dust213–70.0111%1 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0620%1 Aug →
dust213–4-0.068%27 Jul →
ancient23–25-0.0615%27 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0311%27 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.110%27 Jul →
dust212–12-0.079%24 Jul →
anubis10–130.007%12 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0411%12 Jul →
anubis13–50.0413%12 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0318%12 Jul →
dust212–13-0.1019%6 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0417%5 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0015%5 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0413%5 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.018%4 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0018%4 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0616%14 May →
mirage13–10-0.049%29 Apr →
cache12–12-0.0416%29 Apr →
cache13–11-0.068%29 Apr →
dust26–13-0.076%25 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0912%12 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0710%18 Jan →
inferno13–6-0.0213%24 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.068%23 Dec →
train1–7-0.0525%17 Dec →
dust211–13-0.0911%5 Dec →
ancient2–13-0.1110%26 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0627%17 Nov →
ancient2–13-0.058%12 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0414%12 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.064%12 Nov →
dust213–20.0613%12 Nov →
train13–10-0.065%5 Nov →
mirage0–8-0.080%5 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0416%5 Nov →
ancient13–3-0.0223%5 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0121%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0212%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0430%15 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0716%10 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0814%10 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0016%10 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0713%9 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0511%8 Oct →
anubis3–130.0010%8 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0316%8 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0319%8 Oct →
office1–13-0.1029%3 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0633%3 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0712%3 Oct →
ancient9–130.058%2 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0114%2 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0430%1 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.120%1 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0710%1 Oct →
dust212–12-0.1011%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0815%28 Sept →
dust28–10.0710%28 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0324%28 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.1338%28 Sept →
overpass6–13-0.0212%24 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.1311%24 Sept →
ancient9–5-0.048%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.