Fantorangen

Fantorangen — CS2 Stats

76561198156005205[U:1:195739477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

142Tracked matches55%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,235Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,811Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,811 -1,160 31 Aug – 30 Sept · 7 days played
17,81119,584peak 19,58431 Aug30 Sept
19,584Peak Premier in tracked matches
16Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,773 below peak (19,584)
  • -1,160 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,189 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate30.5%44.3%46.9%16.4% short
Shot accuracy16.4%11.9%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.031.08meets
Match win rate43.7%45.2%46.7%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFantorangenPREMIER17,811 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning80
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–26–12Last 10062%Win rateLLWWWWTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility3.7
Positioning8.0
Opening Duels7.2

Limited utility dependenceStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning8.0
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels7.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time560ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.42Best match rating · 9–1 · eldorado, 31 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · inferno, 30 Aug →
281msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · inferno, 30 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

eldoradoBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2516–964%0.05
nukeS2416–867%0.08
mirageS1812–667%0.05
dust2B84–450%0.05
ancientD82–625%0.00
eldoradoS54–180%0.12
vertigo—44–0100%0.11
cache—43–175%0.00
anubis—30–30%0.00
office—11–0100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,979Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
813Matches
43.7%Match win rate
30.5%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
1,873MVPs
308Hours (in match)
804Bombs planted
140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,650dust2
1,072nuke
681inferno
45vertigo
27lake
15train
13cbble
10office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
569msReaction time
57.2%T opening success
65.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.25HE damage / grenade
3.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4237 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0218%30 Sept →
ancient6–130.0618%30 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0430%26 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0611%23 Sept →
vertigo13–20.1422%23 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0423%20 Sept →
cache12–120.0822%20 Sept →
mirage8–130.0421%20 Sept →
dust213–20.1019%19 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.0950%19 Sept →
nuke9–50.0430%19 Sept →
inferno4–90.0120%19 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0220%19 Sept →
mirage7–130.0024%14 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0124%14 Sept →
mirage13–10.1619%13 Sept →
mirage13–50.0712%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0516%12 Sept →
mirage10–130.0213%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.076%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0220%12 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0613%12 Sept →
anubis11–130.0821%12 Sept →
mirage13–30.1427%12 Sept →
ancient11–130.0314%11 Sept →
mirage13–00.0733%11 Sept →
mirage13–00.1915%11 Sept →
mirage13–80.0824%11 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0126%6 Sept →
nuke9–20.1523%6 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0114%6 Sept →
nuke13–40.0112%6 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0825%5 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0121%5 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0217%5 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0423%5 Sept →
inferno9–00.1938%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0515%5 Sept →
office10–110.1422%4 Sept →
eldorado8–8-0.0117%31 Aug →
eldorado9–40.0816%31 Aug →
eldorado9–50.0625%31 Aug →
eldorado9–10.0810%31 Aug →
eldorado9–10.4211%31 Aug →
dust216–120.0913%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0717%31 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0321%31 Aug →
ancient13–60.0419%31 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0510%31 Aug →
inferno9–20.2118%31 Aug →
nuke8–80.0521%31 Aug →
nuke8–80.0516%31 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.2323%31 Aug →
nuke7–90.0214%31 Aug →
inferno9–60.0713%31 Aug →
inferno9–60.0314%31 Aug →
dust215–150.0423%30 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0224%30 Aug →
mirage16–140.0317%30 Aug →
dust213–60.0620%30 Aug →
nuke9–20.0919%30 Aug →
inferno9–40.1129%30 Aug →
inferno9–10.4042%30 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.1015%30 Aug →
inferno3–00.08100%30 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.0215%30 Aug →
inferno8–80.0611%29 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0518%29 Aug →
inferno9–40.2218%29 Aug →
nuke9–70.0019%29 Aug →
inferno9–20.1715%29 Aug →
inferno9–50.0423%29 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0713%29 Aug →
nuke9–00.184%29 Aug →
nuke9–30.1423%29 Aug →
inferno9–60.1020%29 Aug →
inferno8–80.0219%29 Aug →
nuke9–50.0327%29 Aug →
nuke9–50.0516%29 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0129%29 Aug →
inferno9–30.0025%29 Aug →
inferno9–10.1810%29 Aug →
inferno9–40.0319%29 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0122%29 Aug →
dust213–100.1022%29 Aug →
cache5–1-0.0610%29 Aug →
nuke9–60.1125%29 Aug →
nuke9–20.1711%29 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0219%29 Aug →
mirage13–90.0313%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.1012%28 Aug →
dust22–13-0.028%28 Aug →
nuke8–80.1922%28 Aug →
nuke8–130.0015%28 Aug →
nuke9–40.2529%28 Aug →
vertigo9–10.1920%28 Aug →
nuke9–20.2813%28 Aug →
nuke9–10.014%28 Aug →
nuke9–40.0725%28 Aug →
mirage13–20.1212%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.