Iso Jiki

Iso Jiki — CS2 Stats

76561198859506713[U:1:899240985]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,596Tracked matches69%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,007Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82463 of 251938 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 927 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +4,000 18 Aug – 14 Oct · 37 days played
15,99922,186peak 22,18618 Aug14 Oct
22,287Peak Premier in tracked matches
927Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 927
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,187 below peak (22,186)
  • -2,187 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.9%42.7%43.7%4.9% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.3%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.840.991.020.18 short
Match win rate49.7%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIso JikiFACEITLevel 4 · 927 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO927csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning53
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–38–6Last 10056%Win rateWTWLWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time520ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 508ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 30 Aug →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · vertigo, 2 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 15 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12vertigoWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB199–1047%-0.01
nukeA159–660%-0.02
dust2B137–654%-0.03
cacheA138–562%-0.02
infernoS128–467%-0.00
ancientA117–464%-0.01
anubisB105–550%0.01
vertigoC73–443%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,267Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,608Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
38.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,449MVPs
1,113Hours (in match)
3,692Bombs planted
689Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,631nuke
4,212inferno
2,903dust2
2,317vertigo
401train
395office
51italy
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

110Matches
50%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
68.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3847%0.8311.1
Inferno1947%0.8211.2
Nuke1464%0.8913.3
Ancient1443%0.8713.2
Dust21258%0.8212.5
Anubis540%0.799.8
Vertigo560%0.9113.6
Cache250%0.8211.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
67.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
515msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
6.85HE damage / grenade
14.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.229% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–70.0414%14 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0412%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0119%14 Oct →
anubis10–130.0413%13 Oct →
mirage13–20.0320%13 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.047%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0114%13 Oct →
mirage13–40.0116%12 Oct →
anubis15–150.037%12 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0919%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0124%12 Oct →
anubis13–40.0521%12 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0321%11 Oct →
dust23–13-0.058%11 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0714%11 Oct →
inferno13–110.0515%11 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0013%11 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0424%9 Oct →
anubis13–40.0613%9 Oct →
anubis13–40.037%5 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0316%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0718%4 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0011%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0418%4 Oct →
dust213–70.0014%2 Oct →
nuke13–100.0122%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.0221%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.035%2 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0237%2 Oct →
vertigo13–6-0.0344%2 Oct →
anubis0–8-0.0128%2 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
cache13–100.0318%30 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0132%30 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0215%30 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0830%29 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0815%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0417%27 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0215%27 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0612%26 Sept →
mirage4–12-0.037%26 Sept →
inferno13–100.0013%25 Sept →
anubis13–20.0228%25 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0618%25 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0011%24 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0421%24 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0318%23 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0820%23 Sept →
ancient13–50.0830%23 Sept →
mirage10–130.0428%19 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0316%18 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0320%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0915%16 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0826%16 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0511%16 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0415%15 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0729%15 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0716%15 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0326%14 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0120%9 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0121%9 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0910%6 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0911%6 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0018%6 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0226%5 Sept →
cache13–100.0320%5 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0316%5 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0311%4 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0019%3 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0614%2 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0413%2 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0714%31 Aug →
ancient13–80.0212%31 Aug →
nuke15–150.008%30 Aug →
cache13–40.0311%30 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0611%30 Aug →
nuke13–90.0916%30 Aug →
ancient13–80.0115%29 Aug →
inferno13–60.0215%29 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0510%29 Aug →
mirage13–70.027%29 Aug →
cache13–110.0416%29 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0311%29 Aug →
mirage13–100.0414%28 Aug →
dust213–1-0.0125%28 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0114%28 Aug →
mirage13–40.0223%27 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0315%27 Aug →
ancient13–60.0522%27 Aug →
inferno13–80.0624%27 Aug →
cache13–4-0.015%26 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0426%26 Aug →
mirage15–150.0113%24 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0315%23 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0714%19 Aug →
anubis16–12-0.0113%19 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0221%19 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0318%19 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0215%19 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0226%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.