๋

๋ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198313230180[U:1:352964452]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,315Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,467Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating14,943Blue band · top ~28.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,943 -3,308 24 Aug – 4 Nov · 18 days played
14,31019,174peak 19,17424 Aug4 Nov
19,174Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-08-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,231 below peak (19,174)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 57 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate43.4%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy12.5%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.790.950.980.19 short
Match win rate40.0%42.6%43.3%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๋FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER14,943 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning62
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLWWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +11.8pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 42%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility3.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch7.4

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.2
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time596ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+5.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 28 Oct →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 1–6 · inferno, 4 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · nuke, 22 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · train, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2210–1245%0.01
infernoS1711–665%0.02
cacheS1510–567%-0.01
nukeD133–1023%-0.02
anubisC94–544%-0.00
dust2C83–538%-0.01
ancientD62–433%-0.00
train—32–167%0.00
vertigo—31–233%-0.05
italy—21–150%0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.02
office—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,848Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
5,284Matches
40.0%Match win rate
43.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
12.5%Shot accuracy
10,179MVPs
1,947Hours (in match)
3,134Bombs planted
1,062Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,045
AWP11,205
SSG 082,365
AUG1,956
MP91,807
MAC-101,768

Lifetime map wins

5,253inferno
5,034dust2
2,542nuke
1,327vertigo
842train
842lake
476cbble
334office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches
52%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
75.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3100%1.3912.7
Dust2250%0.9011.0
Inferno20%0.7211.5
Vertigo250%1.3130.5
Nuke1100%1.0813.0
Ancient1100%0.8917.0
Anubis10%0.386.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.5%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
601msReaction time
55.4%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
5.64HE damage / grenade
12.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4151 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–6-0.0257%4 Nov →
dust213–100.0138%4 Nov →
cache13–6-0.1043%3 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0048%3 Nov →
cache13–30.0825%3 Nov →
nuke9–6-0.0024%3 Nov →
inferno2–9-0.0327%3 Nov →
anubis13–60.1125%2 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0218%2 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0134%2 Nov →
cache11–130.0225%31 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0717%30 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0216%30 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0350%30 Oct →
dust213–7-0.019%30 Oct →
train13–70.0518%30 Oct →
overpass4–13-0.0229%30 Oct →
ancient13–40.0325%30 Oct →
italy11–13-0.0211%30 Oct →
italy13–30.1123%30 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0528%30 Oct →
dust25–130.0633%30 Oct →
nuke9–130.0139%30 Oct →
mirage13–60.0039%30 Oct →
office3–130.0345%30 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0221%30 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.0433%30 Oct →
train13–0-0.0440%30 Oct →
cache11–130.0416%29 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0129%29 Oct →
vertigo7–9-0.0524%29 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.0919%29 Oct →
inferno9–40.0616%29 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0425%29 Oct →
inferno9–60.0342%29 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0024%29 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.170%29 Oct →
inferno9–70.1550%28 Oct →
inferno9–50.2156%28 Oct →
inferno9–20.1146%28 Oct →
nuke8–8-0.0738%28 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0217%28 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0530%28 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0132%28 Oct →
mirage13–100.0214%28 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0612%24 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0220%23 Oct →
nuke13–30.0426%23 Oct →
mirage8–130.0632%22 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0733%22 Oct →
inferno9–4-0.0316%21 Oct →
inferno10–130.0527%20 Oct →
ancient13–40.1145%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0828%20 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0516%20 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0719%16 Oct →
anubis13–40.0914%16 Oct →
mirage13–60.0623%15 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0329%15 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0118%15 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0717%11 Oct →
mirage8–130.0124%10 Oct →
train6–13-0.0033%10 Oct →
anubis5–130.0132%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0035%13 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0022%13 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0135%13 Sept →
mirage13–60.0227%13 Sept →
vertigo8–8-0.0547%13 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.1217%6 Sept →
nuke8–130.0325%6 Sept →
nuke10–130.0131%6 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0230%5 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0920%5 Sept →
cache16–140.0526%5 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0217%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0218%4 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0136%4 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0023%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0124%4 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0129%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0414%1 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0522%1 Sept →
mirage13–70.0218%1 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0218%1 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0027%1 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0231%1 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0312%30 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0522%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0017%30 Aug →
mirage13–60.0730%30 Aug →
anubis10–130.0116%25 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0415%25 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0016%24 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0526%24 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0043%24 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0428%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.1826%24 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.043%23 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0113%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.