touchpad tor — CS2 Stats

NO76561198355415643[U:1:395149915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,017Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,140Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,668Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17398 of 37067 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 869 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	52.3%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	8.2%	12.3%	13.1%	4.9% short
Kill/death ratio	0.99	1.07	1.08	0.09 short
Match win rate	43.3%	46.3%	46.9%	3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning48

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–55–3Last 10042%Win rateWTWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression6.2

Utility5.2

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning4.8

Utility5.2

Mechanics9.4

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time645ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms

Headshot accuracy25.3%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–5

13–2Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 9% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	22	11–11	50%	-0.01
ancient	D	18	6–12	33%	0.01
cache	S	16	11–5	69%	0.02
nuke	C	14	6–8	43%	0.00
dust2	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.01
anubis	D	11	1–10	9%	-0.02
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,229Lifetime kills

0.99K/D

2,055Matches

43.3%Match win rate

52.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players

8.2%Shot accuracy

3,839MVPs

741Hours (in match)

2,015Bombs planted

555Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,530

M4A4 / M4A1-S6,079

Desert Eagle5,876

AWP4,458

P2000 / USP-S2,417

Glock-181,399

SSG 08917

P250397

FAMAS396

Knife365

Lifetime map wins

1,668dust2

1,518nuke

1,016inferno

656vertigo

303train

77office

52cbble

24italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

304Matches

51%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

78.5ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	85	54%	1.06	16.5
Ancient	46	57%	1.18	17.0
Anubis	42	40%	1.09	15.4
Nuke	40	42%	1.00	14.1
Cache	34	62%	1.26	17.2
Dust2	29	52%	0.99	17.2
Inferno	14	43%	1.02	14.1
Overpass	5	60%	0.89	16.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.8%Spray accuracy

92.1%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

613msReaction time

37.0%T opening success

40.6%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

8.74HE damage / grenade

8.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.9836% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–7	-0.02	21%	23 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.01	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	26%	21 Aug →
ancient	1–7	-0.08	14%	14 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	48%	13 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	40%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	17%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.06	29%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.10	21%	12 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.03	25%	12 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.08	13%	12 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	9%	12 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	15%	11 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	30%	11 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.01	27%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	21%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	26%	11 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	35%	11 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	31%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.14	21%	11 Aug →
nuke	1–9	-0.15	33%	10 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.00	46%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	35%	9 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	20%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	19%	8 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.00	35%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	20%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	15%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	22%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	25%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	29%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.01	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	26%	2 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.03	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.02	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	38%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	42%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.09	9%	1 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	10%	1 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.14	24%	1 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	19%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	13%	1 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	23%	1 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	20%	1 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	17%	1 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	28%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	21%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	29%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	26%	26 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	30%	25 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	32%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	44%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	30%	25 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	25%	25 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.01	33%	25 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.03	45%	25 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.15	45%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	35%	25 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.06	19%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	22%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.05	26%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.08	20%	25 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.02	22%	25 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	18%	25 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.00	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.05	28%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.00	32%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	39%	25 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.03	7%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	25%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.08	17%	24 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	26%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	28%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	30%	23 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	12%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	29%	23 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.13	13%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.12	31%	23 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.02	6%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	23%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	15%	23 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.00	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	15%	22 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	39%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	31%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	15%	18 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.04	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	27%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.06	12%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	21%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	15%	17 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	19%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	30%	17 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.02	38%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	20%	17 Jul →