Snacc Racc

Snacc Racc — CS2 Stats

US76561198354353755[U:1:394088027]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,325Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,389Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79778 of 251178 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,203 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +282 23 Aug – 9 Oct · 23 days played
18,94320,702peak 20,70223 Aug9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,203 +0 1 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations
2,2032,203peak 2,2031 Sept20 Sept
20,702Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,203Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,203
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 297 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 702 below peak (20,702)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches86——
Win rate44%——
K/D0.94——
Headshot %57%——

Measured 7 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.9%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy11.5%13.0%13.3%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.061.07above
Match win rate42.0%46.3%46.9%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnacc RaccFACEITLevel 8 · 2,203 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,203csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning48
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time617ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 3 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 3 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · poseidon, 3 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2010–1050%-0.01
mirageD186–1233%0.01
dust2B158–753%-0.01
cacheB126–650%0.02
infernoA117–464%0.02
ancientB105–550%-0.01
anubisC52–340%0.00
vertigo—41–325%0.03
poseidon—22–0100%-0.01
debris—11–0100%0.00
overpass—10–10%0.00
office—10–10%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

176,988Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8,853Matches
42.0%Match win rate
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
11.5%Shot accuracy
21,681MVPs
2,823Hours (in match)
8,215Bombs planted
2,058Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4753,626
AWP15,293
MP95,090
FAMAS4,002
MAC-103,677

Lifetime map wins

16,626dust2
10,037inferno
4,781nuke
4,461vertigo
2,434train
615cbble
477lake
179office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

781Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
72.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19753%0.9413.9
Dust214649%0.9415.1
Anubis9445%0.9413.6
Inferno8956%1.0215.7
Ancient7645%1.0015.6
Nuke5351%1.0214.8
Train2167%1.1414.5
Cache1450%0.8514.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
610msReaction time
47.4%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
7.72HE damage / grenade
11.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.6998% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0127%9 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0322%9 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0123%9 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0221%9 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1012%9 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.1526%8 Oct →
cache13–70.0413%7 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0715%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0123%2 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0122%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0440%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0329%2 Oct →
nuke13–70.0416%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0212%1 Oct →
poseidon9–7-0.0615%1 Oct →
cache5–130.0329%30 Sept →
anubis13–110.0316%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0132%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0325%30 Sept →
vertigo9–60.0826%29 Sept →
debris9–40.0021%29 Sept →
mirage10–130.0325%27 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0715%27 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0124%27 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0921%27 Sept →
overpass5–90.0010%27 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0217%26 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0325%26 Sept →
inferno13–30.029%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0421%26 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0425%26 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0122%26 Sept →
vertigo5–9-0.0625%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0031%18 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0613%17 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0727%17 Sept →
nuke11–130.0823%17 Sept →
cache10–130.0325%17 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0144%17 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0819%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0522%17 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0523%10 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0518%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.039%10 Sept →
mirage6–130.0118%9 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0230%7 Sept →
inferno13–20.0237%6 Sept →
mirage13–20.1226%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0020%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0115%5 Sept →
dust213–20.0921%5 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0029%5 Sept →
mirage9–130.0218%5 Sept →
nuke13–20.0216%5 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0015%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0519%4 Sept →
nuke9–130.0216%4 Sept →
mirage13–90.0818%4 Sept →
cache13–70.1018%4 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0327%3 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0332%3 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0116%3 Sept →
inferno9–60.0626%3 Sept →
inferno9–00.2347%3 Sept →
poseidon9–60.0323%3 Sept →
dust213–40.0030%2 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0234%2 Sept →
nuke13–100.0325%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0731%2 Sept →
ancient13–40.0341%1 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0622%1 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0114%1 Sept →
cache13–90.0137%1 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0323%26 Aug →
cache11–130.0729%25 Aug →
anubis7–130.0331%25 Aug →
ancient10–40.0122%25 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0417%25 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.0215%24 Aug →
office5–13-0.105%24 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0716%24 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0415%24 Aug →
nuke13–40.1019%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0416%23 Aug →
nuke9–7-0.0118%23 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0126%22 Aug →
mirage13–40.0127%22 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0023%22 Aug →
mirage9–130.0416%22 Aug →
dust216–130.0326%18 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0522%18 Aug →
dust211–130.0520%18 Aug →
mirage13–1-0.0116%18 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0318%18 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0124%18 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0022%18 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0129%18 Aug →
anubis13–30.0420%18 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0133%18 Aug →
inferno13–40.0126%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.