Derwbs

Derwbs — CS2 Stats

LV76561198343284308[U:1:383018580]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,321Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,431Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,268 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (45 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,268 → 1,268
+3Tracked matches · now 2,321
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,524 -448 16 May – 15 Sept · 15 days played
14,01319,090peak 19,09016 May15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,268 +0 1 Sept – 15 Sept · 2 observations
1,2681,268peak 1,2681 Sept15 Sept
19,427Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,268Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-05-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,268
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 83 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.7%43.8%44.8%4.1% short
Shot accuracy15.4%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.811.021.030.22 short
Match win rate44.9%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDerwbsFACEITLevel 5 · 1,268 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,268csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning39
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility3.0
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.8

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.9
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time609ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 14 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 6 Jul →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 29 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

13Longest win streak
L5Current streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 12dust2Weakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C249–1538%-0.03
ancientB209–1145%-0.04
mirageB158–753%-0.01
infernoB137–654%-0.05
cacheA127–558%-0.02
anubisB105–550%-0.04
nuke—41–325%-0.03
overpass—21–150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,297Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
5,496Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
40.7%Headshot %
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9,746MVPs
2,431Hours (in match)
3,908Bombs planted
1,060Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,609
AWP6,270
MP93,428
MAC-102,924
FAMAS2,498

Lifetime map wins

12,605inferno
7,360dust2
2,755train
2,237nuke
1,430vertigo
861cbble
209office
105lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

858Matches
50%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
69.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10550%0.8613.2
Ancient7749%0.8513.7
Dust27250%0.8413.8
Inferno5954%0.7812.6
Anubis3834%0.6911.4
Cache1844%0.8713.8
Nuke1638%1.0015.8
Vertigo1060%0.679.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
615msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
24.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
3.82HE damage / grenade
1.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.9918 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0495% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0118%20 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0214%6 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0331%6 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0915%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0238%6 Sept →
dust213–40.0317%29 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0311%29 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0616%29 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0820%23 Aug →
mirage13–20.0213%23 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0120%22 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0317%22 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0114%22 Aug →
dust211–130.0130%22 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0514%21 Aug →
dust213–70.0317%20 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.117%20 Aug →
cache13–70.0316%20 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0413%18 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0514%16 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.037%16 Aug →
cache13–8-0.059%16 Aug →
dust213–30.0931%14 Aug →
dust213–50.0111%11 Aug →
mirage13–90.0027%11 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0321%11 Aug →
ancient22–19-0.0314%9 Aug →
mirage13–80.0516%7 Aug →
mirage13–20.048%2 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0416%2 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0618%24 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.067%24 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.045%24 Jul →
anubis16–13-0.047%23 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0116%23 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0115%23 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0717%23 Jul →
dust213–10-0.1210%22 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0931%22 Jul →
overpass13–3-0.0126%22 Jul →
nuke13–00.000%22 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0415%21 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0315%21 Jul →
cache16–130.0323%21 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0921%21 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0219%21 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0318%20 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0311%20 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0517%17 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0717%16 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0623%16 Jul →
cache11–130.0314%11 Jul →
inferno13–70.0120%10 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0212%10 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0316%10 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0317%10 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0329%9 Jul →
dust28–130.0318%8 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.10100%6 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0520%6 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0611%6 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0220%3 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.048%3 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0135%3 Jul →
inferno13–30.0313%3 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0826%3 Jul →
inferno4–9-0.1114%3 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0721%26 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0714%26 Jun →
anubis16–12-0.0819%26 Jun →
dust26–13-0.1121%26 Jun →
mirage10–130.0619%26 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0711%22 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0818%22 Jun →
dust26–13-0.118%22 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0324%13 Jun →
dust26–130.0020%13 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0014%12 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0418%12 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0114%28 May →
ancient10–13-0.0520%26 May →
dust22–13-0.167%26 May →
inferno9–13-0.0117%26 May →
ancient16–14-0.0512%25 May →
anubis10–13-0.0121%25 May →
mirage13–8-0.0422%25 May →
dust212–160.029%23 May →
ancient13–10-0.0621%23 May →
anubis3–13-0.0318%23 May →
cache7–13-0.0220%23 May →
nuke11–13-0.0331%22 May →
inferno13–11-0.0213%22 May →
dust29–30.0229%22 May →
nuke5–13-0.0512%22 May →
inferno3–13-0.0719%22 May →
mirage15–150.0318%19 May →
ancient13–8-0.0121%17 May →
anubis13–80.008%16 May →
mirage9–13-0.0219%16 May →
overpass11–13-0.0617%16 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.