4ramon7

4ramon7 — CS2 Stats

MN76561198314314251[U:1:354048523]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

958Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,115Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+11Tracked matches · now 958
−3.6ppWin rate · 46.4% → 42.9%

Rating over time

1,114Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-08

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches117——
Win rate54%——
K/D1.16——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 25 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,573), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate38.0%45.7%46.8%8.9% short
Shot accuracy12.1%12.7%13.0%0.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.211.051.06above
Match win rate56.8%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG4ramon7FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,114csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning61
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–47–7Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 1–2 · cache, 19 Aug →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 30 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 29 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3315–1845%0.00
dust2A149–564%0.05
anubisD133–1023%-0.00
cacheA127–558%0.04
ancientA106–460%0.03
infernoD103–730%0.00
nukeC52–340%-0.04
train—31–233%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,732Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2,866Matches
56.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 7 players
38.0%Headshot %
12.1%Shot accuracy
8,614MVPs
1,115Hours (in match)
2,945Bombs planted
976Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,569dust2
5,211inferno
1,229nuke
1,205vertigo
344train
188cbble
45dust
32office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches
54%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
89.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2564%1.2016.3
Ancient2245%1.1816.2
Dust21650%1.5020.6
Anubis1242%0.9917.4
Inferno967%1.2516.4
Nuke633%1.1918.8
Cache475%1.1013.8
Overpass1100%2.0018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
587msReaction time
53.7%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.76HE damage / grenade
6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7315% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.7512% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0711%23 Oct →
cache11–130.0124%23 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0213%23 Oct →
mirage13–110.0111%23 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0510%22 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0114%22 Oct →
cache13–110.0717%21 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0110%21 Oct →
ancient13–70.0215%21 Oct →
dust27–130.0517%21 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.029%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0321%20 Oct →
nuke0–8-0.100%20 Oct →
mirage8–130.0017%20 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0215%18 Oct →
anubis13–70.0315%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0610%18 Oct →
inferno13–40.079%17 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0826%16 Oct →
mirage12–120.0519%16 Oct →
cache10–20.0031%16 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0613%16 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0711%14 Oct →
nuke11–2-0.0614%14 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0110%13 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0113%13 Oct →
train2–130.0224%10 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0114%10 Oct →
mirage13–80.0713%9 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0014%4 Oct →
train8–13-0.049%3 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0311%3 Oct →
dust213–90.0714%3 Oct →
dust213–00.1617%2 Oct →
train13–30.0217%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0316%1 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0117%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0619%1 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0034%30 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.043%29 Sept →
dust211–130.0410%29 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.017%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.0115%28 Sept →
nuke12–120.0314%28 Sept →
inferno13–100.0417%27 Sept →
inferno6–90.0526%26 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0221%26 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.023%26 Sept →
ancient13–20.1214%26 Sept →
cache13–100.0618%24 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0110%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.039%23 Sept →
inferno8–130.018%23 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0413%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0613%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0923%22 Sept →
ancient13–30.1122%21 Sept →
anubis11–130.0519%21 Sept →
dust213–70.0312%20 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0212%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0115%20 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0521%17 Sept →
dust213–00.2019%15 Sept →
inferno5–130.0011%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0722%15 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0121%15 Sept →
anubis15–19-0.0113%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0313%12 Sept →
mirage13–60.0516%11 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0320%11 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0417%7 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0317%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0616%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0619%6 Sept →
dust213–00.0519%6 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0115%3 Sept →
anubis19–150.0218%3 Sept →
dust213–80.0012%1 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0520%30 Aug →
mirage13–20.1011%30 Aug →
cache10–60.0312%28 Aug →
anubis6–130.0523%28 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0118%28 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0426%20 Aug →
ancient12–120.0423%19 Aug →
mirage13–100.0025%19 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.056%19 Aug →
cache1–20.3318%19 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.018%19 Aug →
anubis10–130.0113%19 Aug →
mirage6–130.0125%15 Aug →
mirage13–100.1113%11 Aug →
dust212–120.0816%10 Aug →
ancient13–100.0317%8 Aug →
cache13–10-0.037%8 Aug →
mirage7–8-0.1114%8 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0020%8 Aug →
mirage4–0-0.0725%8 Aug →
mirage13–30.0513%8 Aug →
mirage5–130.0621%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.