NotCle@r

NotCle@r — CS2 Stats

IM76561198349234895[U:1:388969167]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,413Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,423Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,508Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50680 of 261544 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,508 +1,653 17 Sept – 13 Nov · 28 days played
20,85523,760peak 23,76017 Sept13 Nov
23,986Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,252 below peak (23,760)
  • +772 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,492 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate35.0%45.7%46.8%11.8% short
Shot accuracy9.9%12.7%13.0%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.051.06above
Match win rate45.6%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNotCle@rFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,508 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning62
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 451ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time477ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 497ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 11 Nov →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 13 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 21 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D247–1729%0.01
cacheA2214–864%0.01
infernoA1810–856%0.00
anubisD133–1023%0.01
mirageS107–370%-0.01
ancientB63–350%-0.01
nukeS54–180%0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.04
debris—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,537Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3,751Matches
45.6%Match win rate
35.0%Headshot %
9.9%Shot accuracy
9,349MVPs
1,423Hours (in match)
3,019Bombs planted
898Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,033
AWP13,556
P2501,627
P901,604
MP71,520
SSG 081,359

Lifetime map wins

8,764dust2
6,851inferno
1,949nuke
602cbble
379vertigo
353train
240office
140lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
75.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno425%0.7713.5
Cache367%1.4015.7
Anubis2100%1.7019.5
Ancient20%0.7415.5
Mirage1100%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
474msReaction time
64.4%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
9.80HE damage / grenade
8.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4972 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.013%13 Nov →
cache16–140.0222%13 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0519%13 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0043%13 Nov →
ancient13–8-0.0211%13 Nov →
inferno7–130.0117%13 Nov →
inferno13–70.0113%12 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0311%12 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.0213%12 Nov →
inferno13–80.0917%12 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0117%12 Nov →
dust29–130.0616%11 Nov →
anubis13–90.1217%11 Nov →
cache8–130.0519%11 Nov →
dust215–150.0121%10 Nov →
ancient0–13-0.053%10 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.059%10 Nov →
dust213–10.0815%9 Nov →
dust213–70.0315%9 Nov →
poseidon3–9-0.0426%9 Nov →
debris9–70.0621%9 Nov →
nuke13–80.0712%9 Nov →
cache13–110.0118%8 Nov →
cache2–13-0.0122%8 Nov →
anubis13–100.0416%8 Nov →
cache13–9-0.002%8 Nov →
dust26–130.0211%8 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0318%7 Nov →
cache6–13-0.048%4 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0123%4 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0516%4 Nov →
cache16–120.0710%4 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.019%3 Nov →
dust215–15-0.018%3 Nov →
inferno13–50.0310%3 Nov →
cache11–130.0312%2 Nov →
nuke16–130.0220%2 Nov →
cache13–80.0011%2 Nov →
ancient15–15-0.0410%2 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0114%2 Nov →
dust29–130.0320%2 Nov →
dust213–80.0926%2 Nov →
cache13–10-0.0221%31 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0813%31 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0318%31 Oct →
mirage13–20.0926%31 Oct →
cache10–130.0213%30 Oct →
cache13–70.018%30 Oct →
cache13–6-0.032%30 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0325%30 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0614%30 Oct →
inferno4–130.0012%30 Oct →
cache13–80.0910%29 Oct →
inferno13–60.048%29 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.1016%29 Oct →
ancient3–130.0115%29 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.058%29 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0515%28 Oct →
anubis7–130.029%28 Oct →
dust211–130.029%28 Oct →
inferno14–160.0510%27 Oct →
inferno3–90.0322%27 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0415%26 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0610%26 Oct →
mirage13–40.029%26 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0524%26 Oct →
dust29–130.0817%26 Oct →
ancient16–120.0010%24 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.038%24 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0110%24 Oct →
dust213–70.0516%24 Oct →
cache13–100.0422%24 Oct →
dust28–130.036%24 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0112%23 Oct →
inferno13–40.0310%23 Oct →
nuke13–70.0318%23 Oct →
dust27–130.0320%22 Oct →
anubis9–130.0918%22 Oct →
cache13–20.008%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0122%22 Oct →
inferno7–130.0210%21 Oct →
ancient13–30.039%21 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0215%21 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0512%21 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0411%21 Oct →
anubis15–150.0120%20 Oct →
mirage16–130.0113%20 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0414%20 Oct →
anubis10–130.0210%19 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0214%19 Oct →
cache5–13-0.044%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0316%19 Oct →
anubis13–20.052%19 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0612%19 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0111%18 Oct →
mirage13–80.0011%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.017%17 Oct →
cache13–6-0.039%15 Oct →
cache13–110.038%15 Oct →
anubis9–130.0211%14 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.