LakkisPekkis — CS2 Stats

FI76561198875899534[U:1:915633806]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

601Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,630Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating16,454Purple band · top ~22.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31411 of 57342 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,587), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	30.3%	43.7%	44.7%	14.4% short
Shot accuracy	13.7%	11.8%	12.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.83	1.02	1.04	0.21 short
Match win rate	40.8%	45.0%	45.2%	4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning52

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.0

Aggression4.7

Utility6.2

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch8.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning5.2

Utility6.2

Mechanics4.6

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time504ms−77ms

first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms

Headshot accuracy11.2%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 12.4% → last ⅓ avg 11.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	31	12–19	39%	-0.02
inferno	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
nuke	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.02
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.03
vertigo	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
cache	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
anubis	D	6	0–6	0%	0.01
dust2	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
office	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,853Lifetime kills

0.83K/D

2,712Matches

40.8%Match win rate

30.3%Headshot %

13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

5,242MVPs

893Hours (in match)

1,810Bombs planted

757Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,293

M4A4 / M4A1-S6,088

AWP4,460

P2000 / USP-S2,250

Glock-181,690

Desert Eagle1,427

MAC-101,375

MP91,051

FAMAS904

MP7787

Lifetime map wins

4,391inferno

2,741nuke

2,431vertigo

1,245dust2

936train

642cbble

217lake

197office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches

49%Win rate

0.91Avg K/D

79.0ADR

30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win

9%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	10	60%	0.72	10.9
Inferno	7	71%	1.43	17.0
Ancient	5	60%	0.95	12.8
Nuke	5	40%	0.98	16.4
Dust2	5	40%	1.02	16.0
Anubis	2	0%	0.89	13.0
Overpass	1	100%	0.88	15.0
Cache	1	100%	1.62	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy

37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

70.5%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

511msReaction time

27.8%T opening success

45.1%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

10.41HE damage / grenade

6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 10.9984% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.8326% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–13	-0.06	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	9%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	0%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	16%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	11%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.14	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.11	13%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	7%	26 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	14%	24 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	11%	24 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.07	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	7%	23 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.03	2%	23 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	5%	23 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.01	20%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	8%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	9%	23 Aug →
vertigo	9–7	-0.02	6%	23 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.07	23%	21 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.08	18%	21 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	4%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	8%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	10%	20 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	11%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	1%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	15%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	7%	19 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	14%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	8%	18 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.03	8%	18 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	0.01	9%	18 Aug →
vertigo	9–4	-0.08	13%	18 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.11	31%	18 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	15%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	10%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	5%	16 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	7%	14 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.06	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	14%	14 Aug →
vertigo	1–9	-0.07	5%	14 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.18	14%	14 Aug →
overpass	9–3	0.02	12%	14 Aug →
vertigo	6–9	-0.05	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	12%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	11%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	5%	11 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.11	10%	11 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	8%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.04	12%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	10%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	26%	10 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	10%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	10%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	9%	10 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	14%	9 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.05	10%	9 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	13%	9 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	13%	9 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.12	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	20%	9 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.09	20%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	19%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.04	16%	8 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	20%	7 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	5%	7 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	21%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	17%	7 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.02	6%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	9%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	11%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	17%	7 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	9%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.00	11%	7 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	10%	6 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.02	9%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
ancient	1–11	-0.08	5%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	9%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	3%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	7%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	21%	4 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.03	14%	4 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	-0.08	6%	3 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	0.00	9%	3 Aug →
office	12–4	-0.01	15%	3 Aug →