Zchmerkel

Zchmerkel — CS2 Stats

OM76561198995522357[U:1:1035256629]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,245Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
907Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,863 -75 18 Feb – 2 Mar · 7 days played
16,56517,248peak 17,24818 Feb2 Mar
17,248Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-01-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate60.2%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy12.6%12.7%13.0%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.791.051.06above
Match win rate47.4%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZchmerkelFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning36
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–55–5Last 10040%Win rateWWTLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.0
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time589ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–7 · vertigo, 13 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · mirage, 5 May →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 14 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 4 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD186–1233%-0.02
ancientC177–1041%-0.01
infernoD155–1033%-0.01
anubisD134–931%-0.02
dust2D93–633%-0.01
vertigoB84–450%-0.03
overpassS64–267%0.02
cacheC52–340%-0.04
nukeA53–260%-0.02
train—22–0100%0.02
shelter—10–10%0.04
office—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,269Lifetime kills
1.79K/D · Top 5% of Level 7 players
2,788Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
60.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
12.6%Shot accuracy
7,353MVPs
907Hours (in match)
1,965Bombs planted
591Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,304inferno
2,180vertigo
1,572nuke
1,423dust2
771train
653cbble
374office
282lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
62%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2864%1.0313.5
Ancient2065%1.0415.1
Dust21354%0.9311.9
Nuke967%1.0713.3
Anubis862%0.9913.1
Cache757%0.8512.9
Overpass757%0.8311.4
Inferno650%1.4715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
584msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
31.7%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
10.71HE damage / grenade
9.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4962 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1147% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0118%14 Oct →
train9–2-0.019%13 Oct →
mirage12–120.0622%13 Oct →
shelter10–130.0416%13 Oct →
vertigo9–70.1113%13 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.019%7 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0330%15 Sept →
cache13–80.019%15 Sept →
anubis10–130.0114%15 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0013%5 Aug →
inferno13–60.0121%2 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.1010%22 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0716%22 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0511%22 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0521%15 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0714%15 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0712%10 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0611%10 Jul →
mirage13–50.0429%10 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.115%6 Jul →
mirage13–40.0231%5 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0516%5 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.068%1 Jul →
dust211–130.0420%22 Jun →
dust213–110.0213%9 Jun →
vertigo3–130.0015%28 May →
inferno11–13-0.0323%28 May →
cache8–13-0.0818%26 May →
mirage0–2-0.03100%5 May →
cache13–1-0.0514%4 May →
mirage13–80.0121%3 May →
ancient11–13-0.0510%27 Apr →
train13–100.0528%26 Apr →
vertigo13–80.0118%26 Apr →
office6–13-0.0125%26 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0310%2 Mar →
mirage17–19-0.038%2 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.015%1 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0329%27 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0118%27 Feb →
overpass13–70.0319%27 Feb →
ancient13–90.0510%27 Feb →
dust27–13-0.025%27 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.046%27 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0213%27 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.079%26 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0215%26 Feb →
ancient13–3-0.0111%25 Feb →
ancient8–130.0112%19 Feb →
inferno9–130.037%19 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0222%19 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0311%19 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0314%19 Feb →
nuke16–12-0.0013%18 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.049%18 Feb →
anubis13–90.0320%18 Feb →
overpass13–80.0316%18 Feb →
anubis13–100.0123%18 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0915%17 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0710%15 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0411%14 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0413%14 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0114%14 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0516%14 Feb →
ancient7–130.0313%14 Feb →
overpass15–150.0214%14 Feb →
ancient13–60.0119%14 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.1218%13 Feb →
anubis13–80.0312%13 Feb →
inferno13–30.1013%13 Feb →
overpass13–30.0412%13 Feb →
inferno15–150.0117%13 Feb →
vertigo13–6-0.0513%13 Feb →
vertigo13–8-0.0610%13 Feb →
vertigo13–16-0.0427%13 Feb →
nuke10–130.0314%13 Feb →
vertigo6–13-0.106%11 Feb →
dust25–5-0.0110%11 Feb →
nuke16–12-0.0224%11 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0810%9 Feb →
ancient4–130.005%9 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.039%9 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0212%8 Feb →
inferno9–60.099%4 Feb →
ancient15–150.0413%3 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0319%3 Feb →
overpass16–13-0.0518%3 Feb →
overpass10–130.0413%2 Feb →
inferno13–30.0421%2 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0419%30 Jan →
mirage10–130.0924%30 Jan →
mirage11–130.0022%30 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0910%30 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0313%30 Jan →
anubis12–16-0.0217%30 Jan →
inferno13–3-0.0320%29 Jan →
ancient13–40.0912%29 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0614%29 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.0215%27 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0217%26 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.