Houdinski

Houdinski — CS2 Stats

ER76561198368597271[U:1:408331543]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

279Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,889Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 -3,629 1 May – 8 Nov · 20 days played
9,99914,885peak 14,8851 May8 Nov
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,886 below peak (14,885)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,677), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate47.9%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy13.1%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.910.980.990.08 short
Match win rate46.2%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHoudinskiFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,999 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning36
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–48–6Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility3.0
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning3.6
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time630ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 6 Jun →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 22 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 24 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2713–1448%-0.02
infernoB209–1145%-0.02
dust2D155–1033%-0.01
ancientA148–657%-0.01
anubisC114–736%-0.04
nukeA85–363%-0.04
overpass—32–167%-0.02
cache—20–20%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,721Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,539Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
47.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,861MVPs
707Hours (in match)
993Bombs planted
273Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,620inferno
1,249dust2
483nuke
188vertigo
147train
65cbble
11stmarc
4lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

68Matches
40%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
71.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2148%0.9513.2
Inferno1436%0.8113.9
Ancient1136%0.7513.1
Nuke944%0.7913.6
Dust2729%0.7311.9
Anubis333%0.7412.3
Cache333%1.0619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
632msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
39.4%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
5.40HE damage / grenade
3.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.5854 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8029% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–12-0.0412%8 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0410%8 Nov →
nuke13–100.0514%8 Nov →
mirage6–130.0714%7 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0919%31 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0811%31 Oct →
dust29–13-0.103%31 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0424%31 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0433%23 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0425%22 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0620%22 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0223%19 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.1010%22 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.087%22 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0350%22 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0821%21 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0210%18 Jul →
ancient13–80.057%18 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0716%17 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0231%17 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0622%17 Jul →
ancient13–50.0323%17 Jul →
anubis13–10.0219%17 Jul →
inferno13–100.0330%17 Jul →
inferno16–19-0.0414%16 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0630%16 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0321%15 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0719%15 Jul →
mirage13–70.0122%14 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0223%14 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0814%14 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0221%14 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0132%8 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0427%8 Jul →
inferno13–2-0.0624%7 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0122%7 Jul →
inferno9–3-0.018%4 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0339%1 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0828%29 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0024%29 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0519%29 Jun →
mirage9–130.0026%29 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0212%29 Jun →
inferno13–160.0220%29 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0821%28 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.085%28 Jun →
mirage12–12-0.0323%28 Jun →
dust213–50.0712%28 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0319%25 Jun →
ancient9–0-0.0627%25 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0336%25 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0325%24 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0722%24 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0721%24 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0414%24 Jun →
nuke13–4-0.0122%24 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0927%23 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0215%23 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0918%23 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0421%23 Jun →
mirage13–30.0315%23 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0626%23 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0224%23 Jun →
nuke13–3-0.1115%22 Jun →
dust214–16-0.0216%22 Jun →
mirage13–10.0644%21 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0332%20 Jun →
inferno13–50.0433%20 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0221%20 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0125%18 Jun →
mirage13–40.0214%18 Jun →
dust213–10.1120%18 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0630%18 Jun →
ancient12–12-0.0218%18 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.1022%17 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.0418%16 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0417%16 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0928%16 Jun →
dust216–130.0520%9 Jun →
ancient13–80.1712%6 Jun →
inferno13–10.1533%6 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0115%4 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0124%31 May →
ancient13–90.0816%30 May →
inferno7–13-0.0838%30 May →
dust213–80.0819%30 May →
anubis12–12-0.0215%30 May →
mirage13–00.0546%29 May →
inferno1–13-0.0234%29 May →
mirage13–3-0.0018%24 May →
nuke11–13-0.0313%12 May →
anubis13–6-0.0228%12 May →
ancient11–13-0.0219%12 May →
mirage11–130.0223%12 May →
mirage11–60.0124%10 May →
inferno12–16-0.0121%8 May →
anubis10–13-0.047%8 May →
mirage13–110.0116%7 May →
anubis13–6-0.0319%1 May →
overpass11–13-0.0215%1 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.