Stonie

Stonie — CS2 Stats

76561199090771461[U:1:1130505733]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

473Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
317Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,955Blue band · top ~44.5% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,955 +671 28 Apr – 26 Sept · 33 days played
9,44113,122peak 13,12228 Apr26 Sept
13,485Peak Premier in tracked matches
865Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-04-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,167 below peak (13,122)
  • +103 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,045 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate42.2%42.0%44.4%2.2% short
Shot accuracy2.7%9.6%11.9%9.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.830.981.030.20 short
Match win rate41.3%43.8%45.2%3.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStoniePREMIER11,955 · Blue bandPEAK ELO865csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning54
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time602ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 18 Jun →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · mirage, 27 May →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 16 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 12 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2413–1154%-0.01
ancientA2012–860%-0.00
dust2A1811–761%-0.01
overpassB126–650%-0.01
nukeS107–370%-0.00
anubisD61–517%-0.03
cacheD61–517%-0.01
inferno—44–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,029Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
784Matches
41.3%Match win rate
42.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
2.7%Shot accuracy
1,230MVPs
317Hours (in match)
976Bombs planted
143Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,529dust2
735nuke
218inferno
152vertigo
137train
26cbble
7safehouse
6lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
44%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
67.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%0.8111.7
Dust21145%0.8210.3
Ancient944%2.3214.9
Anubis333%0.487.3
Nuke30%0.7012.0
Inferno20%0.488.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
585msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9716% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.0207% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–130.0413%26 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0510%20 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0720%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0113%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0412%5 Sept →
ancient16–130.0119%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0116%5 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0114%29 Aug →
mirage13–30.016%29 Aug →
dust213–50.0725%29 Aug →
inferno13–30.069%29 Aug →
cache13–110.035%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0421%16 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.009%13 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0113%31 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0216%31 Jul →
ancient13–50.0216%30 Jul →
nuke9–130.0214%21 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0410%21 Jul →
ancient14–160.0218%12 Jul →
ancient7–130.0112%5 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0613%4 Jul →
mirage13–30.0319%3 Jul →
mirage13–110.0216%2 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0225%2 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0511%27 Jun →
inferno13–50.0112%27 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.092%21 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0611%21 Jun →
nuke13–3-0.0611%21 Jun →
dust213–30.0410%20 Jun →
overpass13–100.0315%20 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0326%20 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0311%20 Jun →
ancient13–90.0413%20 Jun →
dust213–110.0211%20 Jun →
ancient16–13-0.048%18 Jun →
dust211–13-0.046%18 Jun →
mirage13–70.1412%18 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0621%18 Jun →
dust215–15-0.026%14 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0511%13 Jun →
dust213–3-0.045%13 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0614%13 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.019%12 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0416%12 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0612%12 Jun →
ancient13–60.0415%12 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.075%11 Jun →
overpass13–90.0114%10 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0215%9 Jun →
overpass10–130.1021%8 Jun →
ancient13–70.0610%7 Jun →
nuke13–50.026%7 Jun →
dust210–130.0017%7 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0711%7 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0617%7 Jun →
mirage16–130.0011%6 Jun →
mirage13–110.0412%6 Jun →
nuke13–110.0417%5 Jun →
anubis11–130.029%5 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0212%3 Jun →
nuke13–50.1011%3 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0021%3 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0314%31 May →
mirage14–160.015%29 May →
ancient13–30.089%29 May →
mirage9–13-0.0420%29 May →
dust213–11-0.0312%28 May →
mirage8–130.0221%28 May →
overpass13–50.036%28 May →
mirage13–11-0.0030%27 May →
ancient13–70.0916%27 May →
mirage13–10-0.0328%27 May →
mirage10–13-0.0320%26 May →
inferno13–9-0.0826%23 May →
dust28–13-0.0018%23 May →
anubis9–13-0.0712%23 May →
overpass13–4-0.0119%23 May →
overpass13–40.009%22 May →
dust213–100.0317%22 May →
mirage4–13-0.0821%22 May →
ancient6–13-0.059%21 May →
anubis2–13-0.0811%19 May →
overpass9–13-0.018%18 May →
dust213–50.0311%18 May →
ancient4–13-0.0812%16 May →
ancient13–9-0.018%16 May →
ancient4–13-0.034%12 May →
overpass8–13-0.105%12 May →
nuke6–13-0.0216%11 May →
nuke13–90.025%11 May →
cache8–13-0.0311%9 May →
dust213–4-0.0013%5 May →
mirage9–13-0.0324%4 May →
mirage0–13-0.0812%2 May →
cache4–13-0.0217%1 May →
mirage13–9-0.019%28 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.059%28 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0112%28 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.