Zekroming — CS2 Stats
US76561198059987358[U:1:99721630]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 1,035
- Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 16 to go
- Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
- Level 4 first seen 2026-09-07
- Level 3 first seen 2026-09-07
Premier CS Rating
- At peak — 21,164
- +1,276 over 30 days · improving
- Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,836 to go
- Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction
Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 4–1 · 80% win rate
- Avg rating 0.05
- Avg headshot accuracy 21%
- Avg reaction 452ms
Last 10
- 6–4 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.06
- Avg headshot accuracy 26%
- Avg reaction 481ms
Last 20
- 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
- Avg rating 0.08
- Avg headshot accuracy 26%
- Avg reaction 503ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).
Limited utility dependenceStrong positioning
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 57% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
T openings. 76% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 nuke | B | 30 | 14–16 | 47% | 0.06 |
 vertigo | B | 20 | 10–10 | 50% | 0.09 |
| office | D | 19 | 5–14 | 26% | 0.07 |
 inferno | C | 12 | 5–7 | 42% | 0.09 |
 train | D | 7 | 2–5 | 29% | 0.04 |
 dust2 | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.06 |
 anubis | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.03 |
 mirage | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.06 |
 cache | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.06 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 12 | 50% | 1.19 | 14.7 |
| Dust2 | 8 | 50% | 1.52 | 17.6 |
| Nuke | 7 | 43% | 0.88 | 12.7 |
| Mirage | 5 | 40% | 0.87 | 14.2 |
| Anubis | 5 | 40% | 0.61 | 10.8 |
| Inferno | 2 | 100% | 1.05 | 14.5 |
| Overpass | 1 | 100% | 1.18 | 13.0 |
| Train | 1 | 100% | 2.25 | 18.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3287 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inferno | 13–11 | 0.02 | 22% | 16 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 13–11 | 0.05 | 25% | 14 Oct → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 14 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.05 | 14% | 14 Oct → | |
| office | 13–10 | 0.08 | 28% | 13 Oct → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | 0.04 | 38% | 13 Oct → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.02 | 26% | 13 Oct → | |
| train | 13–8 | 0.11 | 16% | 12 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 10–13 | 0.03 | 31% | 11 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.12 | 40% | 11 Oct → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.07 | 39% | 10 Oct → | |
| inferno | 12–12 | 0.13 | 28% | 10 Oct → | |
| office | 11–13 | 0.11 | 18% | 9 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 13–7 | 0.15 | 24% | 9 Oct → | |
| train | 5–13 | 0.05 | 24% | 9 Oct → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | 0.13 | 24% | 8 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 13–10 | 0.13 | 27% | 7 Oct → | |
| office | 8–13 | 0.10 | 30% | 6 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 13–5 | 0.13 | 17% | 6 Oct → | |
| train | 4–13 | -0.04 | 20% | 6 Oct → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | 0.06 | 19% | 5 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.11 | 28% | 5 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 13–11 | 0.09 | 16% | 5 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 5 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 8–13 | 0.09 | 19% | 5 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.06 | 32% | 4 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 4–13 | 0.01 | 32% | 4 Oct → | |
| office | 13–11 | 0.17 | 29% | 3 Oct → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.11 | 27% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 0–2 | -0.01 | 25% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.09 | 23% | 2 Oct → | |
| anubis | 6–13 | -0.06 | 19% | 2 Oct → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.00 | 24% | 1 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.09 | 28% | 30 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 30 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.08 | 28% | 28 Sept → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.06 | 23% | 28 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | 0.15 | 22% | 28 Sept → | |
| train | 13–7 | 0.08 | 28% | 28 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.07 | 25% | 27 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.10 | 20% | 27 Sept → | |
| office | 12–12 | 0.11 | 23% | 27 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 5–4 | 0.27 | 67% | 26 Sept → | |
| train | 8–13 | 0.03 | 30% | 26 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.07 | 34% | 25 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 10–13 | 0.11 | 28% | 24 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.21 | 28% | 24 Sept → | |
| office | 8–13 | 0.04 | 27% | 24 Sept → | |
| office | 5–13 | 0.07 | 16% | 22 Sept → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 21 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–11 | 0.23 | 33% | 21 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–8 | 0.14 | 29% | 20 Sept → | |
| office | 13–5 | 0.07 | 25% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.05 | 14% | 19 Sept → | |
| anubis | 5–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 19 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.05 | 18% | 19 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 7–13 | 0.09 | 25% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.06 | 23% | 19 Sept → | |
| office | 6–13 | 0.04 | 26% | 18 Sept → | |
| nuke | 10–10 | 0.06 | 30% | 18 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–8 | 0.02 | 21% | 16 Sept → | |
| office | 8–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 16 Sept → | |
| office | 0–6 | -0.01 | 40% | 15 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–11 | 0.14 | 31% | 15 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–9 | 0.04 | 34% | 13 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | -0.02 | 31% | 13 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.08 | 16% | 13 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.05 | 11% | 12 Sept → | |
| anubis | 16–14 | 0.05 | 25% | 12 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.00 | 21% | 11 Sept → | |
| office | 0–13 | -0.07 | 29% | 10 Sept → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.07 | 37% | 10 Sept → | |
| office | 12–12 | 0.09 | 45% | 9 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | 0.10 | 30% | 8 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–8 | 0.15 | 27% | 7 Sept → | |
| office | 9–13 | 0.10 | 26% | 5 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 11–13 | 0.09 | 29% | 4 Sept → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.09 | 39% | 4 Sept → | |
| office | 3–13 | -0.06 | 33% | 4 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.08 | 25% | 2 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.23 | 20% | 31 Aug → | |
| office | 13–7 | 0.06 | 46% | 30 Aug → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.17 | 31% | 28 Aug → | |
| office | 9–13 | 0.21 | 30% | 24 Aug → | |
| office | 5–13 | 0.01 | 31% | 24 Aug → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.00 | 18% | 24 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | 0.02 | 31% | 16 Aug → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.08 | 14% | 13 Aug → | |
| train | 2–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 13 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.03 | 16% | 12 Aug → | |
| office | 13–7 | 0.29 | 45% | 11 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.14 | 34% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.05 | 23% | 7 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.13 | 25% | 6 Aug → | |
| train | 4–13 | 0.09 | 19% | 6 Aug → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.03 | 21% | 6 Aug → | |
| nuke | 3–7 | 0.02 | 28% | 6 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.08 | 18% | 1 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | -0.00 | 20% | 1 Aug → | |
| inferno | 15–15 | 0.05 | 23% | 1 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.