fantasma | CSFIT

fantasma | CSFIT — CS2 Stats

CY76561199001359272[U:1:1041093544]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

449Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,447Hours in CS65Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,092Purple band · top ~16.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#96802 of 223077 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 449 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,092 +2,230 19 Aug17 Sept · 19 days played
15,00018,425peak 18,42519 Aug17 Sept
18,766Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 333 below peak (18,425)
  • +2,230 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,908 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches16
Win rate38%
K/D1.08
Headshot %40%

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate36.1%43.8%44.9%8.7% short
Shot accuracy8.6%12.0%12.4%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.021.040.13 short
Match win rate48.3%44.7%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfantasma | CSFITFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,092 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning46
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50473Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time592ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 31 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · nuke, 4 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 4 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 28nukeWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA28171161%-0.00
mirageB1910953%0.01
nukeD1961332%-0.03
anubisD93633%0.02
dust2A95456%-0.02
ancientA95456%0.01
cacheB63350%-0.01
office110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,976Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,783Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
36.1%Headshot %
8.6%Shot accuracy
3,853MVPs
825Hours (in match)
2,116Bombs planted
507Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,504inferno
3,028dust2
1,567nuke
306office
246train
124vertigo
24lake
23cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
46%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
71.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis520%0.9514.0
Dust2475%1.0914.0
Mirage30%0.7111.3
Nuke1100%1.3316.0
Cache10%0.8815.0
Inferno1100%1.0021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
606msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.80HE damage / grenade
4.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5199% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–140.0217%16 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0613%16 Sept
anubis11–130.0128%16 Sept
anubis8–130.0311%16 Sept
anubis11–130.0320%16 Sept
mirage5–0-0.090%12 Sept
mirage3–130.0111%12 Sept
nuke12–12-0.017%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.0520%11 Sept
ancient13–70.0422%11 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0318%11 Sept
nuke2–130.0316%11 Sept
dust213–5-0.029%10 Sept
mirage7–13-0.057%10 Sept
dust213–110.0615%10 Sept
ancient13–10-0.019%9 Sept
anubis13–110.048%9 Sept
nuke12–12-0.029%9 Sept
inferno6–130.0813%9 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0413%8 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0120%8 Sept
anubis13–30.0435%8 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0313%8 Sept
anubis10–130.0615%7 Sept
dust216–14-0.0220%7 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0026%7 Sept
inferno13–60.0121%7 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0520%7 Sept
cache10–13-0.018%7 Sept
inferno9–4-0.0721%7 Sept
inferno13–30.0419%7 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0231%7 Sept
cache4–13-0.0422%6 Sept
cache13–10-0.019%6 Sept
inferno13–40.0821%6 Sept
inferno9–3-0.0126%6 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0226%5 Sept
dust214–16-0.0430%5 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0616%5 Sept
anubis8–130.0012%5 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1514%5 Sept
nuke13–110.0325%4 Sept
mirage13–40.1031%4 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0319%4 Sept
nuke2–9-0.0450%4 Sept
inferno9–4-0.0131%4 Sept
mirage8–130.1310%4 Sept
inferno9–13-0.057%3 Sept
cache13–7-0.0318%3 Sept
inferno14–160.0014%3 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0139%3 Sept
office13–50.0520%2 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0611%1 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0117%1 Sept
nuke11–130.0311%1 Sept
dust212–120.037%1 Sept
mirage5–130.0332%31 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0327%31 Aug
mirage13–90.0018%31 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0219%31 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0511%31 Aug
inferno9–10.1412%31 Aug
cache14–16-0.0314%30 Aug
ancient13–30.0822%30 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0233%30 Aug
inferno6–130.0321%30 Aug
dust213–9-0.0214%30 Aug
mirage11–130.1323%29 Aug
dust213–8-0.0317%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0211%29 Aug
inferno10–13-0.019%29 Aug
inferno13–70.0222%29 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0614%27 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0216%27 Aug
cache13–00.0435%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0114%24 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0429%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0717%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0341%22 Aug
ancient7–130.0116%22 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0314%22 Aug
mirage16–120.0223%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0610%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0517%22 Aug
mirage12–10.0331%22 Aug
nuke0–10-0.0611%22 Aug
nuke4–9-0.1613%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0717%20 Aug
mirage13–60.0410%20 Aug
nuke9–6-0.0111%20 Aug
nuke13–50.018%20 Aug
nuke5–13-0.105%20 Aug
inferno13–10.0617%20 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0421%19 Aug
inferno8–130.0430%19 Aug
inferno13–110.0414%19 Aug
mirage13–40.0722%19 Aug
ancient13–40.0015%19 Aug
ancient11–130.0411%19 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0517%18 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →