✪ Old Man ✪

✪ Old Man ✪ — CS2 Stats

US76561198361413968[U:1:401148240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,715Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,430Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,488Purple band · top ~18.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,150 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+81Premier CS Rating · 17,407 → 17,488

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,488 +54 3 Sept – 17 Oct · 25 days played
15,00018,132peak 18,1323 Sept17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,150 +0 3 Sept – 22 Sept · 4 observations
1,1501,150peak 1,1503 Sept22 Sept
18,239Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,150Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,150
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 51 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 644 below peak (18,132)
  • +2,192 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,512 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches144——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.98——
Headshot %38%——

Measured 17 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,934), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate38.7%43.7%44.8%6.1% short
Shot accuracy7.8%12.0%12.4%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.021.03meets
Match win rate39.0%44.7%45.2%6.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ Old Man ✪FACEITLevel 5 · 1,150 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,488 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,150csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning40
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateLWLWWLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.9 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility8.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch4.2

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.0
Utility8.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time531ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 11 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · office, 19 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · office, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2412–1250%-0.00
infernoA1911–858%-0.00
mirageD184–1422%-0.01
ancientS96–367%-0.00
anubisA85–363%-0.02
cacheA85–363%-0.01
nuke—42–250%-0.01
train—41–325%0.02
vertigo—31–233%-0.02
office—20–20%0.00
debris—10–10%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

134,691Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7,617Matches
39.0%Match win rate
38.7%Headshot %
7.8%Shot accuracy
10,716MVPs
2,430Hours (in match)
6,226Bombs planted
1,304Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,852
MP96,572
AWP6,086
FAMAS5,634
MAC-103,868

Lifetime map wins

13,886dust2
9,699inferno
3,874nuke
3,355vertigo
1,643train
305office
262ar_shoots
141ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

552Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
77.4ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10654%0.9713.9
Ancient3850%0.9214.9
Dust23765%1.0213.8
Inferno2952%1.0913.9
Anubis2752%0.9313.7
Nuke2544%0.8514.2
Vertigo1937%0.8313.5
Overpass633%1.0314.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.8%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
537msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.90HE damage / grenade
16.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.7687% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5899% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.062%17 Oct →
ancient13–80.0014%17 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0516%16 Oct →
cache13–8-0.067%16 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0314%15 Oct →
inferno9–130.0210%15 Oct →
mirage12–120.0112%14 Oct →
inferno13–100.009%14 Oct →
ancient6–130.0019%13 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0424%13 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0510%13 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0111%11 Oct →
cache13–90.007%11 Oct →
inferno13–00.0215%11 Oct →
mirage9–130.0011%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0112%11 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.066%11 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0211%11 Oct →
dust213–50.1815%11 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0513%11 Oct →
mirage9–130.0514%11 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0417%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.069%11 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0719%11 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0112%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.018%10 Oct →
train11–13-0.036%9 Oct →
train10–13-0.017%9 Oct →
inferno13–60.0114%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.017%7 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0116%7 Oct →
dust213–1-0.0125%7 Oct →
office12–12-0.0313%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.099%4 Oct →
dust212–12-0.039%4 Oct →
cache13–5-0.025%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.016%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.015%3 Oct →
dust26–130.0612%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0013%3 Oct →
inferno12–120.0115%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0516%3 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0313%3 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.048%3 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0215%2 Oct →
dust210–130.048%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.048%1 Oct →
dust213–1-0.0117%1 Oct →
dust26–1-0.070%1 Oct →
train13–40.1621%1 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0112%1 Oct →
inferno8–130.0115%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0010%1 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.1014%30 Sept →
ancient13–80.0715%29 Sept →
dust213–20.109%29 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0616%29 Sept →
train8–13-0.0510%29 Sept →
dust213–50.067%29 Sept →
inferno13–110.0313%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0010%28 Sept →
ancient8–20.0224%28 Sept →
nuke13–50.037%28 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.036%27 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0115%27 Sept →
inferno9–130.0518%27 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.019%27 Sept →
cache13–40.0810%27 Sept →
inferno13–10.0611%27 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0316%27 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0514%26 Sept →
inferno13–70.0715%26 Sept →
dust24–13-0.017%26 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0023%23 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0211%23 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0619%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.0714%22 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0517%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0215%22 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0621%22 Sept →
dust23–10-0.069%21 Sept →
anubis13–80.0623%21 Sept →
office1–130.0429%19 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0211%19 Sept →
mirage9–130.0217%18 Sept →
ancient13–90.0118%18 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0815%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.017%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0811%16 Sept →
inferno13–40.0317%16 Sept →
debris3–9-0.137%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0416%15 Sept →
cache13–20.0015%15 Sept →
dust27–130.0211%15 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.036%15 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0913%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0511%15 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0111%15 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0516%14 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.107%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.