rhadoo

rhadoo — CS2 Stats

RO76561198320465468[U:1:360199740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

338Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,237Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,000Light Blue band · top ~59.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,000 -1,564 26 Sept – 8 Nov · 17 days played
9,00012,197peak 12,19726 Sept8 Nov
12,510Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,197 below peak (12,197)
  • -3,197 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,000 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.4%42.7%43.8%4.3% short
Shot accuracy14.6%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.880.991.020.13 short
Match win rate41.1%43.9%44.7%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrhadooFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER9,000 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning52
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateLWLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +44ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 734ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility3.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.2
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · train, 10 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 2 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 16 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 16nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2610–1638%-0.01
dust2D186–1233%-0.04
cacheS1612–475%-0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.01
anubisA138–562%-0.01
nukeD71–614%-0.04
infernoC52–340%0.02
train—11–0100%0.11
vertigo—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,469Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
2,096Matches
41.1%Match win rate
39.4%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,979MVPs
659Hours (in match)
1,203Bombs planted
524Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,591dust2
1,997inferno
998nuke
752vertigo
508train
274lake
112office
104cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

105Matches
49%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
70.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3345%0.9814.8
Dust21947%0.9513.5
Anubis1850%0.8612.4
Ancient1338%1.0815.2
Cache862%1.0315.5
Nuke540%0.9916.8
Inferno3100%1.5311.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
624msReaction time
65.6%T opening success
29.3%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3908 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.2628% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0133%14 Nov →
ancient13–4-0.007%14 Nov →
mirage8–130.0315%14 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0812%14 Nov →
mirage13–90.0016%14 Nov →
mirage13–160.0111%14 Nov →
ancient13–80.0333%14 Nov →
mirage13–70.046%13 Nov →
nuke13–160.0120%13 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0024%13 Nov →
mirage13–160.0013%13 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0119%13 Nov →
inferno12–30.0819%13 Nov →
mirage13–100.0821%12 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0128%12 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0316%12 Nov →
mirage8–130.0018%12 Nov →
anubis16–120.0711%9 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0318%9 Nov →
mirage14–160.0424%9 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0918%8 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0312%8 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.059%8 Nov →
dust21–13-0.0332%8 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.0315%8 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0317%8 Nov →
anubis13–60.0313%8 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0812%7 Nov →
anubis1–13-0.0515%7 Nov →
dust216–12-0.0619%6 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0112%6 Nov →
anubis5–130.0628%6 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.0117%6 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0323%6 Nov →
cache13–110.039%6 Nov →
cache13–100.0419%3 Nov →
inferno6–130.0123%3 Nov →
inferno3–130.0526%3 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0613%22 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0917%22 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.035%22 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0216%22 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0225%19 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0627%19 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0611%18 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0314%18 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.054%18 Oct →
mirage7–130.0119%18 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0215%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.0417%18 Oct →
anubis13–80.0625%16 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0611%16 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0410%16 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0724%16 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0115%16 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0223%15 Oct →
cache6–20.0518%15 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0719%15 Oct →
ancient13–30.0726%15 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0616%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1214%11 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0916%10 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0612%10 Oct →
dust213–30.0324%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0718%10 Oct →
train13–40.1122%10 Oct →
cache5–130.0719%10 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0313%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0023%9 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0512%9 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0516%9 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0414%9 Oct →
mirage16–120.0213%9 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0522%7 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0218%7 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0232%4 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0720%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0815%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0216%4 Oct →
ancient13–100.0523%4 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0427%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0621%4 Oct →
cache13–100.0126%3 Oct →
anubis13–110.0431%3 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0023%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0820%2 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0335%2 Oct →
ancient10–130.0314%2 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0114%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0418%1 Oct →
mirage13–60.0227%1 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0521%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0026%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0712%26 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0211%26 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.037%26 Sept →
dust26–13-0.080%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0316%26 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0218%25 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.