Subu

Subu — CS2 Stats

FI76561198969232943[U:1:1008967215]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,463Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,301Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,671Blue band · top ~46% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 901 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−262Premier CS Rating · 11,933 → 11,671
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,671 -983 16 Aug20 Sept · 28 days played
11,21614,884peak 14,88416 Aug20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 901 +0 4 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
901901peak 9014 Sept14 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
901Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 901
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 150 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,213 below peak (14,884)
  • -2,622 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,329 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2027−7
Win rate45%33%+12pp
K/D0.690.71−0.02
Headshot %42%50%−8pp

Measured 12 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.1%42.7%43.8%2.7% short
Shot accuracy13.5%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.870.991.020.15 short
Match win rate42.9%43.9%44.7%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSubuFACEITLevel 4 · 901 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,671 · Blue bandPEAK ELO901csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning47
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39601Last 10039%Win rateLLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time618ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 28 Aug
40%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · nuke, 6 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · nuke, 15 Aug
13–3Biggest win · cache, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
137In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 8ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2591636%-0.03
mirageB2091145%-0.04
cacheC1881044%-0.03
ancientD134931%-0.04
nukeC125742%-0.04
anubisB84450%-0.03
dust24040%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

103,162Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
6,025Matches
42.9%Match win rate
41.1%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11,533MVPs
2,720Hours (in match)
9,870Bombs planted
1,333Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,357
AWP12,370
SG 5533,255
FAMAS2,117
MP91,761

Lifetime map wins

23,553inferno
5,671nuke
5,161train
2,794vertigo
2,415dust2
205cbble
137office
109lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,137Matches
49%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
51.6ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno683%0.8210.5
Ancient520%0.6110.2
Nuke425%0.699.0
Mirage333%0.597.7
Dust21100%0.334.0
Anubis10%0.132.0
Train10%0.7112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
91.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
618msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
27.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
11.22HE damage / grenade
8.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7392% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0613%20 Sept
inferno11–130.0321%19 Sept
cache5–13-0.0620%19 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0821%18 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0618%18 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0213%18 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0614%18 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0423%17 Sept
cache13–100.0120%14 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0115%14 Sept
cache10–13-0.0318%13 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0216%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.0611%12 Sept
inferno13–60.0224%12 Sept
cache13–5-0.0718%12 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0839%12 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0115%12 Sept
mirage13–110.0314%12 Sept
mirage13–110.0219%12 Sept
cache8–13-0.036%9 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0223%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0924%8 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0115%8 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0319%8 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0116%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0915%6 Sept
inferno12–160.0320%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.1029%6 Sept
cache13–7-0.0129%6 Sept
cache13–11-0.0032%6 Sept
ancient13–90.0716%5 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0613%5 Sept
cache11–130.0113%5 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0722%5 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0612%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.0330%5 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0414%4 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0511%4 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0421%4 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0516%4 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0717%3 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0522%3 Sept
inferno13–16-0.059%3 Sept
nuke13–9-0.030%3 Sept
cache8–130.0014%3 Sept
inferno10–130.0321%2 Sept
mirage13–90.0121%2 Sept
inferno13–6-0.048%2 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0811%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0121%2 Sept
anubis7–130.0227%2 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0712%2 Sept
cache13–3-0.0412%2 Sept
cache13–10-0.097%1 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0016%31 Aug
cache6–13-0.0418%31 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0821%30 Aug
dust214–16-0.0316%29 Aug
inferno13–60.0615%29 Aug
nuke2–130.0110%28 Aug
anubis13–90.0716%28 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0319%28 Aug
cache4–13-0.0815%27 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0029%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0122%26 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0226%25 Aug
cache7–13-0.0129%23 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0127%22 Aug
cache2–13-0.0233%22 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0413%21 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0237%21 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0811%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.110%20 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0622%20 Aug
ancient13–60.0119%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0412%18 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0614%18 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0519%18 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0917%18 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0417%18 Aug
mirage0–13-0.078%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0228%16 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0419%15 Aug
mirage13–60.0618%15 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0439%15 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0727%15 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0831%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0131%14 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0421%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.075%13 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0632%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1122%11 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1133%6 Aug
cache13–11-0.0338%6 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0940%6 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2420%6 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0334%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0118%27 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1114%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0327%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →