grass

grass — CS2 Stats

ET76561198446350531[U:1:486084803]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,027Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,811Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,640Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75334 of 261563 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,594 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (52 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1315Premier CS Rating · 21,955 → 20,640
0Faceit ELO · 1,594 → 1,594
+95Tracked matches · now 1,027
−4.7ppWin rate · 41.4% → 36.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,640 +534 7 Jun – 14 Nov · 28 days played
19,71924,736peak 24,7367 Jun14 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,594 +0 3 Sept – 23 Sept · 6 observations
1,5941,594peak 1,5943 Sept23 Sept
24,844Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,594Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-06-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,594
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 157 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,096 below peak (24,736)
  • -3,275 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,360 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.6%45.7%46.8%6.2% short
Shot accuracy11.4%12.7%13.0%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.051.060.07 short
Match win rate48.0%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgrassFACEITLevel 7 · 1,594 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,640 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,594csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning48
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time522ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 23 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · overpass, 28 Jun →
297msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 31 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 40% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3012–1840%-0.01
mirageA2112–957%-0.01
anubisC167–944%0.01
nukeB126–650%-0.02
dust2B115–645%-0.01
ancientS86–275%-0.01
cache—11–0100%-0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,553Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
5,239Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
40.6%Headshot %
11.4%Shot accuracy
12,720MVPs
1,640Hours (in match)
2,936Bombs planted
1,217Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP17,930
AK-4715,965
Knife2,163
FAMAS1,733
P901,418

Lifetime map wins

10,858inferno
4,041dust2
2,266vertigo
2,215nuke
552train
264cbble
262office
230italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

553Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
79.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18552%1.2615.8
Dust28552%1.1315.8
Ancient8060%1.1817.2
Inferno7250%1.3016.3
Nuke5044%1.1715.1
Anubis4641%0.9414.0
Vertigo2129%0.9113.1
Overpass825%0.8913.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
514msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
5.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4262 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.6187% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0527%14 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.1020%10 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0017%31 Oct →
inferno9–30.0930%30 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0021%30 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0313%15 Oct →
nuke13–70.015%15 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0822%9 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0214%8 Oct →
mirage18–22-0.0115%4 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.014%26 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0220%26 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1117%26 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0213%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0217%9 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0716%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0222%4 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0420%4 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0813%4 Sept →
ancient0–4-0.0267%30 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.1622%30 Aug →
dust211–20.0225%30 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0811%30 Aug →
anubis8–130.0316%25 Aug →
nuke13–60.0614%25 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0119%25 Aug →
mirage4–130.0317%25 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.1025%24 Aug →
nuke8–130.0025%24 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0723%24 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0224%23 Aug →
anubis4–80.0717%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.0718%23 Aug →
inferno9–20.2528%23 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0023%23 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0132%23 Aug →
inferno9–20.0435%22 Aug →
inferno6–90.0522%22 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.087%22 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0817%22 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0212%22 Aug →
mirage13–50.0329%22 Aug →
mirage8–130.0232%22 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.0619%22 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.2021%22 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.088%22 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.1140%22 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0220%22 Aug →
inferno8–80.0411%22 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.0518%22 Aug →
inferno9–30.0223%22 Aug →
inferno9–50.0117%22 Aug →
inferno9–00.2053%22 Aug →
inferno9–60.1016%22 Aug →
inferno9–50.0916%15 Aug →
inferno7–90.0322%15 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0733%15 Aug →
mirage15–150.0114%14 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0710%14 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0518%12 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0425%11 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0726%11 Aug →
cache13–5-0.059%10 Aug →
mirage13–80.1130%10 Aug →
inferno9–6-0.0625%3 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0111%3 Aug →
anubis3–130.0325%3 Aug →
ancient13–100.0323%3 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0824%3 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1220%2 Aug →
inferno9–50.0915%2 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0118%2 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0410%31 Jul →
ancient13–0-0.0350%31 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0511%30 Jul →
mirage13–110.0232%29 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0123%24 Jul →
dust213–20.0318%24 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0420%23 Jul →
nuke13–1-0.0014%23 Jul →
anubis13–80.0213%13 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0114%13 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0024%10 Jul →
anubis1–9-0.0533%9 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0218%4 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0424%2 Jul →
mirage13–110.0723%2 Jul →
anubis13–100.0417%2 Jul →
overpass0–13-0.03100%28 Jun →
anubis13–40.0810%28 Jun →
nuke13–110.0412%20 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0019%14 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0115%13 Jun →
anubis15–150.0217%13 Jun →
inferno9–4-0.0814%12 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.104%12 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0114%12 Jun →
dust213–90.0315%12 Jun →
anubis1–5-0.0636%12 Jun →
anubis13–100.0619%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.