Gamla Hosuja

Gamla Hosuja — CS2 Stats

FI76561198070273248[U:1:110007520]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,981Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,234Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,620 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,620 → 1,620
+58Tracked matches · now 2,981
−3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 50.0%

Rating over time

1,620Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,620
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches97——
Win rate54%——
K/D0.69——
Headshot %37%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate34.7%46.8%48.2%13.6% short
Shot accuracy10.3%13.0%13.3%3.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.801.061.070.28 short
Match win rate40.9%46.3%46.9%6.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGamla HosujaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,620 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,620csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning59
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateLWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility6.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time537ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 529ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 5 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · poseidon, 5 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 4 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 24anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2415–963%-0.01
infernoB179–853%-0.02
vertigoA169–756%-0.02
cacheB158–753%-0.03
mirageA127–558%-0.02
anubisB115–645%-0.02
dust2—21–150%-0.04
nuke—22–0100%-0.02
poseidon—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,404Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
5,954Matches
40.9%Match win rate
34.7%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy
11,699MVPs
10,711Hours (in match)
6,570Bombs planted
1,589Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,694
AWP20,630
Knife1,864
MP91,725
MAC-101,697

Lifetime map wins

15,412inferno
7,718vertigo
3,614nuke
2,298dust2
2,242train
183lake
124cbble
105bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,819Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
63.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient37154%0.8712.3
Inferno24851%0.8412.5
Mirage23947%0.7811.7
Vertigo16561%0.9113.2
Anubis13846%0.8112.5
Nuke10744%0.7611.8
Overpass5746%0.7711.4
Dust24445%0.8212.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
12.7°Preaim
538msReaction time
42.8%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
7.63HE damage / grenade
13.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7004° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.5369% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0117%11 Oct →
vertigo16–13-0.064%10 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0510%10 Oct →
vertigo13–7-0.036%10 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.027%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0610%10 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.018%10 Oct →
inferno15–19-0.0112%10 Oct →
vertigo14–16-0.0116%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.063%10 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0515%10 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.028%10 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.058%6 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0519%5 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.046%4 Oct →
ancient16–140.007%3 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.1019%3 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.039%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.0420%24 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0319%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.0437%20 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0314%20 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0115%19 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.049%19 Sept →
nuke13–40.038%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0613%16 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0511%13 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0116%13 Sept →
inferno19–17-0.0220%12 Sept →
inferno19–16-0.0513%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.019%12 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0219%12 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.012%12 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0011%12 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.076%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0314%7 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0314%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0410%6 Sept →
ancient13–40.0211%6 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0511%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.1025%6 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0220%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.045%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0114%6 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.079%6 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0416%6 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.087%5 Sept →
ancient13–70.0215%5 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0013%5 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0418%5 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.019%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0121%5 Sept →
ancient13–00.0610%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0112%5 Sept →
poseidon9–40.0144%5 Sept →
anubis13–30.0418%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0115%5 Sept →
vertigo16–12-0.007%30 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0210%30 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0510%30 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.053%23 Aug →
vertigo13–60.0110%23 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0320%23 Aug →
vertigo13–8-0.0119%23 Aug →
vertigo16–19-0.0310%23 Aug →
cache16–14-0.038%23 Aug →
cache13–20.0612%23 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0212%23 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0014%23 Aug →
ancient20–22-0.0014%23 Aug →
vertigo22–18-0.0313%22 Aug →
ancient13–00.059%21 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0415%21 Aug →
anubis9–130.0113%19 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0918%18 Aug →
mirage13–40.058%18 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0016%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0322%18 Aug →
ancient19–150.019%18 Aug →
anubis13–70.0111%18 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0110%17 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0516%17 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0113%17 Aug →
vertigo7–13-0.0427%17 Aug →
cache8–13-0.056%17 Aug →
ancient13–90.0223%17 Aug →
vertigo9–13-0.0113%17 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0712%17 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0222%13 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0414%11 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0121%9 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0427%9 Aug →
ancient13–80.024%2 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0814%2 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.068%26 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0011%26 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0313%25 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0412%25 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0222%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.