MagGIe_lI

MagGIe_lI — CS2 Stats

US76561198348258138[U:1:387992410]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,647Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,450Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,396Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,396 -2,039 1 Oct – 4 Nov · 21 days played
16,23519,435peak 19,4351 Oct4 Nov
19,547Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,039 below peak (19,435)
  • -351 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,604 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.9%45.7%46.8%3.9% short
Shot accuracy15.4%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.761.051.060.30 short
Match win rate48.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMagGIe_lIFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,396 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning36
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–50–7Last 10043%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −65ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility2.9
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 35% on T to 12% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.6
Utility2.9
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time591ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy12.8%−7.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 12 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 27 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 28 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 14anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2612–1446%-0.02
dust2B2211–1150%-0.03
infernoC145–936%-0.01
ancientA148–657%-0.02
nukeC104–640%-0.03
cacheD92–722%-0.04
anubisD51–420%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,614Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
4,515Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
42.9%Headshot %
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,527MVPs
2,170Hours (in match)
5,845Bombs planted
1,150Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,523
XM10145,443
AWP2,894
MAC-101,914
MP91,783

Lifetime map wins

13,929inferno
6,960dust2
2,868nuke
1,640vertigo
627train
418lake
199cbble
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
589msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
11.6%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
5.62HE damage / grenade
5.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6207% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3654 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1575% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0513%4 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.127%31 Oct →
cache13–80.0019%31 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0316%31 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0117%31 Oct →
cache0–13-0.084%28 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0211%28 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0432%28 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.035%28 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.036%24 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.038%24 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0314%22 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0529%20 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.1012%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.087%19 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0911%19 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.073%18 Oct →
dust213–3-0.026%17 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0416%17 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0211%17 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.009%16 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0519%16 Oct →
dust213–30.0422%15 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0512%15 Oct →
cache15–15-0.082%14 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.060%14 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0524%14 Oct →
ancient13–40.0219%14 Oct →
mirage11–130.0118%13 Oct →
inferno13–40.0214%13 Oct →
inferno9–30.1112%12 Oct →
inferno13–100.0317%11 Oct →
cache10–130.0112%11 Oct →
nuke10–130.0110%11 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0916%9 Oct →
cache2–13-0.066%9 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0213%8 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0118%8 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0811%8 Oct →
mirage13–70.0720%8 Oct →
mirage10–130.0318%6 Oct →
dust213–70.0714%6 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0511%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0014%6 Oct →
ancient13–60.0716%5 Oct →
mirage13–70.007%5 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.090%4 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.040%4 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.126%3 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0419%3 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0721%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0719%2 Oct →
inferno9–130.0216%2 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0211%2 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0324%1 Oct →
inferno13–60.0614%1 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0112%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.036%30 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0522%30 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0619%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0611%29 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.066%29 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0611%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0314%28 Sept →
nuke13–50.0326%28 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.016%28 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0515%28 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0216%27 Sept →
dust21–13-0.07100%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0115%27 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.074%26 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0129%26 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0529%25 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0638%24 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0515%24 Sept →
mirage5–130.0619%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.023%23 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0417%23 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0010%23 Sept →
mirage12–120.0616%23 Sept →
dust213–11-0.027%21 Sept →
ancient13–50.0114%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0227%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0532%19 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0626%19 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0721%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0626%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.1024%18 Sept →
ancient13–80.0520%13 Sept →
dust212–12-0.055%13 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.063%13 Sept →
dust27–20.0211%12 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0219%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0932%12 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0220%12 Sept →
inferno6–130.0310%11 Sept →
ancient13–80.0230%11 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0612%11 Sept →
dust213–80.0316%6 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.069%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.