Zereliq

Zereliq — CS2 Stats

76561198882934453[U:1:922668725]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,151Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,096Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22027 of 260004 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +5,786 30 Jul – 29 Oct · 24 days played
19,21425,286peak 25,28630 Jul29 Oct
25,286Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-07-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 286 below peak (25,286)
  • +2,854 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,786 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.5%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy11.1%13.0%13.2%2.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.061.07above
Match win rate50.3%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZereliqFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning51
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateLLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time516ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–1 · rush_001, 24 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · eldorado, 3 Aug →
313msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · rush_001, 4 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 91% over 11infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011–955%0.02
dust2B178–947%-0.02
nukeB158–753%0.01
cacheS1110–191%0.01
ancientA116–555%-0.02
rush_001B105–550%0.03
anubisA85–363%0.00
infernoC52–340%-0.03
eldorado—21–150%-0.04
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,093Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
4,026Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
48.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11.1%Shot accuracy
12,343MVPs
2,129Hours (in match)
4,941Bombs planted
1,130Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,221
AWP6,611
MP92,310
SSG 081,798
FAMAS1,540

Lifetime map wins

5,598inferno
3,869dust2
2,972nuke
2,308train
2,236vertigo
358cbble
266lake
228office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

830Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
76.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5260%1.0614.6
Ancient4255%0.9614.2
Anubis2756%0.9514.6
Dust22241%0.9213.7
Cache1872%1.1015.4
Inferno1338%0.8712.8
Nuke1118%0.7513.1
Overpass1050%0.9914.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
507msReaction time
42.4%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
8.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–160.0120%29 Oct →
rush_0016–80.1210%24 Oct →
rush_0018–60.1022%24 Oct →
rush_0010–4-0.148%24 Oct →
rush_0015–10.1636%24 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.0117%24 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0227%24 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0525%24 Oct →
anubis13–40.1212%23 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0514%23 Oct →
mirage13–40.1221%22 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0316%22 Oct →
nuke10–130.0510%22 Oct →
dust213–40.0414%22 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0112%21 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0121%21 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0419%21 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0322%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0410%20 Oct →
nuke10–130.0132%18 Oct →
mirage16–140.0518%16 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0420%16 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0613%16 Oct →
dust213–110.0026%13 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1010%13 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0319%11 Oct →
cache10–130.0220%11 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0213%11 Oct →
dust213–60.0219%11 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0721%11 Oct →
cache16–14-0.048%9 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0116%9 Oct →
cache13–90.0110%9 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0221%9 Oct →
mirage8–130.037%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0010%9 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0215%9 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.008%9 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0515%9 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0316%9 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0317%8 Oct →
cache13–20.0723%8 Oct →
mirage15–150.0823%7 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0914%7 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0312%5 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.2111%4 Oct →
rush_0011–50.0533%4 Oct →
rush_0018–60.0320%4 Oct →
rush_0018–70.0733%4 Oct →
rush_0014–00.1333%4 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0520%1 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0319%29 Sept →
nuke13–90.0420%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0117%27 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0420%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0327%18 Sept →
mirage6–130.0418%12 Sept →
mirage13–80.0211%11 Sept →
dust216–120.0421%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0114%29 Aug →
nuke13–40.0616%28 Aug →
nuke1–8-0.1014%25 Aug →
cache16–140.1217%24 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0210%24 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.066%21 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0022%20 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0215%20 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0016%20 Aug →
mirage12–120.0610%20 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0610%20 Aug →
nuke13–100.0319%20 Aug →
cache13–2-0.0231%20 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0417%20 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0616%19 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0224%19 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0321%19 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0011%18 Aug →
anubis13–90.0417%18 Aug →
cache13–100.0117%18 Aug →
dust213–90.0116%17 Aug →
inferno13–60.0027%17 Aug →
mirage13–100.0317%16 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0317%16 Aug →
ancient13–80.0515%13 Aug →
mirage13–50.0411%10 Aug →
nuke13–80.0938%10 Aug →
overpass2–9-0.0210%10 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.019%9 Aug →
nuke13–50.0619%9 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0510%9 Aug →
mirage16–120.0328%9 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.036%9 Aug →
mirage13–80.0214%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0314%8 Aug →
anubis13–40.0412%8 Aug →
mirage15–150.0316%5 Aug →
eldorado5–9-0.1250%3 Aug →
eldorado9–10.0311%2 Aug →
nuke13–70.0315%1 Aug →
cache13–90.0217%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.