ValidSalad

ValidSalad — CS2 Stats

VI76561198948874685[U:1:988608957]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,966Tracked matches76%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,874Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,735Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90842 of 261552 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,735 +2,213 6 Jul – 30 Oct · 20 days played
17,52222,392peak 22,3926 Jul30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,552 +0 13 Sept – 24 Sept · 4 observations
1,5521,552peak 1,55213 Sept24 Sept
22,392Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-07-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,657 below peak (22,392)
  • -1,322 over 30 days · declining
  • -853 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 265 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate59.8%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy20.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio3.861.061.07above
Match win rate53.2%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGValidSaladFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,735 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,552csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning74
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–39–8Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWLWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility2.8
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning7.4
Utility2.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time501ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 27 Jul →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · mirage, 16 Oct →
297msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · vertigo, 23 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W5Current streak
3–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 15mirageWeakest map · 43% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3716–2143%0.00
vertigoA3017–1357%0.04
dust2S1511–473%0.02
ancientA85–363%0.01
inferno—42–250%0.04
nuke—32–167%-0.00
anubis—20–20%-0.02
cache—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 37). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

421,025Lifetime kills
3.86K/D · Top 1% of Level 8 players
4,617Matches
53.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players
59.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
20.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
81,057MVPs
2,187Hours (in match)
4,104Bombs planted
2,561Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47152,551
AWP77,751
SSG 0822,445
P2509,313
SG 5537,447
Knife4,479

Lifetime map wins

7,922inferno
7,613dust2
3,191vertigo
3,113nuke
1,201train
117cbble
86ar_shoots
54lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

99Matches
61%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1100%0.8828.0
Ancient10%1.0013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
493msReaction time
66.9%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
0.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 0.9587 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–20.1433%13 Nov →
vertigo13–30.1319%11 Nov →
vertigo7–30.0933%11 Nov →
vertigo13–50.0521%11 Nov →
mirage13–40.0222%11 Nov →
vertigo8–130.0126%8 Nov →
dust213–60.1238%8 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0313%8 Nov →
vertigo13–30.1119%8 Nov →
vertigo12–12-0.0215%6 Nov →
vertigo13–7-0.0315%5 Nov →
vertigo7–130.1431%4 Nov →
vertigo13–90.0410%4 Nov →
vertigo13–20.0917%3 Nov →
vertigo13–80.0518%3 Nov →
vertigo10–130.0816%2 Nov →
vertigo13–20.0111%2 Nov →
vertigo13–100.0215%31 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.0125%31 Oct →
mirage7–40.0041%31 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0931%30 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0033%30 Oct →
dust213–50.0528%30 Oct →
mirage13–110.0018%30 Oct →
mirage11–130.0525%29 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0630%26 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0326%23 Oct →
vertigo2–13-0.0417%23 Oct →
vertigo13–10.0617%23 Oct →
mirage7–00.0319%23 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0015%18 Oct →
vertigo3–130.0335%18 Oct →
vertigo3–13-0.0217%18 Oct →
vertigo11–130.0422%18 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0767%16 Oct →
anubis9–130.0419%16 Oct →
vertigo8–130.0324%16 Oct →
mirage12–120.0327%16 Oct →
mirage11–130.0534%15 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0925%15 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0016%10 Oct →
vertigo4–130.0841%10 Oct →
vertigo10–130.0318%10 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0120%7 Oct →
mirage9–130.0314%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0819%7 Oct →
dust211–130.0323%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0716%4 Oct →
mirage12–120.0322%27 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0119%25 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0414%24 Sept →
mirage13–90.0231%22 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0219%16 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0814%16 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0235%15 Sept →
mirage8–130.0128%15 Sept →
mirage0–4-0.0450%15 Sept →
mirage6–00.1347%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0526%13 Sept →
vertigo4–1-0.0233%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0222%13 Sept →
mirage8–130.0528%9 Sept →
ancient13–90.0217%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.1037%6 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0222%4 Sept →
ancient13–100.0020%3 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0125%3 Sept →
dust213–90.0129%2 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0124%2 Sept →
dust27–10.0232%1 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0217%1 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0126%30 Aug →
dust213–70.0220%29 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0120%23 Aug →
dust213–100.0339%22 Aug →
mirage15–150.0114%22 Aug →
ancient5–130.0115%16 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0033%16 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0136%2 Aug →
dust213–80.0118%1 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0113%1 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0213%27 Jul →
inferno13–10.1529%27 Jul →
ancient13–60.0319%27 Jul →
nuke13–40.0121%25 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0332%25 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0523%22 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0224%22 Jul →
inferno16–130.0428%22 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0529%17 Jul →
ancient10–130.0320%17 Jul →
mirage11–130.0117%12 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0430%12 Jul →
dust213–110.0526%12 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0441%12 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0040%9 Jul →
ancient13–70.0523%6 Jul →
dust213–100.0931%5 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0026%5 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0126%4 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.