Pralka

Pralka — CS2 Stats

PL76561198328078493[U:1:367812765]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,444Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,829Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,631Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,642 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,444 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,631 +1,081 3 Jun4 Sept · 18 days played
16,46617,860peak 17,8603 Jun4 Sept
18,146Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,642Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-05-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,642
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 229 below peak (17,860)
  • -19 over 30 days · steady
  • -159 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,369 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.7%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy11.1%12.0%12.4%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.811.021.040.23 short
Match win rate38.4%44.7%45.3%6.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPralkaFACEITLevel 5 · 1,642 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,631 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,642csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning42
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42562Last 10042%Win rateLLWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 690ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility3.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.2
Utility3.5
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time650ms+37ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 26 Jun
59%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · inferno, 3 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · inferno, 30 May
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 18 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2391439%-0.04
mirageC2181338%-0.03
ancientC1771041%-0.01
cacheA127558%-0.04
nukeC104640%-0.04
dust2C83538%-0.01
overpass41325%-0.02
anubis32167%-0.03
vertigo21150%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,154Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
5,456Matches
38.4%Match win rate
45.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
11.1%Shot accuracy
10,683MVPs
1,829Hours (in match)
2,365Bombs planted
733Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,805
AWP7,858
MP92,067
P901,913
MAC-101,763

Lifetime map wins

5,610inferno
4,860dust2
2,342nuke
1,209vertigo
847cbble
294train
271office
234lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

773Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
84.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26554%0.9716.1
Ancient15651%0.9917.2
Dust210651%0.9415.2
Anubis8042%0.8514.6
Nuke5250%0.9516.6
Inferno4452%0.9615.8
Cache2952%1.1520.7
Overpass1735%0.9017.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
649msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
6.59HE damage / grenade
2.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4488 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7818% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo3–9-0.2321%25 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0719%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0519%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.1013%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0316%21 Aug
ancient13–60.0018%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0812%18 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1529%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0615%12 Aug
dust26–130.0229%12 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0233%11 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0216%11 Aug
inferno9–70.0832%11 Aug
ancient16–12-0.037%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0219%9 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0421%9 Aug
inferno9–5-0.1713%7 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0226%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0126%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0432%7 Aug
cache13–11-0.0214%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0120%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0424%28 Jul
cache0–13-0.089%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0523%28 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0019%24 Jul
dust211–13-0.0611%21 Jul
ancient13–90.0328%21 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0418%20 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0524%20 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0213%20 Jul
cache0–13-0.040%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0414%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0714%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0415%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0235%19 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0227%19 Jul
mirage13–10.0421%18 Jul
mirage0–13-0.1010%18 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0310%16 Jul
mirage19–16-0.0319%14 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0126%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.0719%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0321%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0110%10 Jul
dust28–130.0124%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0115%10 Jul
cache13–4-0.0227%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0416%9 Jul
cache13–7-0.0518%9 Jul
cache5–13-0.0014%8 Jul
cache13–50.0132%8 Jul
cache13–9-0.0614%8 Jul
vertigo13–7-0.0218%7 Jul
dust213–80.0713%7 Jul
overpass10–130.0315%6 Jul
dust213–7-0.0514%6 Jul
overpass13–3-0.0131%5 Jul
ancient11–130.0113%2 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0525%1 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0629%1 Jul
inferno7–90.0437%1 Jul
ancient6–130.0316%30 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0513%30 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0126%30 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0122%26 Jun
inferno9–70.2018%26 Jun
nuke3–90.009%26 Jun
ancient1–9-0.0415%22 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0215%19 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0214%19 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0526%18 Jun
anubis10–130.0121%18 Jun
inferno6–9-0.1132%18 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0717%18 Jun
inferno9–4-0.0540%14 Jun
cache8–13-0.0515%12 Jun
inferno16–140.0128%6 Jun
dust213–20.0520%6 Jun
nuke6–130.0317%6 Jun
mirage13–70.0118%5 Jun
ancient13–100.0225%5 Jun
cache13–2-0.0324%5 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0313%4 Jun
ancient13–70.0522%4 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0814%4 Jun
inferno5–90.0259%3 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0918%3 Jun
cache16–14-0.0417%3 Jun
cache5–13-0.0311%3 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0519%3 Jun
dust23–13-0.047%3 Jun
mirage11–130.0023%3 Jun
inferno5–9-0.1218%31 May
inferno6–9-0.1227%31 May
inferno7–9-0.0128%31 May
inferno7–9-0.2219%30 May
inferno8–80.0517%30 May
inferno9–7-0.0127%30 May
inferno9–50.0336%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →