WeNyt

WeNyt — CS2 Stats

UA76561198331150423[U:1:370884695]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

506Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
876Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 506
+3.7ppWin rate · 48.1% → 51.8%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 983 +0 14 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
983983peak 98314 Sept20 Sept
983Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-08-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches58——
Win rate48%——
K/D0.87——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 25 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate40.0%44.8%45.7%5.7% short
Shot accuracy1.1%12.4%12.7%11.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.031.05above
Match win rate47.6%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWeNytFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO983csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWLWLLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +6.4pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time527ms−118ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 21 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 19 Oct →
320msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · ancient, 19 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 29dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2917–1259%0.00
cacheC167–944%-0.01
ancientC156–940%-0.01
dust2C135–838%-0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.02
infernoA95–456%-0.01
nuke—30–30%-0.01
boulder—10–10%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,976Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
759Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
40.0%Headshot %
1.1%Shot accuracy
2,354MVPs
461Hours (in match)
572Bombs planted
274Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,080dust2
637inferno
350nuke
85vertigo
68train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

195Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7053%1.0815.0
Ancient4151%1.1116.6
Dust22454%0.9815.2
Anubis2133%1.0016.6
Inferno1947%1.0215.5
Cache944%1.0514.6
Nuke967%0.9011.4
Train10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
528msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
7.15HE damage / grenade
10.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.7581% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0231%25 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.130%24 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0319%23 Oct →
cache11–13-0.037%21 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0011%21 Oct →
cache13–110.0522%21 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.0850%19 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0616%19 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0618%19 Oct →
cache12–120.0815%16 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0813%10 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.058%7 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.025%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.039%1 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.017%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0113%30 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0125%29 Sept →
nuke12–120.0514%28 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0114%28 Sept →
mirage16–140.0517%28 Sept →
inferno13–100.0020%27 Sept →
ancient13–20.0227%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0819%26 Sept →
cache13–100.0212%24 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0318%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0416%23 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.038%22 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0314%22 Sept →
ancient13–30.1316%21 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0018%20 Sept →
anubis11–130.0110%20 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0411%15 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0322%12 Sept →
mirage13–60.1113%11 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.214%11 Sept →
inferno9–60.0315%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0211%9 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0521%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0412%6 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0210%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.1116%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0732%6 Sept →
dust213–00.059%6 Sept →
mirage7–130.0312%6 Sept →
anubis13–110.0923%5 Sept →
ancient9–130.0313%3 Sept →
anubis19–15-0.0114%3 Sept →
ancient13–60.0121%3 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0221%1 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0118%1 Sept →
ancient13–110.0917%31 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0014%30 Aug →
mirage13–20.0416%30 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0810%25 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0811%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0630%25 Aug →
cache13–8-0.026%25 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0115%19 Aug →
cache1–2-0.160%19 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0616%19 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.048%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0511%17 Aug →
inferno9–130.0913%17 Aug →
dust23–130.014%14 Aug →
anubis16–140.039%12 Aug →
dust214–160.0213%11 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0611%10 Aug →
mirage7–130.0225%10 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0027%10 Aug →
inferno16–140.0119%9 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.008%8 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.027%8 Aug →
cache8–130.018%8 Aug →
mirage4–00.119%8 Aug →
mirage13–30.0543%8 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0415%8 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0016%8 Aug →
inferno1–8-0.0218%7 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0317%7 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.048%7 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0213%7 Aug →
mirage13–1-0.0013%7 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.026%7 Aug →
inferno13–60.0620%7 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0513%6 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0417%6 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0516%6 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.049%6 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0421%5 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0413%4 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0516%4 Aug →
anubis13–40.0415%4 Aug →
mirage13–80.0313%4 Aug →
mirage13–40.1113%4 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0213%4 Aug →
boulder5–13-0.0322%3 Aug →
cache13–90.0616%3 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0514%3 Aug →
vertigo13–9-0.088%2 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0615%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.