Frankenmadl

Frankenmadl — CS2 Stats

GW76561198796321238[U:1:836055510]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

398Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
742Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating15,862Purple band · top ~25% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 398 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 26 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,862 +3,209 26 Apr5 Sept · 26 days played
11,66217,694peak 17,69426 Apr5 Sept
17,694Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-04-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,832 below peak (17,694)
  • +473 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,277 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,138 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=34,112), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate52.6%44.3%47.0%above
Shot accuracy2.8%11.8%13.0%10.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.031.08above
Match win rate42.8%45.2%46.7%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFrankenmadlPREMIER15,862 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning44
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateLWLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+5.3 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time591ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 22 Jul
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 11 Jun
430msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 2 Sept
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 19nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA25141156%-0.01
cacheA1911858%-0.01
anubisA169756%-0.03
infernoA127558%0.01
dust2B115645%-0.03
mirageC83538%-0.03
nukeD51420%-0.04
overpass32167%0.00
debris110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,461Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 25% of Purple band
1,089Matches
42.8%Match win rate
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band
2.8%Shot accuracy
1,888MVPs
408Hours (in match)
970Bombs planted
226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,391dust2
1,223nuke
955inferno
411vertigo
258train
62office
47italy
38bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
55%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.7ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

83%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3100%1.1719.3
Train20%0.8413.0
Mirage250%0.8015.5
Overpass250%1.5112.5
Inferno10%0.447.0
Ancient1100%1.2211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
583msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
39.0%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
10.59HE damage / grenade
4.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4311 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.0321% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–130.0320%4 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0416%2 Sept
cache10–13-0.049%2 Sept
anubis13–40.0117%31 Aug
ancient13–30.0019%31 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0716%31 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1011%23 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0230%23 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0513%23 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0116%10 Aug
cache13–11-0.0120%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0418%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0224%7 Aug
cache13–7-0.0211%7 Aug
cache13–7-0.0614%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0710%7 Aug
anubis14–16-0.079%6 Aug
inferno13–40.0714%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0720%6 Aug
inferno13–50.0121%6 Aug
dust28–130.0113%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0023%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0620%6 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0519%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0413%6 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0121%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0525%4 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0226%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0523%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0116%3 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0226%3 Aug
cache1–13-0.0830%3 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0522%30 Jul
ancient13–30.0417%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0916%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0518%30 Jul
inferno2–130.0321%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0714%24 Jul
cache13–60.0229%24 Jul
dust23–13-0.1014%24 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0317%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0513%22 Jul
debris9–60.1316%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0415%22 Jul
ancient13–20.0614%22 Jul
cache6–130.0726%22 Jul
dust22–13-0.0611%21 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0314%21 Jul
cache6–13-0.0016%21 Jul
cache13–8-0.018%19 Jul
dust213–9-0.0618%19 Jul
cache7–13-0.115%18 Jul
anubis11–13-0.019%18 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0511%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0610%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0512%18 Jul
cache13–5-0.0216%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0010%17 Jul
ancient13–70.0213%17 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0318%17 Jul
cache13–90.0315%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0314%16 Jul
ancient16–14-0.019%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0121%16 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0323%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0117%15 Jul
dust211–13-0.0420%15 Jul
cache13–11-0.0211%12 Jul
ancient13–60.0219%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.1211%12 Jul
cache13–40.0212%1 Jul
ancient13–90.0026%1 Jul
anubis13–100.0112%1 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0014%11 Jun
dust213–30.0231%11 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0415%11 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0318%9 Jun
ancient13–60.0525%9 Jun
cache8–13-0.0718%20 May
cache12–120.0112%13 May
ancient5–13-0.0616%13 May
overpass13–40.0722%13 May
ancient13–90.017%13 May
overpass13–7-0.0423%13 May
inferno13–10-0.0110%11 May
ancient13–50.0726%11 May
dust213–6-0.0726%11 May
anubis13–70.078%11 May
anubis13–8-0.0119%10 May
cache6–20.0910%10 May
ancient4–13-0.0310%10 May
nuke5–2-0.0717%10 May
cache8–13-0.0421%7 May
ancient11–13-0.0718%30 Apr
anubis7–13-0.1016%30 Apr
inferno13–60.0121%29 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0414%29 Apr
cache13–110.0112%29 Apr
dust213–50.0410%26 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0110%26 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →