PRNS

PRNS — CS2 Stats

76561198873037333[U:1:912771605]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,505Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
941Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,051Blue band · top ~33.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,005 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (37 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,051 +1,565 11 Jun – 8 Oct · 34 days played
11,07614,051peak 14,05111 Jun8 Oct
14,315Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,005Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,005
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,051
  • +2,975 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 949 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate50.3%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy8.2%12.0%12.4%4.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.03above
Match win rate39.5%44.7%45.2%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPRNSFACEITLevel 5 · 1,005 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,051 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,005csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning68
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility4.6
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 679ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning6.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time678ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 3 Jul →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 15 Aug →
484msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · anubis, 12 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3619–1753%0.00
mirageC2812–1643%-0.01
infernoB105–550%0.00
cacheS76–186%0.00
ancientC73–443%-0.00
nukeB63–350%0.03
anubisC52–340%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,778Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,405Matches
39.5%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
4,108MVPs
941Hours (in match)
1,933Bombs planted
452Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,662dust2
3,555inferno
808nuke
579vertigo
294train
91cbble
76office
36lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

102Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
68.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3155%0.9612.4
Dust22744%1.0914.4
Inferno1650%1.0114.7
Ancient862%0.9612.8
Anubis862%1.2015.4
Overpass450%0.549.3
Nuke425%0.9013.0
Cache3100%1.0212.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
679msReaction time
48.5%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.73HE damage / grenade
13.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4585 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–160.0419%8 Oct →
nuke13–10.1021%8 Oct →
inferno13–80.0330%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0131%1 Oct →
cache13–90.0419%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0416%30 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0210%30 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.062%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0513%22 Sept →
mirage13–40.0317%22 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0513%21 Sept →
dust213–30.1018%21 Sept →
dust216–120.0628%20 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0427%25 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0525%25 Aug →
dust26–130.0218%19 Aug →
nuke13–110.0222%19 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0719%18 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0514%15 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0346%15 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0315%15 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.1013%13 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0129%13 Aug →
cache13–50.0027%13 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0222%12 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0229%12 Aug →
inferno13–10.0526%12 Aug →
cache13–100.0220%11 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.045%11 Aug →
dust213–60.0224%5 Aug →
mirage13–90.0415%5 Aug →
anubis13–50.0432%2 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0124%1 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0428%29 Jul →
mirage13–40.1017%29 Jul →
dust216–130.0221%26 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0120%26 Jul →
dust213–60.0318%24 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0211%23 Jul →
mirage16–140.0129%20 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0527%20 Jul →
dust213–70.0321%20 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0218%20 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0330%20 Jul →
mirage13–70.0114%19 Jul →
cache13–110.0426%18 Jul →
mirage8–130.0228%18 Jul →
mirage11–130.0625%17 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0531%15 Jul →
inferno13–110.0412%15 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0318%13 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0420%12 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0617%12 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0525%12 Jul →
dust213–90.0419%11 Jul →
ancient6–130.0019%11 Jul →
dust213–100.0416%10 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0234%10 Jul →
dust28–130.0419%9 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0117%9 Jul →
mirage13–70.0416%9 Jul →
dust216–120.0030%9 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0322%6 Jul →
dust213–50.0123%6 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0123%4 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0315%4 Jul →
dust213–80.1119%3 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0315%2 Jul →
dust210–130.0322%1 Jul →
nuke10–130.0112%1 Jul →
overpass13–60.1029%1 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0322%1 Jul →
inferno13–60.0416%1 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0717%30 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0611%30 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0711%30 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0311%29 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0521%27 Jun →
dust27–130.0324%27 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0213%27 Jun →
mirage13–60.0010%26 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0820%24 Jun →
nuke13–10.0419%23 Jun →
ancient14–160.0313%20 Jun →
ancient13–110.0412%20 Jun →
dust213–80.0322%20 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0121%19 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0020%18 Jun →
mirage0–13-0.0710%17 Jun →
ancient13–60.0915%17 Jun →
cache13–80.0424%17 Jun →
mirage13–40.0722%17 Jun →
mirage7–130.0333%16 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0024%16 Jun →
mirage13–50.0215%16 Jun →
nuke7–130.0423%14 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0217%12 Jun →
dust210–130.027%12 Jun →
dust213–80.0118%12 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0414%11 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.