midomodo

midomodo — CS2 Stats

FI76561198990799432[U:1:1030533704]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,516Tracked matches54%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,236Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,896Purple band · top ~20.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,896 +1,390 25 Jul – 1 Nov · 22 days played
15,16517,049peak 17,04925 Jul1 Nov
17,368Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 153 below peak (17,049)
  • +913 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,104 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate61.3%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.6%12.4%12.7%12.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.251.031.05above
Match win rate53.0%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmidomodoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,896 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning56
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWWLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 99% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time559ms−103ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 31 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · train, 29 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · nuke, 3 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · train, 12 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2411–1346%0.00
nukeA1811–761%-0.01
ancientD165–1131%-0.01
cacheA138–562%-0.03
mirageD112–918%-0.02
anubisA85–363%-0.03
trainD62–433%-0.03
dust2—21–150%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,425Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
2,910Matches
53.0%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players
61.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 6 players
0.6%Shot accuracy
7,317MVPs
716Hours (in match)
966Bombs planted
1,188Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,530nuke
3,770inferno
1,542train
844dust2
243vertigo
155office
61italy
8militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
55%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

18%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno743%1.1017.1
Ancient6100%1.3415.3
Mirage560%1.0414.2
Cache450%1.0917.8
Nuke450%1.2512.8
Overpass333%0.8011.3
Anubis250%1.0516.0
Dust210%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
572msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
6.51HE damage / grenade
8.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–4-0.0527%1 Nov →
ancient13–60.0614%1 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0523%1 Nov →
nuke7–90.0113%31 Oct →
inferno9–20.2219%31 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.0119%31 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0323%30 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0115%30 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.069%30 Oct →
train3–13-0.0641%29 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.1015%28 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0121%28 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0029%28 Oct →
inferno9–20.0931%28 Oct →
inferno9–30.0322%28 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.1821%28 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0616%28 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0020%26 Oct →
cache10–130.0229%25 Oct →
ancient15–150.029%25 Oct →
inferno15–150.0314%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0024%23 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0415%23 Oct →
mirage13–100.0114%18 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0016%18 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0311%18 Oct →
train9–13-0.0122%14 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.038%14 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0714%14 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0518%13 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0220%13 Oct →
train13–60.0622%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.0321%12 Oct →
train13–10.038%12 Oct →
anubis13–80.0122%12 Oct →
train4–13-0.1110%11 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0426%7 Oct →
train3–13-0.0825%7 Oct →
mirage5–10-0.039%6 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0318%5 Oct →
cache13–40.0318%5 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.056%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.0116%3 Oct →
inferno13–30.1210%3 Oct →
anubis5–130.0018%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.018%3 Oct →
nuke9–20.2027%3 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0430%26 Sept →
anubis13–80.0116%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0219%20 Sept →
ancient2–130.0314%20 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0724%20 Sept →
mirage14–160.0122%19 Sept →
inferno8–130.0120%19 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0419%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0226%18 Sept →
nuke13–80.0315%18 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0817%18 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0413%18 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.2227%18 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1736%18 Sept →
overpass9–30.0213%18 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.1521%5 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0915%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.0018%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0219%3 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0533%29 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0420%28 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0538%28 Aug →
ancient7–130.0121%19 Aug →
nuke13–100.0226%19 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0418%19 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0225%18 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0213%18 Aug →
ancient6–1-0.060%18 Aug →
cache10–13-0.1211%11 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0521%11 Aug →
ancient15–150.0020%4 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.065%3 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0321%31 Jul →
ancient9–130.0519%31 Jul →
ancient7–130.0313%28 Jul →
cache13–20.0121%28 Jul →
nuke14–16-0.0010%27 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0611%26 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0715%26 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0119%25 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0215%25 Jul →
inferno13–50.0833%25 Jul →
cache8–130.0140%25 Jul →
inferno8–80.1421%25 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0517%25 Jul →
inferno13–20.119%25 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0210%24 Jul →
nuke2–5-0.0424%24 Jul →
inferno8–80.0617%24 Jul →
nuke9–70.0313%24 Jul →
inferno9–70.096%24 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.1618%24 Jul →
overpass9–60.0714%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.