bimbam

bimbam — CS2 Stats

76561198346515587[U:1:386249859]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

849Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,259 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbimbamFACEITLevel 10 · 2,259 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning56
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateLWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility3.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.6
Utility3.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time582ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 19 Dec
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 5 Oct
344msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 17 Jan
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA29161355%-0.00
mirageB189950%0.01
nukeB147750%0.01
vertigoA85363%0.01
anubisC83538%0.02
infernoS76186%-0.01
overpassA74357%0.02
cache42250%-0.00
dust243175%0.00
italy1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,069Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient17857%1.0315.7
Mirage11250%1.0114.5
Inferno10047%1.0716.6
Nuke6356%1.0715.9
Anubis5054%1.0516.4
Vertigo4965%1.1216.6
Overpass2938%0.9815.0
Train2770%1.0716.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
573msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.55HE damage / grenade
2.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.4871 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0175% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo11–130.0321%6 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0220%6 Sept
ancient13–4-0.039%6 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0239%6 Sept
anubis5–130.0335%6 Sept
vertigo13–50.0319%6 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0221%6 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0610%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0420%30 Aug
ancient13–50.0319%23 Aug
vertigo13–60.0428%23 Aug
cache6–13-0.0123%23 Aug
vertigo13–80.0113%23 Aug
vertigo16–19-0.0421%23 Aug
cache10–130.0020%2 Aug
anubis13–20.1025%9 Jul
cache13–10-0.0114%9 Jul
mirage13–110.0325%9 Jul
anubis13–50.0616%9 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0426%9 Jul
cache13–3-0.0014%8 Jul
ancient6–130.0216%8 Jul
anubis7–13-0.046%7 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0215%7 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0132%7 Jul
anubis13–110.0424%14 May
mirage11–130.0113%14 May
inferno13–50.0224%14 May
inferno13–7-0.0217%3 May
ancient13–50.0327%3 May
ancient13–9-0.0815%3 May
inferno13–50.0411%3 May
mirage13–9-0.0238%1 Apr
mirage3–130.0520%8 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0419%15 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0223%15 Feb
dust213–10-0.0314%14 Feb
nuke13–160.0115%14 Feb
mirage19–160.0215%7 Feb
mirage13–110.0117%3 Feb
mirage10–130.0322%25 Jan
ancient1–130.0523%25 Jan
dust213–8-0.0215%23 Jan
dust29–13-0.0136%22 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0216%18 Jan
mirage13–40.0112%18 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0526%18 Jan
ancient13–70.1040%18 Jan
anubis12–160.0311%17 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0615%17 Jan
nuke13–5-0.0226%10 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0128%9 Jan
overpass13–60.0723%9 Jan
italy5–130.1031%9 Jan
nuke13–30.0822%9 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0213%27 Dec
mirage10–130.0112%27 Dec
ancient13–30.0118%27 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0120%27 Dec
overpass16–140.008%27 Dec
vertigo13–70.0427%22 Dec
ancient13–50.1238%22 Dec
nuke13–80.0614%21 Dec
overpass13–70.0824%21 Dec
mirage11–130.0123%21 Dec
ancient13–5-0.0429%21 Dec
inferno14–16-0.0125%21 Dec
ancient13–70.0117%21 Dec
ancient13–80.0320%21 Dec
nuke13–100.0015%21 Dec
vertigo11–130.0225%20 Dec
ancient13–100.0424%20 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0318%20 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0417%19 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0211%19 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0128%19 Dec
nuke13–40.1321%19 Dec
ancient13–110.0523%19 Dec
mirage9–130.0128%9 Dec
overpass7–13-0.0312%8 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0113%7 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0417%7 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0521%7 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0110%29 Nov
ancient13–90.0620%29 Nov
mirage2–130.0023%26 Oct
mirage13–90.0523%6 Oct
ancient7–13-0.0416%5 Oct
ancient13–6-0.0643%5 Oct
nuke17–19-0.0424%4 Oct
nuke19–170.0021%28 Sept
inferno13–60.0014%28 Sept
overpass16–14-0.0132%28 Sept
dust213–110.0727%27 Sept
mirage16–140.0418%27 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0615%21 Sept
overpass10–13-0.0122%21 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0330%21 Sept
nuke13–100.0022%20 Sept
overpass7–130.0122%31 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →