saboenoem-doestoe

saboenoem-doestoe — CS2 Stats

76561198979662468[U:1:1019396740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

982Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,187Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,150Top 10% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11602 of 247978 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 717 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,150 +3,810 5 Aug – 25 Sept · 30 days played
22,13926,162peak 26,1625 Aug25 Sept
Faceit ELO: 717 +0 10 Sept – 18 Sept · 2 observations
717717peak 71710 Sept18 Sept
26,410Peak Premier in tracked matches
717Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 717
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 12 below peak (26,162)
  • +3,985 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,850 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches94——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.05——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.4%45.7%46.8%3.5% short
Shot accuracy6.2%12.7%13.0%6.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.06 short
Match win rate45.9%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsaboenoem-doestoeFACEITLevel 7 · 717 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER26,150 · Red bandPEAK ELO717csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning58
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateWLTLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time538ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 11–1 · inferno, 25 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · cache, 2 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 30 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6nukeWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%-0.00
dust2A2213–959%0.01
infernoS1813–572%0.03
cacheC146–843%0.01
nukeD101–910%-0.01
anubisD71–614%0.01
ancientS65–183%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,592Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,866Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
43.4%Headshot %
6.2%Shot accuracy
10,393MVPs
1,797Hours (in match)
3,438Bombs planted
884Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,272dust2
5,718inferno
2,377nuke
2,139cbble
664vertigo
530train
365office
160militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

367Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5645%1.0316.2
Anubis4953%1.1317.0
Dust24643%0.9714.9
Ancient4353%1.1015.7
Inferno4353%1.2616.9
Nuke3863%0.9915.0
Cache1656%1.0014.6
Overpass838%0.7612.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
544msReaction time
51.9%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.00HE damage / grenade
13.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.448 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.0494% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0212%30 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0524%29 Sept →
mirage12–120.0024%29 Sept →
inferno11–130.0223%25 Sept →
inferno11–10.2112%25 Sept →
inferno13–1-0.0514%24 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0125%24 Sept →
inferno4–20.050%24 Sept →
dust213–6-0.040%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0529%23 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0422%23 Sept →
anubis12–120.0622%23 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0311%23 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0020%22 Sept →
mirage13–50.0928%19 Sept →
dust216–14-0.028%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.079%19 Sept →
mirage2–9-0.0414%17 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.060%13 Sept →
mirage3–130.005%13 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0510%13 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0815%12 Sept →
cache13–10.0612%12 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0017%11 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0323%11 Sept →
inferno13–70.0410%10 Sept →
mirage10–130.0723%10 Sept →
mirage13–30.0816%10 Sept →
inferno8–130.0316%9 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0718%9 Sept →
dust23–13-0.1118%9 Sept →
cache8–20.1316%9 Sept →
anubis10–130.0410%7 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0117%7 Sept →
dust23–2-0.0620%7 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0312%7 Sept →
dust213–30.0424%6 Sept →
mirage15–150.0110%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.1218%4 Sept →
dust213–80.0524%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0921%4 Sept →
nuke13–160.0221%4 Sept →
nuke5–130.0324%2 Sept →
cache12–120.0235%2 Sept →
anubis13–90.0630%1 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.1011%1 Sept →
inferno13–40.1125%1 Sept →
cache17–19-0.0116%1 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0425%31 Aug →
nuke12–120.0519%31 Aug →
mirage13–100.1118%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0922%30 Aug →
inferno13–90.0819%30 Aug →
cache13–80.0719%30 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0522%29 Aug →
dust213–90.0519%29 Aug →
mirage13–100.0317%29 Aug →
ancient13–80.0420%29 Aug →
dust25–130.0717%28 Aug →
inferno13–80.0513%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.0221%26 Aug →
nuke7–130.0222%26 Aug →
dust213–90.0417%25 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0510%25 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0415%24 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0115%24 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0323%23 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.1018%23 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0516%22 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0712%22 Aug →
cache13–110.0117%21 Aug →
dust213–70.0816%21 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0016%20 Aug →
inferno9–70.0316%20 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0112%20 Aug →
nuke9–130.0621%19 Aug →
dust213–60.1427%19 Aug →
mirage13–60.0319%18 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0418%18 Aug →
cache0–13-0.050%17 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0224%17 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0017%11 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0216%11 Aug →
dust213–110.0422%11 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0314%11 Aug →
cache6–130.0212%11 Aug →
inferno13–100.024%10 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0812%10 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0415%9 Aug →
cache4–13-0.087%9 Aug →
ancient13–100.0423%9 Aug →
inferno13–110.0116%8 Aug →
cache13–80.0716%8 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0721%7 Aug →
dust27–130.008%7 Aug →
dust213–100.0116%6 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.037%5 Aug →
anubis2–90.0219%5 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0113%4 Aug →
dust21–130.0125%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.