DickerDuebel

DickerDuebel — CS2 Stats

76561198821488553[U:1:861222825]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,481Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,660Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,635Top 25% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34378 of 247967 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+359Premier CS Rating · 23,276 → 23,635

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,635 -3,024 29 Mar – 2 Oct · 19 days played
23,27627,077peak 27,07729 Mar2 Oct
27,286Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-03-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,442 below peak (27,077)
  • -786 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,365 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,336), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.5%48.2%50.9%2.5% short
Shot accuracy13.4%13.3%13.8%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.071.09above
Match win rate48.3%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDickerDuebelFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,635 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning67
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateWLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time500ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 5 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 16 Aug →
297msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 8 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD237–1630%0.03
infernoB199–1047%0.01
dust2A159–660%0.00
anubisD142–1214%0.01
nukeB105–550%0.05
mirageC94–544%0.01
cacheA74–357%0.04
overpass—33–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,394Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,403Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
48.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13,611MVPs
1,169Hours (in match)
3,508Bombs planted
838Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,548
AWP9,123
MP92,298
MAC-101,760
FAMAS1,462

Lifetime map wins

5,995inferno
3,681dust2
2,545vertigo
1,553nuke
1,471cbble
740lake
665train
25safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

594Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis11160%1.0715.7
Ancient8249%1.0015.4
Mirage7850%0.9714.2
Inferno6152%1.0716.1
Dust21540%0.9314.9
Train1567%1.0214.6
Nuke978%1.3320.4
Vertigo650%1.1516.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
489msReaction time
59.3%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.71HE damage / grenade
3.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.491 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–140.0113%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0216%14 Sept →
anubis7–130.2024%14 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0513%13 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0021%13 Sept →
inferno16–120.0523%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0416%12 Sept →
ancient10–130.0523%12 Sept →
ancient9–130.0815%12 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0114%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0617%12 Sept →
anubis14–160.0212%12 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0613%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0820%12 Sept →
ancient8–130.0120%12 Sept →
inferno7–130.1318%10 Sept →
dust20–40.0214%10 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0522%9 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0121%9 Sept →
ancient11–130.0412%9 Sept →
inferno13–40.0318%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0329%9 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0025%9 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0426%9 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0623%8 Sept →
dust216–140.0512%8 Sept →
cache13–110.0625%8 Sept →
anubis13–90.009%8 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0716%8 Sept →
ancient8–130.0819%8 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0514%8 Sept →
nuke10–130.0219%7 Sept →
cache7–130.0315%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0713%7 Sept →
nuke10–130.0522%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0127%6 Sept →
anubis13–160.0332%6 Sept →
cache13–50.0416%6 Sept →
nuke9–20.1528%6 Sept →
ancient4–130.0225%6 Sept →
dust215–150.0215%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.0023%6 Sept →
cache3–130.0421%5 Sept →
inferno16–130.1021%5 Sept →
nuke13–160.0313%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.2420%5 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0833%5 Sept →
cache13–100.1334%5 Sept →
anubis11–130.1226%5 Sept →
mirage5–130.0313%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0224%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0122%5 Sept →
dust213–60.0139%16 Aug →
dust213–40.1218%16 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0535%9 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0115%22 Jun →
nuke13–60.0416%5 May →
nuke13–60.0717%5 May →
ancient13–60.0616%5 May →
ancient3–13-0.0134%5 May →
mirage13–100.0517%2 May →
ancient4–13-0.0016%2 May →
ancient6–13-0.0421%2 May →
dust22–13-0.0827%2 May →
overpass13–100.018%1 May →
ancient13–4-0.0125%23 Apr →
dust213–90.0124%20 Apr →
overpass16–13-0.0118%20 Apr →
nuke13–110.0119%20 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0425%19 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0229%19 Apr →
ancient13–16-0.0117%19 Apr →
dust213–60.0213%19 Apr →
nuke16–120.0316%18 Apr →
ancient9–130.0314%16 Apr →
overpass13–80.0620%16 Apr →
ancient16–140.0332%16 Apr →
anubis12–16-0.0114%16 Apr →
ancient11–130.0122%15 Apr →
anubis10–130.0118%15 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.1011%9 Apr →
dust210–130.0017%9 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0015%9 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0519%9 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0517%7 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0224%7 Apr →
inferno8–8-0.0532%7 Apr →
mirage13–60.0916%4 Apr →
mirage13–70.1022%4 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0114%3 Apr →
inferno13–50.0417%3 Apr →
ancient13–70.0720%30 Mar →
inferno13–70.1023%30 Mar →
inferno2–90.0111%30 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.007%30 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0316%30 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0724%29 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0012%29 Mar →
inferno13–4-0.0223%29 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0627%29 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.