Ecomm

Ecomm — CS2 Stats

US76561198881064243[U:1:920798515]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,481Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,585Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,136Blue band · top ~43.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10761 of 15206 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEcommFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,136 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning42
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5347Last 10053%Win rateWWWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression4.6
Utility5.9
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time623ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–10
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1911858%0.00
cacheB189950%0.01
ancientB179853%0.02
dust2C1771041%0.01
nukeA149564%0.02
infernoA95456%0.00
anubisB63350%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,686Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
2,068Matches
42.1%Match win rate
57.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
4.8%Shot accuracy
4,109MVPs
743Hours (in match)
1,388Bombs planted
507Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,185dust2
1,567nuke
1,231inferno
1,133vertigo
411train
16cbble
3office
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
46%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
87.1ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24347%0.9515.5
Mirage4045%1.0916.9
Ancient2854%1.1016.3
Inferno1030%0.9915.2
Anubis956%1.0818.7
Nuke812%0.9617.5
Cache367%1.1516.7
Vertigo2100%1.9424.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
621msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
9.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4059% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0525%16 Aug
dust213–40.1125%16 Aug
dust213–110.0917%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0326%16 Aug
dust213–16-0.0017%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0222%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0316%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0416%1 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0112%1 Aug
cache1–8-0.010%1 Aug
cache13–50.1325%31 Jul
cache8–130.0328%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0113%31 Jul
ancient13–50.0414%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0214%30 Jul
mirage16–130.0721%27 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0123%27 Jul
nuke13–50.0430%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0314%27 Jul
cache13–10.0418%27 Jul
ancient13–60.0918%27 Jul
inferno13–50.1132%26 Jul
mirage0–3-0.030%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0121%26 Jul
cache16–14-0.0916%26 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0916%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.0613%25 Jul
cache12–16-0.0114%25 Jul
dust210–13-0.0311%24 Jul
inferno2–9-0.2225%24 Jul
dust23–13-0.0724%21 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0226%21 Jul
cache13–20.0111%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0517%21 Jul
cache6–13-0.0618%21 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0211%21 Jul
cache6–13-0.0321%21 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0413%21 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0519%20 Jul
dust29–13-0.0116%20 Jul
nuke2–120.0311%20 Jul
dust213–70.0523%20 Jul
anubis13–100.1327%19 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0413%19 Jul
cache16–140.0424%19 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%17 Jul
ancient13–50.0918%17 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0715%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0215%16 Jul
dust26–00.1118%16 Jul
anubis2–9-0.0727%16 Jul
cache10–130.0622%16 Jul
ancient16–130.0314%15 Jul
mirage13–70.017%15 Jul
cache13–90.0119%14 Jul
cache5–13-0.0414%13 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0220%13 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0125%13 Jul
ancient14–160.0216%12 Jul
nuke13–100.1513%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0114%12 Jul
anubis13–30.0818%12 Jul
nuke13–90.0729%12 Jul
cache16–120.0728%12 Jul
inferno7–130.0418%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0214%11 Jul
nuke0–4-0.06100%11 Jul
anubis11–130.0414%11 Jul
ancient13–110.0122%10 Jul
cache13–60.0326%9 Jul
cache13–50.0422%9 Jul
ancient7–13-0.057%5 Jul
mirage6–130.0119%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0621%4 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0327%4 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0320%4 Jul
dust216–140.0220%4 Jul
mirage13–30.0714%3 Jul
ancient6–130.0921%3 Jul
dust24–13-0.0514%3 Jul
nuke13–110.0418%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0226%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0117%2 Jul
mirage13–60.0715%30 Jun
mirage13–100.0124%28 Jun
mirage13–60.0613%28 Jun
dust213–160.0019%28 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0420%28 Jun
ancient16–130.0421%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0613%27 Jun
inferno13–50.1217%27 Jun
inferno9–130.0517%26 Jun
mirage11–130.0523%25 Jun
nuke13–70.1215%25 Jun
dust213–20.1425%22 Jun
dust27–13-0.0120%21 Jun
nuke13–30.0510%21 Jun
dust29–13-0.048%21 Jun
dust213–3-0.0023%20 Jun
nuke13–100.0211%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →