BottyFragger

BottyFragger — CS2 Stats

76561198299872626[U:1:339606898]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

645Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
426Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,875Purple band · top ~17% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,875 +2,242 17 Sept – 1 Oct · 11 days played
15,63318,913peak 18,91317 Sept1 Oct
19,284Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-07-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,038 below peak (18,913)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,125 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1312+1
Win rate54%58%−4pp
K/D0.620.70−0.08
Headshot %43%44%−1pp

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; previous 18 Sep 2026 → 24 Sep 2026.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches30——
Win rate57%——
K/D0.66——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,875), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.0%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.821.031.050.23 short
Match win rate49.2%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBottyFraggerFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,875 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning39
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 11% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time604ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 21 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · nuke, 10 Aug →
398msFastest reaction time · 11–1 · inferno, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 10 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
13–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2212–1055%-0.04
infernoA2011–955%-0.01
dust2C156–940%-0.03
nukeA117–464%-0.01
cacheB115–645%-0.04
anubisD93–633%-0.02
ancientS75–271%-0.01
office—20–20%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.06
vertigo—10–10%-0.11
train—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,431Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
889Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
45.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,576MVPs
426Hours (in match)
1,954Bombs planted
321Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,574dust2
1,416inferno
1,154nuke
99vertigo
76office
39train
6italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

603Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
63.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11150%0.9612.4
Dust210437%0.8812.4
Inferno9255%1.0613.6
Ancient9061%1.1715.1
Anubis8352%0.9714.0
Nuke7251%1.0213.0
Cache3951%0.8511.7
Overpass956%0.9713.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
70.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
597msReaction time
11.3%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
9.34HE damage / grenade
7.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.3075% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0327%1 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0917%1 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.038%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0623%27 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0634%26 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0021%26 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0520%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.065%25 Sept →
inferno11–1-0.036%25 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0421%25 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0515%24 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0410%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0119%23 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0614%23 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0929%22 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0638%21 Sept →
overpass9–7-0.0617%21 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0619%21 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0317%21 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0520%21 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0322%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0535%21 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0341%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0514%17 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0626%30 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0327%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0216%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0128%23 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0223%22 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0920%22 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0322%22 Aug →
nuke9–20.2012%21 Aug →
dust213–110.0527%20 Aug →
vertigo8–13-0.1110%19 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0430%19 Aug →
inferno13–70.0319%18 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0510%18 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0223%18 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0219%18 Aug →
ancient16–140.0225%17 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0420%16 Aug →
mirage13–80.0019%16 Aug →
inferno13–70.0238%16 Aug →
train12–120.0033%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0220%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0129%15 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0511%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.016%15 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0520%15 Aug →
ancient3–130.0219%15 Aug →
anubis13–110.0523%14 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0418%14 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0221%14 Aug →
ancient10–130.0017%13 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0024%13 Aug →
office11–130.008%13 Aug →
mirage19–17-0.0318%13 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0115%13 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0312%12 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0316%12 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0531%12 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0316%12 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0314%11 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0419%11 Aug →
dust213–50.0225%11 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0821%10 Aug →
nuke13–00.02100%10 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.067%10 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0617%10 Aug →
inferno7–130.0123%9 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0018%9 Aug →
ancient13–100.0022%9 Aug →
inferno13–110.0418%9 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0422%8 Aug →
cache13–40.0419%8 Aug →
inferno8–130.0017%8 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.079%8 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0017%8 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0213%8 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0319%7 Aug →
inferno13–60.1324%7 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.1013%7 Aug →
ancient13–90.0129%7 Aug →
inferno11–130.0420%7 Aug →
dust210–130.0030%7 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0119%2 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0515%2 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0425%2 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0918%30 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0611%30 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0222%30 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0125%29 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0824%27 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0612%27 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0410%24 Jul →
inferno13–40.0033%24 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0514%24 Jul →
office8–13-0.0345%24 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0819%17 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.