PawfessorMeowMeow#1738

PawfessorMeowMeow#1738 — CS2 Stats

76561198974276335[U:1:1014010607]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,737Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,711Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,776Light Blue band · top ~60.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 752 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 8,776 → 8,776
0Faceit ELO · 752 → 752
+2Tracked matches · now 1,737
0.0ppWin rate · 55.2% → 55.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,776 +4,093 25 Jul21 Sept · 25 days played
4,6838,776peak 8,77625 Jul21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 752 +0 29 Aug21 Sept · 4 observations
752752peak 75229 Aug21 Sept
8,776Peak Premier in tracked matches
752Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 752
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 8,776
  • +1,460 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 1,224 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,396), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate50.7%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy1.5%12.2%11.3%9.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.700.980.990.30 short
Match win rate40.1%43.3%43.9%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPawfessorMeowMeow#1738FACEITLevel 3 · 752 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER8,776 · Light Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO752csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning57
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateWWLWTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +75ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 708ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 674ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility3.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.7
Utility3.0
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time633ms−89ms
first ⅓ avg 722ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–2 · debris, 22 Jul
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 7 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 4 Sept
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112957%-0.02
anubisB168850%-0.03
mirageC135838%-0.02
infernoD124833%-0.01
dust2D124833%-0.01
ancientS129375%-0.00
cacheA53260%0.00
vertigo42250%-0.04
debris21150%0.07
boulder1010%-0.03
office1010%-0.05
shelter110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,200Lifetime kills
0.70K/D
2,873Matches
40.1%Match win rate
50.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1.5%Shot accuracy
4,420MVPs
1,704Hours (in match)
3,241Bombs planted
898Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,479
AWP2,453
MAC-101,396
MP91,360
Knife1,216

Lifetime map wins

4,446dust2
4,141inferno
3,636nuke
1,072vertigo
1,062train
127office
5italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,026Matches
48%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
62.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28347%0.6911.0
Inferno17951%0.7311.8
Dust216051%0.7812.0
Ancient11351%0.7212.1
Nuke10442%0.6811.1
Anubis7944%0.6110.0
Train5340%0.589.8
Overpass2357%0.579.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
625msReaction time
47.6%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
4.78HE damage / grenade
2.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.4862 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.7614% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0415%19 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0014%18 Sept
nuke4–8-0.0217%15 Sept
cache13–110.0314%14 Sept
mirage15–150.0421%13 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0219%13 Sept
dust213–90.0719%11 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0411%10 Sept
dust213–00.0721%10 Sept
anubis13–110.0019%10 Sept
inferno8–130.0413%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0116%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0020%8 Sept
nuke13–50.0616%8 Sept
ancient13–70.1021%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0213%8 Sept
dust21–13-0.1010%8 Sept
nuke13–110.0340%7 Sept
anubis8–130.0014%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0818%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0013%4 Sept
anubis10–13-0.035%4 Sept
nuke13–9-0.019%3 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0413%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0220%2 Sept
mirage13–100.0711%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0111%1 Sept
dust27–130.0312%30 Aug
dust213–30.0217%26 Aug
dust216–19-0.048%22 Aug
cache8–13-0.0121%17 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0713%16 Aug
anubis0–13-0.064%16 Aug
nuke13–80.0312%14 Aug
anubis8–130.0518%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0618%12 Aug
anubis14–16-0.058%11 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0422%11 Aug
anubis19–16-0.045%10 Aug
inferno13–100.0220%10 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0417%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0515%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.047%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0514%5 Aug
cache13–110.0213%5 Aug
anubis5–13-0.079%4 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0413%4 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0227%4 Aug
ancient13–6-0.026%4 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0317%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.048%2 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0410%1 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0618%31 Jul
ancient19–160.0313%30 Jul
ancient16–12-0.014%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0618%29 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0323%29 Jul
ancient13–5-0.067%29 Jul
anubis13–5-0.039%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0816%28 Jul
nuke13–100.0012%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0019%27 Jul
dust29–13-0.0115%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0524%27 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0212%27 Jul
inferno13–00.1125%26 Jul
nuke13–70.0411%26 Jul
cache12–16-0.0712%26 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0210%26 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0715%25 Jul
boulder8–13-0.0315%25 Jul
office3–13-0.0525%25 Jul
ancient13–50.048%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0313%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0416%24 Jul
nuke10–13-0.036%23 Jul
debris8–8-0.1215%23 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0817%23 Jul
mirage13–4-0.029%23 Jul
debris9–20.2611%22 Jul
nuke3–9-0.009%22 Jul
vertigo3–3-0.140%22 Jul
nuke8–8-0.044%22 Jul
vertigo9–50.1210%22 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0318%21 Jul
shelter11–00.0127%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0619%19 Jul
nuke13–70.0113%16 Jul
anubis13–1-0.0513%15 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0114%15 Jul
cache13–40.0512%14 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0432%14 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0415%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0621%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0411%13 Jul
inferno16–13-0.047%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.106%12 Jul
nuke13–4-0.016%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0320%10 Jul
nuke13–9-0.056%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →