◈ Cyclops ◈

◈ Cyclops ◈ — CS2 Stats

NL76561198427060833[U:1:466795105]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,089Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,253Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#36975 of 261701 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,638 -748 6 Apr – 28 Jun · 12 days played
23,63825,695peak 25,6956 Apr28 Jun
25,891Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-04-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,553), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.0%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy18.0%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.571.071.09above
Match win rate53.3%46.9%48.4%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG◈ Cyclops ◈FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–49–8Last 10043%Win rateLLLLLWLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.6
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time561ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 25 Apr →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · cache, 1 May →
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 11 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 25 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 13mirageWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC228–1436%0.03
infernoC208–1240%0.03
cacheB209–1145%0.06
dust2B137–654%0.04
anubisC104–640%0.03
nukeC94–544%0.02
ancient—21–150%0.05
poseidon—11–0100%0.16
sanctum—11–0100%0.15
overpass—10–10%-0.00
office—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

105,122Lifetime kills
1.57K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
3,763Matches
53.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
53.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
27,583MVPs
1,998Hours (in match)
2,820Bombs planted
3,425Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,711
AWP16,918
SSG 082,741
MAC-101,913
SG 5531,662
Knife1,417

Lifetime map wins

5,790inferno
3,929dust2
2,751nuke
2,425vertigo
1,411train
784cbble
199office
194lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

304Matches
57%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
95.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3256%1.4522.3
Dust22357%1.3118.1
Inferno1850%1.4217.9
Anubis1471%1.4119.4
Nuke1258%1.3120.5
Ancient838%1.0515.0
Vertigo30%1.5026.7
Cache10%0.9121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
559msReaction time
57.4%T opening success
30.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
11.73HE damage / grenade
4.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.8534% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–130.0938%11 Nov →
mirage8–130.0618%9 Nov →
ancient8–130.0520%9 Nov →
nuke9–130.0221%31 Oct →
dust25–130.009%31 Oct →
dust213–90.0119%31 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0524%31 Oct →
mirage11–130.0418%30 Oct →
inferno12–120.0420%27 Oct →
mirage13–40.0520%19 Oct →
poseidon9–50.1613%13 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0011%12 Oct →
mirage7–130.1217%4 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0235%4 Oct →
dust215–150.0326%3 Oct →
inferno13–110.0122%3 Oct →
nuke13–60.0017%3 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.1013%3 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1518%3 Oct →
cache6–130.0726%20 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1625%20 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0110%30 Jul →
nuke13–70.0629%30 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0220%30 Jul →
mirage15–150.0817%30 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0321%29 Jul →
dust28–130.1525%28 Jul →
mirage3–130.0430%28 Jul →
inferno13–50.0729%28 Jul →
anubis13–90.049%28 Jul →
nuke13–40.1023%24 Jul →
inferno6–130.0524%21 Jul →
anubis11–130.0223%14 Jul →
cache13–30.0731%13 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0228%29 Jun →
inferno2–9-0.0732%28 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.019%28 Jun →
inferno9–7-0.1227%23 Jun →
inferno9–60.1437%23 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0227%22 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0526%17 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0222%17 Jun →
dust213–30.0930%8 Jun →
dust213–100.1135%8 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0229%3 Jun →
sanctum9–50.1524%1 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0214%27 May →
nuke5–130.0047%27 May →
overpass8–13-0.0024%25 May →
mirage13–10.0812%25 May →
anubis13–100.0823%25 May →
mirage4–13-0.0029%25 May →
cache12–120.0820%24 May →
mirage5–130.0226%24 May →
inferno9–30.1618%21 May →
cache10–130.0631%19 May →
inferno11–130.1431%14 May →
anubis4–13-0.0219%13 May →
cache12–120.0324%13 May →
nuke7–130.069%10 May →
mirage13–6-0.0213%10 May →
inferno9–60.0211%10 May →
mirage13–160.0819%9 May →
dust213–8-0.0210%9 May →
inferno8–80.0535%9 May →
ancient13–60.0536%9 May →
mirage16–120.0115%9 May →
cache0–7-0.0236%9 May →
cache7–130.1225%6 May →
cache7–130.0624%5 May →
dust213–60.1830%5 May →
cache13–60.0129%5 May →
dust24–130.0620%5 May →
cache2–130.0424%5 May →
cache13–70.0821%3 May →
cache4–130.0114%3 May →
mirage4–13-0.0219%3 May →
anubis13–30.1919%3 May →
mirage13–80.0713%3 May →
mirage9–13-0.0626%3 May →
nuke11–13-0.0126%1 May →
anubis14–160.0227%1 May →
inferno15–150.0118%1 May →
dust216–140.0335%1 May →
cache2–00.1567%1 May →
cache13–10-0.0315%1 May →
anubis9–13-0.0025%29 Apr →
mirage10–130.0921%29 Apr →
cache6–130.0333%29 Apr →
cache13–8-0.0324%29 Apr →
cache13–100.1523%29 Apr →
cache13–110.1023%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0821%29 Apr →
cache5–130.0718%29 Apr →
inferno9–20.2326%25 Apr →
mirage13–100.0617%25 Apr →
office1–13-0.0150%25 Apr →
inferno9–20.2640%25 Apr →
nuke13–90.0413%19 Apr →
mirage11–130.0716%6 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.