dqlmq

dqlmq — CS2 Stats

UA76561198983854711[U:1:1023588983]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,024Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,701Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,820Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7780 of 261624 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,454 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,820 +4,267 24 Mar – 11 Nov · 21 days played
22,55327,251peak 27,25124 Mar11 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,454 +0 30 Aug – 1 Nov · 9 observations
2,4542,454peak 2,45430 Aug1 Nov
27,251Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,454Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2026-03-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,454
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 431 below peak (27,251)
  • -431 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,218 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,180 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate55.2%50.9%
Shot accuracy10.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.081.09
Match win rate45.5%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdqlmqFACEITLevel 10 · 2,454 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,820 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,454csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning78
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateTWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility4.1
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels7.7
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning7.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels9.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 8.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time543ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · vertigo, 28 Aug →
51%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · vertigo, 26 Mar →
438msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 5 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7dust2Weakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C219–1243%0.03
ancientB199–1047%0.02
mirageB179–853%0.04
anubisA116–555%0.01
vertigoA116–555%0.04
cacheA74–357%0.03
inferno—41–325%0.04
train—32–167%0.07
nuke—32–167%0.05
overpass—22–0100%0.10
office—10–10%0.09
italy—10–10%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

260,833Lifetime kills
1.08K/D
5,968Matches
45.5%Match win rate
55.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
10.5%Shot accuracy
27,039MVPs
7,503Hours (in match)
5,741Bombs planted
5,229Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4793,755
AWP49,644
P2503,467
SSG 083,137
MP92,655

Lifetime map wins

12,895dust2
6,951inferno
2,992nuke
1,790vertigo
1,015train
257office
60cbble
41lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,035Matches
51%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
91.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26250%1.4220.1
Dust220652%1.3720.0
Ancient12052%1.2719.3
Anubis7247%1.4818.5
Inferno6946%1.3718.6
Nuke2361%1.3219.5
Overpass1953%1.2817.6
Train1164%1.1916.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
91.7%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
544msReaction time
67.0%T opening success
68.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.41HE damage / grenade
2.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9354 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–80.0119%12 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0116%12 Nov →
dust26–130.0327%11 Nov →
dust213–90.0932%11 Nov →
mirage13–90.0215%7 Nov →
mirage9–130.0425%7 Nov →
dust213–110.0829%6 Nov →
dust29–130.0328%5 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0127%3 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0521%2 Nov →
dust213–110.0126%24 Oct →
ancient10–130.0418%21 Oct →
cache13–20.0622%21 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0123%21 Oct →
anubis14–160.0223%18 Oct →
mirage8–130.0221%17 Oct →
overpass13–90.1225%15 Oct →
vertigo13–20.1127%15 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0320%14 Oct →
mirage13–90.0528%14 Oct →
dust213–30.1125%14 Oct →
ancient13–90.0816%12 Oct →
train13–40.1320%7 Oct →
ancient13–110.0736%7 Oct →
ancient4–130.0332%7 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0224%7 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0215%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0236%30 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0422%30 Sept →
dust213–60.1028%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.1222%25 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0527%25 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0225%24 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0713%20 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0219%20 Sept →
dust213–80.0521%15 Sept →
dust213–30.1435%14 Sept →
ancient13–70.0820%12 Sept →
mirage16–130.0124%1 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0111%31 Aug →
vertigo13–60.0222%31 Aug →
vertigo13–20.1636%28 Aug →
ancient11–130.0830%26 Aug →
mirage3–130.1026%26 Aug →
anubis2–5-0.0525%25 Aug →
cache13–70.0628%22 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0428%22 Aug →
anubis13–80.1026%22 Aug →
inferno9–130.0338%15 Aug →
nuke13–100.0244%9 Aug →
ancient13–10.0928%7 Aug →
dust22–130.0145%1 Aug →
inferno13–70.0933%1 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0434%1 Aug →
mirage13–100.0527%23 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0018%23 Jul →
mirage15–150.0227%16 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0241%16 Jul →
dust213–30.1639%10 Jul →
office8–130.0921%8 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0027%8 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0515%8 Jul →
cache12–120.0527%5 Jul →
dust212–120.0235%4 Jul →
inferno10–130.0235%25 Jun →
vertigo9–40.0125%21 Jun →
train4–13-0.0350%21 Jun →
vertigo12–12-0.0232%21 Jun →
ancient6–130.0140%21 Jun →
mirage15–150.0926%10 Jun →
nuke9–130.0021%10 Jun →
dust216–19-0.0028%29 May →
ancient11–130.0836%22 May →
train13–50.1233%18 May →
mirage13–110.0021%11 May →
dust27–130.0224%9 May →
ancient13–50.0232%4 May →
mirage12–12-0.0227%4 May →
cache13–90.0425%29 Apr →
cache13–50.0529%29 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0225%29 Apr →
anubis13–10.1423%27 Apr →
mirage11–130.0525%23 Apr →
overpass13–20.0725%22 Apr →
nuke13–60.1336%16 Apr →
italy3–130.0830%16 Apr →
ancient13–110.0420%15 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0541%15 Apr →
anubis10–130.0329%12 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0735%10 Apr →
ancient16–130.0530%9 Apr →
mirage13–90.0638%9 Apr →
vertigo4–130.0131%8 Apr →
vertigo10–13-0.0620%8 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0319%3 Apr →
mirage13–80.0327%3 Apr →
anubis13–90.0224%2 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.0012%28 Mar →
vertigo10–130.1251%26 Mar →
dust27–130.0322%24 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.