Larson

Larson — CS2 Stats

VI76561198393479935[U:1:433214207]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,177Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,608Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#55077 of 260005 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (49 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+9Tracked matches · now 1,177
0.0ppWin rate · 55.6% → 55.6%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,105 +1,473 19 Jun – 17 Sept · 6 days played
20,63222,978peak 22,97819 Jun17 Sept
23,078Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,498Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLarsonPEAK ELO1,498csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–31–9Last 10060%Win rateLTWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility2.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility2.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time611ms+81ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy29.8%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 29.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · alpine, 16 Apr →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 27 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · office, 22 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 27 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

alpineBest map · 90% over 10nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeA2715–1256%0.01
cacheB2513–1252%0.01
alpineS109–190%0.04
vertigoS98–189%0.04
anubisA85–363%-0.02
nukeD72–529%-0.01
inferno—43–175%0.02
boulder—21–150%-0.01
mirage—20–20%-0.03
ancient—21–150%-0.00
train—10–10%0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%0.03
shelter—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,379Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
3,314Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
44.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
11,286MVPs
1,435Hours (in match)
4,096Bombs planted
1,036Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,515
AWP6,942
FAMAS2,282
MAC-101,500
MP91,485

Lifetime map wins

4,494inferno
3,395nuke
3,227vertigo
3,209train
1,747dust2
1,628office
495cbble
280lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

205Matches
53%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
93.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
39%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%1.1219.0
Nuke667%1.9023.7
Inferno540%1.4821.0
Ancient580%1.3316.6
Dust2520%1.2117.8
Cache367%1.0715.7
Overpass2100%1.5820.0
Anubis1100%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.3%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
603msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
55.5%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
5.53HE damage / grenade
3.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2926 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2524% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.0340%27 Oct →
cache15–150.0424%27 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0335%8 Oct →
office13–8-0.0217%5 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0130%5 Oct →
nuke3–130.0221%25 Sept →
anubis13–20.0230%25 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0322%23 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0525%21 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0214%29 Jul →
cache7–130.0229%22 Jul →
train12–120.0226%22 Jul →
cache5–130.0727%19 Jul →
cache16–140.0244%19 Jul →
vertigo13–100.0930%19 Jul →
cache13–50.0132%14 Jul →
boulder12–12-0.0419%12 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0127%12 Jul →
fachwerk13–40.0342%9 Jul →
shelter13–60.0435%9 Jul →
boulder13–110.0232%9 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0827%8 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0344%7 Jul →
vertigo13–10-0.0512%7 Jul →
office13–10-0.0235%6 Jul →
nuke8–130.0231%6 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0321%6 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0133%5 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0341%5 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0631%4 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0530%4 Jul →
ancient15–150.0125%4 Jul →
inferno13–40.0253%4 Jul →
nuke9–130.0232%4 Jul →
inferno13–30.1153%3 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0313%3 Jul →
office8–130.0130%3 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0422%28 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0933%24 Jun →
cache13–30.0518%24 Jun →
cache13–80.0826%19 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0717%19 Jun →
vertigo13–50.0938%3 Jun →
cache1–13-0.0335%2 Jun →
alpine7–13-0.0126%2 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0329%31 May →
vertigo13–11-0.0012%30 May →
cache13–10.0063%27 May →
cache13–100.0728%26 May →
cache13–70.0328%24 May →
vertigo13–30.1024%23 May →
cache13–7-0.0314%17 May →
cache13–10.0429%16 May →
cache12–120.0639%15 May →
cache13–110.0631%14 May →
cache9–130.0118%30 Apr →
vertigo9–40.0122%30 Apr →
cache10–130.0123%29 Apr →
inferno13–60.0118%27 Apr →
alpine13–70.0817%26 Apr →
office4–13-0.0823%23 Apr →
office10–13-0.0226%22 Apr →
inferno2–8-0.0710%19 Apr →
alpine13–11-0.0216%19 Apr →
nuke13–110.0420%18 Apr →
alpine13–6-0.0243%18 Apr →
office12–12-0.0316%18 Apr →
office8–13-0.140%17 Apr →
alpine13–10.0514%17 Apr →
alpine13–30.1725%16 Apr →
alpine13–5-0.0224%16 Apr →
office13–30.0627%16 Apr →
alpine13–80.1126%15 Apr →
office1–9-0.188%15 Apr →
office13–70.0630%14 Apr →
alpine13–60.0724%14 Apr →
office13–11-0.0126%14 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0419%13 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0111%13 Apr →
office12–120.0629%13 Apr →
vertigo13–60.0424%12 Apr →
alpine13–80.0226%12 Apr →
office9–130.0527%12 Apr →
office13–70.0938%11 Apr →
office13–80.0438%11 Apr →
office12–12-0.0338%11 Apr →
office13–10.0731%9 Apr →
office13–30.1450%9 Apr →
office13–40.1160%9 Apr →
vertigo7–130.0314%8 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0111%8 Apr →
vertigo13–50.0521%8 Apr →
office3–13-0.0324%8 Apr →
office13–70.0820%8 Apr →
office13–70.0618%8 Apr →
office13–110.0030%7 Apr →
office10–130.0216%6 Apr →
office13–30.0131%6 Apr →
office13–8-0.0529%6 Apr →
office11–13-0.0824%6 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.