maybe se o sefu

maybe se o sefu — CS2 Stats

76561198080531858[U:1:120266130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,021Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,288Purple band · top ~15.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,169 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,288 -3,277 1 Sept – 14 Oct · 31 days played
16,81121,834peak 21,8341 Sept14 Oct
21,927Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,169Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,169
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 331 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,546 below peak (21,834)
  • -3,546 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,712 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmaybe se o sefuFACEITLevel 9 · 2,169 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,288 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,169csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning60
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–50–7Last 10043%Win rateWTWLWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time575ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy30.7%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 30.2% → last ⅓ avg 30.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 12–12 · dust2, 25 Sept →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 25 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · cache, 11 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 23dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2312–1152%0.05
dust2D155–1033%0.02
anubisC135–838%0.04
cacheB136–746%0.04
ancientC114–736%-0.01
nukeB105–550%0.03
infernoC94–544%0.03
vertigoD62–433%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

955Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
76.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19952%1.1115.2
Ancient7553%1.0516.8
Inferno6757%1.1315.9
Vertigo5852%1.1917.1
Nuke5161%1.2517.8
Anubis4248%1.0714.7
Dust23453%0.9714.6
Overpass1747%1.0816.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
561msReaction time
50.7%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
7.48HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–70.0428%14 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0239%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0628%14 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0512%13 Oct →
mirage13–20.0216%13 Oct →
ancient13–110.0121%13 Oct →
nuke13–110.0637%13 Oct →
mirage13–40.1218%12 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0027%12 Oct →
dust25–130.0427%12 Oct →
dust211–130.0142%12 Oct →
anubis13–40.0726%12 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0815%11 Oct →
dust23–130.0232%11 Oct →
cache13–90.0327%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0244%11 Oct →
anubis11–130.0319%11 Oct →
vertigo11–130.0523%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.0725%9 Oct →
anubis13–40.0256%9 Oct →
anubis13–50.1043%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0056%9 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0227%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.0932%8 Oct →
cache14–160.1241%8 Oct →
mirage11–130.0827%7 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0045%4 Oct →
mirage15–150.0326%4 Oct →
cache10–130.0123%4 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0436%4 Oct →
mirage4–130.0333%2 Oct →
nuke13–20.2030%2 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0232%1 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0517%30 Sept →
mirage13–30.1025%30 Sept →
ancient13–160.0222%30 Sept →
cache11–130.1816%29 Sept →
inferno3–130.0137%27 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0336%27 Sept →
nuke13–60.0857%27 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0048%26 Sept →
mirage4–12-0.0524%26 Sept →
cache13–100.0212%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0733%25 Sept →
anubis11–130.0642%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0850%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.1762%25 Sept →
mirage8–30.1938%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0226%25 Sept →
anubis13–20.1321%25 Sept →
dust212–120.2033%25 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0925%25 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0341%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0229%19 Sept →
nuke7–130.0138%18 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0130%18 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0713%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.0633%18 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0148%17 Sept →
nuke6–130.0140%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0313%16 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0135%16 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0033%15 Sept →
mirage7–130.0222%15 Sept →
anubis10–130.0218%15 Sept →
cache13–60.0920%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0935%14 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0124%14 Sept →
cache15–150.0223%13 Sept →
ancient13–30.0518%13 Sept →
inferno15–150.0833%13 Sept →
dust26–130.0241%12 Sept →
ancient13–70.0929%12 Sept →
dust213–70.1736%12 Sept →
anubis6–130.0133%12 Sept →
ancient8–130.0033%11 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0326%11 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0225%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0216%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0021%9 Sept →
mirage13–30.0620%9 Sept →
inferno9–130.0739%7 Sept →
mirage5–130.0248%6 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0814%6 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.1033%6 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0645%6 Sept →
cache12–120.0841%5 Sept →
mirage9–130.1031%5 Sept →
cache13–100.0553%5 Sept →
mirage13–90.0232%5 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0227%3 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0429%3 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0719%3 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0431%2 Sept →
anubis8–130.1035%2 Sept →
mirage9–130.0436%2 Sept →
mirage13–100.0627%2 Sept →
ancient8–130.0412%1 Sept →
anubis13–80.0222%1 Sept →
mirage13–80.0145%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.