:) — CS2 Stats

76561198870345482[U:1:910079754]✓ No bans

955Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,947Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating14,341Blue band · top ~31.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16108 of 24614 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate35.7%41.7%44.1%8.4% short
Shot accuracy11.5%8.8%11.4%meets
Kill/death ratio0.750.971.030.28 short
Match win rate38.7%43.8%45.2%6.4% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG:)PREMIER14,341 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning41
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50446Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression3.2
Utility5.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.1
Utility5.1
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time627ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–9
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
145In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB54272750%-0.02
dust2A149564%-0.02
mirageA116555%-0.01
vertigoB63350%-0.03
anubisC52340%-0.00
inferno41325%-0.05
cache42250%-0.00
ancient2020%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,845Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
3,371Matches
38.7%Match win rate
35.7%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
4,258MVPs
1,103Hours (in match)
1,871Bombs planted
479Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,049
AWP4,689
MP91,551
FAMAS1,201
MAC-101,043

Lifetime map wins

11,170nuke
5,157vertigo
2,331inferno
1,922dust2
465train
428lake
151office
40ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
624msReaction time
19.2%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
7.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4316% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.238% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–16-0.0119%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0515%27 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0414%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0512%26 Aug
mirage16–130.009%26 Aug
nuke13–160.0211%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0228%18 Aug
dust213–110.037%17 Aug
mirage13–4-0.019%17 Aug
cache13–110.018%17 Aug
dust27–13-0.113%15 Aug
mirage8–130.019%15 Aug
nuke14–160.026%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.025%12 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0012%12 Aug
cache13–4-0.005%12 Aug
dust213–10.0115%12 Aug
nuke9–130.0716%6 Aug
nuke13–20.0310%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0119%5 Aug
cache7–13-0.0310%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0410%5 Aug
anubis13–60.0112%5 Aug
nuke5–130.018%5 Aug
mirage14–160.0313%2 Aug
dust216–12-0.0122%2 Aug
dust213–11-0.0316%2 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0117%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.1422%31 Jul
anubis7–13-0.057%31 Jul
cache7–130.0110%30 Jul
dust214–16-0.0118%30 Jul
nuke10–13-0.078%30 Jul
dust213–50.0912%29 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0317%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0710%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.1214%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0312%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.038%27 Jul
ancient8–130.0216%26 Jul
anubis13–90.1311%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0123%25 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0612%25 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0516%25 Jul
nuke13–50.0218%25 Jul
dust213–5-0.037%25 Jul
anubis6–13-0.065%25 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0413%24 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0210%24 Jul
inferno9–13-0.1611%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.018%22 Jul
dust213–4-0.0214%22 Jul
dust213–80.0314%20 Jul
vertigo3–130.0013%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.059%19 Jul
nuke13–10.1012%19 Jul
nuke13–50.0118%18 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0413%18 Jul
nuke13–110.038%18 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0210%17 Jul
nuke13–11-0.054%17 Jul
nuke0–2-0.080%17 Jul
nuke12–120.1019%16 Jul
nuke13–10.0014%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.028%16 Jul
nuke12–120.0413%15 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0011%15 Jul
nuke3–13-0.078%13 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0511%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0710%10 Jul
nuke13–110.012%9 Jul
nuke13–50.037%9 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0412%9 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0012%6 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0119%6 Jul
nuke9–13-0.053%5 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0515%4 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0611%2 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0121%2 Jul
nuke9–13-0.099%2 Jul
nuke11–130.0014%29 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0411%29 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0512%27 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0516%27 Jun
nuke5–30.046%27 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0228%27 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0314%27 Jun
vertigo13–100.0512%21 Jun
nuke12–120.0015%21 Jun
nuke0–6-0.060%21 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.0624%20 Jun
nuke12–120.0312%20 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0412%20 Jun
vertigo13–5-0.0416%11 Jun
nuke8–13-0.076%11 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0215%7 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0213%7 Jun
nuke13–10-0.037%7 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.090%4 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0415%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →