ko

ko — CS2 Stats

PL76561198448831200[U:1:488565472]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

465Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,373Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,762Top 25% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#46509 of 260208 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,151 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,762 +3,661 13 Jun – 28 Oct · 21 days played
18,44224,885peak 24,88513 Jun28 Oct
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,151Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-06-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,151
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,123 below peak (24,885)
  • +1,043 over 30 days · improving
  • +156 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,238 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate52.6%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy15.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.641.021.03above
Match win rate48.6%44.7%45.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkoFACEITLevel 5 · 1,151 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,762 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,151csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning58
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–50–9Last 10041%Win rateLWLWTLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time587ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 4 Nov →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–5 · mirage, 1 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 8–3 · inferno, 15 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · train, 18 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 16ancientWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C188–1044%0.00
nukeB178–947%0.00
ancientD174–1324%-0.00
infernoA169–756%0.01
mirageC114–736%-0.00
anubisC114–736%-0.02
overpass—41–325%0.03
cache—32–167%0.02
train—21–150%-0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,261Lifetime kills
1.64K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
1,665Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
5,796MVPs
727Hours (in match)
1,347Bombs planted
842Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,280dust2
1,764inferno
1,056nuke
835vertigo
154train
103safehouse
85lake
34ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
47%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22650%1.0116.0
Mirage1450%1.0414.3
Nuke1464%1.2317.7
Ancient1421%0.9216.0
Inferno1060%0.9313.2
Anubis650%1.1418.8
Overpass250%1.1219.0
Train10%1.2823.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
590msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
11.42HE damage / grenade
5.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3037% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno0–9-0.1713%4 Nov →
nuke9–70.0828%4 Nov →
overpass5–90.0124%4 Nov →
inferno9–40.1816%4 Nov →
inferno8–8-0.0216%4 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0126%1 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0713%28 Oct →
nuke2–130.0219%28 Oct →
dust29–130.0210%20 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0114%19 Oct →
dust29–13-0.065%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0333%15 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0323%15 Oct →
inferno8–30.0525%15 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0218%12 Oct →
dust21–6-0.0040%12 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0211%8 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0619%6 Oct →
mirage13–50.0520%6 Oct →
dust213–70.1319%29 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0313%28 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0817%26 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0219%26 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0120%24 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0624%18 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0310%17 Sept →
nuke13–80.0424%17 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0115%10 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0116%8 Sept →
ancient7–130.0227%8 Sept →
anubis13–90.0314%8 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0013%8 Sept →
mirage1–5-0.0050%1 Sept →
nuke13–80.0121%1 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0613%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0415%16 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.0521%16 Aug →
ancient10–130.0316%16 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0016%16 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0226%16 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0025%16 Aug →
mirage1–12-0.0138%15 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.1312%14 Aug →
dust213–30.0321%14 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0216%13 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.069%13 Aug →
dust210–130.0211%10 Aug →
dust213–80.0418%10 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0220%9 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0411%9 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0330%9 Aug →
nuke13–100.0424%1 Aug →
dust213–70.0220%1 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0626%1 Aug →
ancient15–150.0518%1 Aug →
dust28–130.0224%30 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0227%28 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0331%28 Jul →
nuke11–130.0324%28 Jul →
ancient13–70.0714%27 Jul →
cache11–130.0229%27 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0026%27 Jul →
ancient8–130.0119%21 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0320%21 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0126%21 Jul →
nuke10–130.0515%21 Jul →
inferno13–90.0118%16 Jul →
nuke12–2-0.0413%14 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0229%14 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0411%10 Jul →
inferno13–30.1526%10 Jul →
ancient5–130.0127%10 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0329%9 Jul →
dust213–90.0214%9 Jul →
overpass15–150.0215%5 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0117%5 Jul →
ancient4–130.0312%5 Jul →
anubis6–130.0424%4 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0938%4 Jul →
ancient10–130.0828%4 Jul →
inferno13–110.0612%4 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0311%3 Jul →
nuke12–120.0130%3 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0320%29 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0915%29 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0218%28 Jun →
nuke13–160.0117%28 Jun →
mirage13–90.0019%28 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0117%28 Jun →
nuke13–70.0321%28 Jun →
inferno13–60.0526%23 Jun →
overpass12–120.0331%23 Jun →
dust212–120.0632%18 Jun →
train13–1-0.0643%18 Jun →
train5–13-0.0233%18 Jun →
cache13–110.0729%16 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0235%14 Jun →
inferno5–130.0328%14 Jun →
overpass13–90.0425%13 Jun →
mirage12–120.1624%10 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.