Montana

Montana — CS2 Stats

IL76561198632284485[U:1:672018757]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

142Tracked matches50%Win rate2026Tracked since
77Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,427Light Blue band · top ~57.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,427 +1,763 26 Oct – 4 Nov · 9 days played
7,6649,774peak 9,77426 Oct4 Nov
10,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
16Days played since 2026-10-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 347 below peak (9,774)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 573 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate41.2%41.8%42.7%1.5% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.2%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.110.980.99above
Match win rate51.0%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMontanaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,427 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning63
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateLLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility1.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning6.3
Utility1.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.08
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time617ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.35Best match rating · 9–0 · poseidon, 29 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · inferno, 4 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · poseidon, 17 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L5Current streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 87% over 15dust2Weakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2210–1245%0.02
nukeS1913–668%0.01
poseidonS1513–287%0.12
mirageB115–645%0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.02
dust2C73–443%0.01
cacheA53–260%0.02
office—42–250%0.05
ancient—44–0100%-0.00
debris—10–10%-0.08
eldorado—10–10%-0.22
overpass—11–0100%0.30
vertigo—10–10%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,035Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
296Matches
51.0%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 3 players
41.2%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
847MVPs
77Hours (in match)
286Bombs planted
57Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

506inferno
390nuke
271dust2
161office
54vertigo
17train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
45%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1040%1.0815.2
Ancient1030%0.7011.8
Mirage978%1.0013.2
Cache714%0.8316.3
Nuke667%1.1117.0
Dust2540%1.2315.8
Inferno250%1.6220.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
570msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.15Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.78HE damage / grenade
1.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1056% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1451 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.065%4 Nov →
anubis2–13-0.0413%4 Nov →
inferno4–9-0.160%4 Nov →
inferno7–90.0550%4 Nov →
inferno4–9-0.179%4 Nov →
inferno9–30.0211%4 Nov →
office11–130.0213%4 Nov →
inferno5–9-0.1715%4 Nov →
inferno4–9-0.1020%4 Nov →
nuke9–30.0014%4 Nov →
cache8–130.0019%4 Nov →
mirage13–60.0012%4 Nov →
anubis13–10.0823%4 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.1014%3 Nov →
debris7–9-0.0818%3 Nov →
inferno5–9-0.0816%3 Nov →
nuke9–00.2218%3 Nov →
ancient13–60.0017%3 Nov →
office13–10.1117%3 Nov →
anubis13–60.0412%2 Nov →
nuke2–9-0.1224%2 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.037%2 Nov →
nuke6–9-0.009%1 Nov →
cache13–50.135%31 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0418%30 Oct →
office13–80.0518%30 Oct →
poseidon5–9-0.0822%29 Oct →
poseidon9–00.3038%29 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0521%29 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.037%29 Oct →
poseidon0–9-0.2633%29 Oct →
poseidon9–70.1616%29 Oct →
poseidon9–50.1217%29 Oct →
poseidon9–4-0.0111%29 Oct →
poseidon9–40.1929%29 Oct →
poseidon9–00.1815%29 Oct →
poseidon9–00.3515%29 Oct →
inferno9–30.060%29 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.013%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0324%28 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0320%28 Oct →
dust213–30.094%28 Oct →
mirage13–30.1414%28 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0314%28 Oct →
poseidon9–20.1024%28 Oct →
inferno7–90.0318%28 Oct →
nuke13–50.0218%27 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0918%27 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.0121%27 Oct →
inferno8–80.0918%27 Oct →
nuke9–60.0210%27 Oct →
nuke9–4-0.0612%27 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.119%27 Oct →
inferno9–40.1917%27 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.019%26 Oct →
ancient13–70.0222%26 Oct →
mirage11–130.0210%26 Oct →
nuke13–40.0527%26 Oct →
dust213–80.068%26 Oct →
inferno7–130.0311%26 Oct →
dust25–110.0216%25 Oct →
cache16–140.0114%25 Oct →
nuke1–9-0.280%25 Oct →
mirage13–60.016%25 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.1014%25 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0510%25 Oct →
cache13–8-0.028%25 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0314%24 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0712%24 Oct →
anubis13–90.0311%24 Oct →
anubis13–80.0111%24 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0120%24 Oct →
eldorado4–9-0.226%24 Oct →
overpass9–10.3019%24 Oct →
dust210–130.0320%24 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0520%24 Oct →
nuke13–70.039%24 Oct →
mirage4–9-0.027%23 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0430%23 Oct →
ancient13–30.0110%17 Oct →
poseidon9–50.0126%17 Oct →
poseidon9–20.2011%17 Oct →
poseidon9–20.1916%17 Oct →
vertigo8–80.097%17 Oct →
nuke9–50.0520%17 Oct →
mirage13–00.1212%17 Oct →
nuke8–80.007%17 Oct →
office12–120.0224%15 Oct →
poseidon9–50.1121%15 Oct →
poseidon9–40.1826%15 Oct →
nuke8–80.0115%15 Oct →
inferno9–70.0215%15 Oct →
nuke9–00.2922%15 Oct →
inferno9–10.1620%15 Oct →
inferno9–20.2032%15 Oct →
nuke9–20.1426%15 Oct →
nuke9–40.0217%15 Oct →
inferno9–20.2326%15 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0516%15 Oct →
inferno9–10.2723%14 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.