Shitbacon

Shitbacon — CS2 Stats

FI76561198112068135[U:1:151802407]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,083Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,731 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,731 → 1,731
+45Tracked matches · now 2,083
−13.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 17 days played since 1 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,731 +0 1 Sept12 Sept · 2 observations
1,7311,731peak 1,7311 Sept12 Sept
1,731Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
17Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,731
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShitbaconFACEITLevel 8 · 1,731 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,731csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning66
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4951Last 10049%Win rateLLWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.1
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time538ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 7 Sept
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 7 Sept
367msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 11 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
916In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB28141450%0.01
anubisC2181338%-0.02
mirageC1971237%-0.02
cacheB115645%0.00
infernoS108280%0.00
vertigoB63350%0.01
nuke43175%0.02
dust2110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,131Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
72.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient26054%0.9913.8
Mirage19548%0.9313.9
Inferno18752%0.9313.9
Anubis12043%0.8913.8
Nuke9951%0.9314.9
Vertigo5366%0.9213.0
Train3954%0.8813.3
Dust23845%0.8112.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
540msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
52.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
13.18HE damage / grenade
8.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0947% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0511%20 Sept
vertigo10–130.0117%19 Sept
ancient13–110.0614%19 Sept
anubis11–13-0.048%19 Sept
cache10–13-0.0213%19 Sept
cache17–190.0823%18 Sept
ancient13–90.0412%18 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0518%18 Sept
anubis8–13-0.058%18 Sept
nuke17–19-0.0120%18 Sept
cache13–60.0519%18 Sept
inferno11–130.017%18 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0222%17 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0710%17 Sept
inferno13–60.0232%17 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0522%17 Sept
anubis10–130.0212%17 Sept
cache11–13-0.0410%17 Sept
anubis13–90.0019%17 Sept
cache13–80.0710%16 Sept
nuke13–40.0914%16 Sept
ancient3–13-0.046%16 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0225%16 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0416%16 Sept
ancient16–140.027%16 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0219%15 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0014%15 Sept
anubis13–80.0027%15 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0210%15 Sept
inferno13–70.0224%15 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0517%14 Sept
ancient13–20.0827%14 Sept
mirage13–100.0113%14 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0324%14 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0217%13 Sept
cache6–13-0.0512%13 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0814%13 Sept
inferno19–17-0.0022%12 Sept
inferno19–160.0213%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0120%12 Sept
cache13–7-0.0116%12 Sept
mirage13–30.0311%12 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0826%12 Sept
ancient11–130.0122%11 Sept
ancient3–130.0515%11 Sept
anubis7–13-0.078%11 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0119%11 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0230%11 Sept
inferno13–60.0421%11 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0424%11 Sept
cache13–8-0.0530%10 Sept
anubis13–110.0513%10 Sept
anubis13–110.0224%10 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0816%10 Sept
inferno13–80.008%10 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0218%10 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0822%10 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0020%8 Sept
inferno13–80.0221%8 Sept
nuke13–100.0318%7 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0026%7 Sept
mirage13–20.0632%7 Sept
ancient5–13-0.009%7 Sept
ancient13–60.1814%7 Sept
vertigo11–130.0120%6 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0124%6 Sept
ancient13–40.0017%6 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0519%6 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0510%6 Sept
vertigo13–50.0823%6 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0010%6 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0629%6 Sept
anubis22–250.0211%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0226%6 Sept
cache4–13-0.0517%6 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0511%6 Sept
vertigo13–40.0517%5 Sept
ancient13–70.0115%5 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0513%5 Sept
cache13–60.0020%5 Sept
ancient13–70.019%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0412%5 Sept
ancient13–00.0518%5 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0516%5 Sept
anubis13–30.0119%5 Sept
ancient13–50.0920%5 Sept
ancient13–50.0727%4 Sept
mirage11–130.0111%4 Sept
cache11–130.0118%4 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0515%4 Sept
anubis11–130.0114%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0014%3 Sept
anubis7–13-0.105%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0115%3 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0916%3 Sept
ancient13–30.0013%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0617%3 Sept
mirage10–130.0329%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0215%3 Sept
ancient13–30.057%3 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →