bauno₂ₖ

bauno₂ₖ — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198169754221[U:1:209488493]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,072Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,305Purple band · top ~19.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,879 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,305 -2,969 5 Sept – 11 Oct · 26 days played
16,93020,535peak 20,5355 Sept11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,879 +0 20 Sept – 30 Sept · 2 observations
1,8791,879peak 1,87920 Sept30 Sept
20,977Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,879Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-09-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,879
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 122 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,230 below peak (20,535)
  • -1,343 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,695 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbauno₂ₖFACEITLevel 8 · 1,879 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,305 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,879csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning51
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time515ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 511ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 8 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · overpass, 8 Sept →
320msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · vertigo, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13cacheWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3215–1747%0.01
infernoC145–936%-0.02
ancientA138–562%0.01
dust2A127–558%0.02
cacheD92–722%-0.02
nukeC94–544%0.01
anubisD62–433%0.00
vertigo—31–233%0.05
train—11–0100%0.15
overpass—10–10%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,087Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22752%1.0515.4
Inferno15056%1.1215.6
Ancient12153%1.1316.7
Dust26954%0.9914.3
Anubis4340%0.9315.4
Vertigo4245%0.9815.9
Nuke3759%1.0215.1
Overpass1533%0.9415.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
521msReaction time
59.4%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.78HE damage / grenade
6.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.0493% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–20.030%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.038%8 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0612%7 Oct →
dust210–130.0514%7 Oct →
ancient13–10.0812%7 Oct →
ancient25–22-0.0014%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0415%4 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0425%3 Oct →
mirage2–130.0522%3 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0128%3 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0516%3 Oct →
mirage13–90.0215%2 Oct →
cache13–30.0224%1 Oct →
mirage13–50.0525%1 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0112%1 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.094%1 Oct →
ancient8–130.0418%1 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0319%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0412%30 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.068%29 Sept →
inferno13–110.0620%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.0317%29 Sept →
dust23–11-0.0333%28 Sept →
nuke5–130.1114%28 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0617%28 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0226%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0320%26 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0410%26 Sept →
mirage0–100.0013%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0212%26 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.077%26 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0514%25 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0224%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0211%24 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0310%24 Sept →
nuke9–130.0317%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0319%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0520%23 Sept →
train13–90.1524%21 Sept →
vertigo5–9-0.0520%21 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0118%21 Sept →
cache2–13-0.078%21 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0519%20 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0319%20 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0324%20 Sept →
mirage10–130.0217%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0512%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.1117%19 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0317%19 Sept →
mirage13–110.066%18 Sept →
dust213–70.0111%18 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.063%18 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0311%18 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.028%18 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0515%18 Sept →
inferno13–60.1018%18 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0221%17 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0211%17 Sept →
inferno13–30.0418%17 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0022%16 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0322%16 Sept →
anubis13–50.0723%15 Sept →
mirage13–40.0618%15 Sept →
ancient13–110.0322%15 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0315%13 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0815%13 Sept →
mirage13–10.0218%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.0118%10 Sept →
dust213–50.0724%10 Sept →
mirage16–130.0020%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0725%10 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0116%9 Sept →
ancient16–120.0317%9 Sept →
dust210–130.0823%9 Sept →
inferno8–80.0417%9 Sept →
ancient1–100.024%9 Sept →
cache8–130.0212%9 Sept →
vertigo6–90.017%9 Sept →
overpass6–130.1338%8 Sept →
vertigo9–10.190%8 Sept →
mirage12–160.0022%8 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0118%8 Sept →
mirage11–130.008%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0517%8 Sept →
nuke6–90.0120%7 Sept →
mirage13–100.015%7 Sept →
anubis13–100.0218%7 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0014%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0219%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0313%7 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0116%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.0521%6 Sept →
nuke13–90.0214%6 Sept →
mirage10–130.0513%6 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.066%6 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1314%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0111%6 Sept →
mirage13–20.1419%6 Sept →
ancient13–90.0415%5 Sept →
dust213–20.0730%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.