HE4T

HE4T — CS2 Stats

KR76561198391131613[U:1:430865885]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,861Tracked matches71%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,925Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,385Top 10% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11148 of 261486 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,265 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,385 +882 2 Sept – 12 Nov · 9 days played
25,50326,385peak 26,3852 Sept12 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,265 +0 2 Sept – 21 Sept · 3 observations
1,2651,265peak 1,2652 Sept21 Sept
26,600Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,265Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,265
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 86 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,385
  • +866 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,615 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate56.6%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy3.0%12.0%12.4%9.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.951.021.03above
Match win rate51.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHE4TFACEITLevel 5 · 1,265 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER26,385 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,265csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning76
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–34–11Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility4.8
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels7.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning7.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time487ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 474ms → last ⅓ avg 487ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 18 Oct →
49%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · office, 31 Oct →
367msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · inferno, 4 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2815–1354%0.05
ancientA1610–663%0.07
infernoB158–753%0.07
dust2B105–550%0.05
anubisS107–370%0.06
nukeC83–538%0.08
cacheC83–538%0.06
train—32–167%0.10
office—11–0100%0.11
vertigo—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

103,279Lifetime kills
1.95K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
2,772Matches
51.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 5 players
56.6%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
3.0%Shot accuracy
10,101MVPs
1,210Hours (in match)
2,453Bombs planted
922Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,756
AWP2,808
MP92,510
MAC-101,321
FAMAS1,257

Lifetime map wins

4,559dust2
3,878inferno
2,191nuke
1,083train
960vertigo
352office
95lake
57italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
80%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
86.9ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2367%1.4619.3
Mirage3100%1.5020.3
Inferno2100%1.1916.5
Ancient10%0.5811.0
Anubis1100%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
485msReaction time
64.1%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.32HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0727%12 Nov →
dust26–130.0526%12 Nov →
dust213–60.0733%12 Nov →
mirage13–90.0422%31 Oct →
office13–70.1149%31 Oct →
nuke13–70.1330%31 Oct →
ancient13–10.1341%31 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0325%31 Oct →
anubis13–10.0225%31 Oct →
mirage11–70.0725%23 Oct →
vertigo13–20.1022%23 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0414%23 Oct →
inferno13–110.0935%23 Oct →
anubis13–00.1133%23 Oct →
nuke11–130.0524%23 Oct →
mirage13–50.0428%18 Oct →
mirage13–70.1923%18 Oct →
dust213–60.0232%18 Oct →
nuke13–80.0731%10 Oct →
ancient13–00.0713%10 Oct →
dust214–160.0324%10 Oct →
mirage13–100.0724%10 Oct →
ancient13–90.0928%3 Oct →
mirage12–120.0620%3 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.070%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.0825%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0620%3 Oct →
mirage12–120.0423%2 Oct →
mirage10–130.0933%27 Sept →
anubis13–70.0316%26 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0124%26 Sept →
inferno13–50.0626%26 Sept →
mirage13–20.0437%26 Sept →
inferno12–120.0533%19 Sept →
anubis12–120.0824%19 Sept →
cache13–30.0729%19 Sept →
nuke8–130.1021%18 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0127%18 Sept →
mirage12–120.0727%18 Sept →
inferno3–130.1131%18 Sept →
cache8–130.1222%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0934%12 Sept →
mirage13–70.0625%11 Sept →
dust212–120.0337%11 Sept →
inferno12–120.0429%11 Sept →
anubis7–00.0719%11 Sept →
mirage5–130.0627%11 Sept →
cache13–70.0332%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0222%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0419%7 Sept →
cache11–130.1730%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0126%5 Sept →
ancient9–130.1142%5 Sept →
train13–10.1631%5 Sept →
dust213–60.1333%4 Sept →
mirage10–130.0518%4 Sept →
inferno12–120.0230%4 Sept →
inferno9–40.1624%4 Sept →
mirage7–130.0726%3 Sept →
anubis10–130.0932%3 Sept →
mirage13–70.1122%1 Sept →
anubis13–110.0314%1 Sept →
ancient13–50.1124%30 Aug →
cache13–60.0631%30 Aug →
cache11–130.0425%30 Aug →
inferno13–90.0517%30 Aug →
ancient13–60.0438%26 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0312%26 Aug →
inferno9–130.1025%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.1423%25 Aug →
inferno13–10.1030%25 Aug →
nuke13–60.1529%22 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0311%22 Aug →
anubis13–50.1120%22 Aug →
ancient13–80.0315%22 Aug →
ancient9–130.0422%21 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0227%21 Aug →
mirage13–70.1418%21 Aug →
nuke7–130.1142%20 Aug →
ancient9–130.0643%20 Aug →
inferno8–130.0425%20 Aug →
mirage13–90.0631%20 Aug →
ancient13–80.1526%17 Aug →
mirage7–130.0639%17 Aug →
inferno10–130.0113%15 Aug →
mirage12–120.0115%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.1023%15 Aug →
train13–20.0919%15 Aug →
dust213–70.1531%15 Aug →
inferno13–30.0929%14 Aug →
train11–130.0539%14 Aug →
mirage13–100.0722%14 Aug →
dust212–120.0534%14 Aug →
mirage6–130.0521%13 Aug →
ancient13–10.0215%13 Aug →
cache4–130.0221%13 Aug →
mirage1–1-0.020%13 Aug →
inferno13–40.0733%12 Aug →
nuke12–120.1232%12 Aug →
ancient13–50.0619%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.