Lucid

Lucid — CS2 Stats

TV76561199000707712[U:1:1040441984]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

183Tracked matches67%Win rate2026Tracked since
75Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,702Blue band · top ~40.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 183 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,702 -867 30 Jul – 31 Oct · 33 days played
10,43315,423peak 15,42330 Jul31 Oct
15,524Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,721 below peak (15,423)
  • -325 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,269 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,298 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-10-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate44.4%42.0%44.4%meets
Shot accuracy3.0%9.6%11.9%8.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.240.981.03above
Match win rate44.7%43.8%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLucidPREMIER12,702 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning74
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.4
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels6.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning7.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels9.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time558ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 13 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 7 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 31 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 34mirageWeakest map · 33% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3421–1362%0.04
mirageD248–1633%0.02
anubisB178–947%0.02
infernoB136–746%0.05
ancientB63–350%-0.01
cache—41–325%0.02
nuke—22–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

3,927Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 10% of Blue band
215Matches
44.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
3.0%Shot accuracy
615MVPs
75Hours (in match)
233Bombs planted
79Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

899dust2
186inferno
21nuke
16italy
15vertigo
2safehouse
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
558msReaction time
69.3%T opening success
62.7%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
8.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4895 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0926%26 Oct →
mirage7–130.1018%16 Oct →
dust213–80.0420%14 Oct →
dust213–00.0814%14 Oct →
dust213–70.0123%13 Oct →
dust213–20.1318%6 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0114%6 Oct →
anubis4–130.0310%28 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0117%28 Sept →
dust213–30.1324%28 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0227%27 Sept →
nuke13–80.026%26 Sept →
ancient10–130.0019%26 Sept →
nuke8–00.0210%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0812%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0210%22 Sept →
dust213–50.1716%22 Sept →
anubis13–80.0421%21 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0114%21 Sept →
inferno13–110.0115%21 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.1113%20 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0628%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0717%19 Sept →
dust213–10.0913%19 Sept →
dust213–20.044%19 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0327%19 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0329%18 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0317%18 Sept →
mirage13–40.1319%18 Sept →
dust213–20.0633%15 Sept →
inferno10–130.0617%15 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0213%14 Sept →
inferno8–130.0312%13 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0221%13 Sept →
anubis8–130.0523%11 Sept →
ancient7–130.0423%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.0722%11 Sept →
mirage5–130.0423%11 Sept →
dust26–130.0429%10 Sept →
mirage8–130.0011%10 Sept →
cache9–130.0819%10 Sept →
dust28–130.1019%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0426%9 Sept →
mirage0–7-0.0428%9 Sept →
inferno15–150.1018%7 Sept →
dust27–130.0615%5 Sept →
inferno13–10.1933%5 Sept →
mirage9–130.0114%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0022%4 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0018%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0833%31 Aug →
inferno10–130.0720%29 Aug →
mirage10–130.018%27 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0315%27 Aug →
anubis0–13-0.0325%27 Aug →
inferno12–160.0616%27 Aug →
mirage13–80.0112%27 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0222%27 Aug →
anubis6–130.0712%27 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0215%27 Aug →
mirage11–130.0120%23 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0610%23 Aug →
anubis11–130.0113%22 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.046%22 Aug →
ancient16–120.0417%22 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0819%21 Aug →
anubis4–130.0018%19 Aug →
cache9–130.0313%15 Aug →
anubis13–80.1719%15 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0226%15 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0011%15 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0619%15 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0010%13 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0516%13 Aug →
dust213–50.0514%13 Aug →
dust213–00.2629%13 Aug →
dust213–110.0015%8 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0821%8 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0738%7 Aug →
mirage9–40.0428%7 Aug →
dust25–130.0818%7 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0527%7 Aug →
anubis10–130.0216%5 Aug →
dust213–40.0123%5 Aug →
inferno13–30.0223%5 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0019%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0715%2 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0722%2 Aug →
dust210–00.1330%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0821%31 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0816%31 Jul →
dust213–60.0313%31 Jul →
mirage13–60.0222%30 Jul →
dust213–80.0215%29 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0424%29 Jul →
mirage8–20.1216%29 Jul →
inferno8–130.0919%28 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.109%28 Jul →
anubis13–40.0310%23 Jul →
mirage13–100.2016%23 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.